|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
INVALIDITY OF SR POSTULATES
GSS wrote in message
[snip] In fact the postulate that the speed of light c is the same in all inertial frames, only holds true if the Einstein's clock synchronization convention is ASSUMED to be valid. However, I have already demonstrated in the previous thread (linked below) that the notion of 'common time' between A and B, *established by definition* can be valid if and only if all inertial reference frames in relative uniform motion are assumed to be at rest in BCRF. And this contradiction shatters the second postulate of SR. Experimental evidence ( http://www.edu-observatory.org/physi...periments.html ) shatters the validity of the conclusions you draw from your gut feeling principles. I know, that might seem a bit unfair, but it's the way thing are done in science. You might try a philosophy newsgroup to advertise your book... Dirk Vdm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
INVALIDITY OF SR POSTULATES | rotchm | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 18th 09 03:40 PM |
INVALIDITY OF SR POSTULATES | Dave Parker | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 3rd 09 06:29 PM |
INVALIDITY OF SR POSTULATES | Uncle Al | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 3rd 09 05:08 PM |
INVALIDITY OF SR POSTULATES | Dono | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 3rd 09 04:04 PM |
THE POSTULATES OF GENERAL RELATIVITY | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 11 | November 4th 07 07:31 AM |