|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ascender: Airship to Orbit?
Allen Meece wrote:
Here is how JPA describes their "third stage" Orbital Ascender: The third part of the architecture is an airship/dynamic vehicle that flies directly to orbit. In order to utilize the few molecules of gas at extreme altitudes, this craft is big. The initial test vehicle is 6,000 feet (over a mile) long. The airship uses buoyancy to climb to 200,000 feet. From there it uses electric propulsion to slowly accelerate. As it accelerates it dynamically climbs. Over several days it reaches orbital velocity. Lift here is not aerodynamic lift but is rather, positive buoyancy. So it makes the L/D ratio irrelevant. The ship is weightless at 200K feet and needs little aerodynamic lift. As the velocity increases, so does centripetal force, helping to "lift" the craft. To the best of my knowledge the record altitude of stratospheric balloon is 52 kilometers, which is only 170,603 feet. If you add solar panels and cargo, you cannot fly much higher than 40 km. Density of dry air equals 1.3 kg/m^3 at sea level. At higher altitudes it drops approximately 10 times for every 20 km of altitude gain. At 40 km altitude the air density is about 0.01 kg/m^3. Let us assume that the balloon is a sphere having diameter of 100 meters, and its velocity is 100 m/s. Aerodynamic drag of the balloon in fast, turbulent flight equals: F = Cd * D * V^2 * A / 2 Cd = 0.5 (coefficient of drag of a smooth sphere) D = 0.01 kg/m^3 (air density at 40 km) V = velocity of the balloon A = PI * d^2 / 4 = 7854 m^2 (cross section area of the ball shaped balloon, d = balloon diameter) F = 0.5 * 0.01 * 100^2 * 7854 / 2 = 392700 newtons! 392700 newtons is the gravitational pull of an object that has the mass of 40 tons. 40 tons equals 88,358 pounds. You can reduce the coefficient of drag several times by making a more slender, streamlined balloon. Let us assume that the drag equals only 10 tons. The minimum power required to pull the balloon at 100 m/s equals: P = 100,000 N * 100 m/s = 10 megawatts Solar cell weight is about 40 kg per one kilowatt of power output. If we assume that the total weight-to-power ratio of the propulsion (solar cells, electric motor, and propeller) is 100 kg/kW, the propulsion weight is 1000 tons, which is two orders of magnitude more than the buoyancy of the balloon. Anyone who claims that the balloon can fly at orbital velocity (8 km/s) does not understand aerodynamics. __________________________________________________ You can determine the air density more precisely using the following formula for atmospheric pressu p = B(exp(-MgY/RT)), Whe p = pressure at elevation Y B = pressure at elevation zero exp = natural exponent M = molecular mass, or mass in kg per mol (M = 0.0288 kg/mol for dry air) g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s^2 R = gas constant = 8.314 J/(mol*K) T = absolute temperature (in Kelvins) = 273 K Atmospheric density is proportional to its pressure and inversely proportional to its absolute temperature. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Ascender: Airship to Orbit?
Andrew Nowicki wrote:
Solar cell weight is about 40 kg per one kilowatt of power output. Please note that there us nothing fundamental about this figure. Direct bandgap semiconductor materials can absorb light with a thickness of perhaps 100 nanometers (the absorption length of ordinary crystalline silicon is much longer.) If the density of the material is 2 g/cm^3, and the efficiency 15%, and the mass/area of the plastic, etc. onto which the PV material is deposited is similar, then the power density in raw sunlight is about 500 kW/kg. This concept is already assuming the use of large, very light inflatable structures with significant structural strength; also assuming that those structures are thin film PV collectors isn't much more of a stretch. Paul |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Orbital Mechanics | JOE HECHT | Space Shuttle | 7 | July 21st 04 09:27 PM |
Jonathan's Space Report No. 516 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 22nd 03 03:13 PM |
Low Earth orbit to Moon trajectory dynamics | Abdul Ahad | Technology | 5 | November 27th 03 03:15 AM |
Orbit for Hermes Dynamically Linked from 1937 to 2003 | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 17th 03 02:03 AM |
Ed Lu Letter from Space #6 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | July 4th 03 11:10 AM |