|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The fundamental flaw of GR
On Aug 19, 2:51 pm, eric gisse wrote:
Aetherist However, a 'Black Hole' is not a flaw in GR it's a flaw in taking the mathematical model beyond it domain of applicability. This is why it's technically called 'a singularity'... Modernist have come to beleive that its OK to accept singularities in the math. Just look at the process of renormalization. That's the problem with being an uneducated amateur. You get to write **** like that without the burden of knowing what the **** you are talking about. As a college drop-out, you think you know everything. shrug Black holes are manifestations of a few solutions to the field equations where the field equations are basically what GR is all about. There are other solutions that support Newtonian law of gravity at weak curvature in spacetime. shrug Take this calculus case for example, f(x) = sin(x) / x You are such an idiot. The above function has no singularity at (x = 0). It is a really, really bad and stupid example. It reflects your sorrowful status today as a decade old super senior at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks. shrug Or how about the entirity of residue theory from complex analysis? That requires knowledge of the various _types_ of singularities, and allows you to calculate various integrals. This does not even remotely apply to black holes. You are such an idiot. Stay as a college dropout. shrug What about classical electromagnetic theory, which you have such a ****ing hardon for? Classical electromagnetism results in the computer that you posted that ignorant post. It is good to stay despite you throwing a fit. shrug Calculate the self-energy of an electron. What does that mean? You get a divergent answer. It does not apply in this discussion. shrug What about the field strength of a charge as r -- 0? Same song, different verse. Still does not apply to the discussion. shrug Hint: GR has nothing to do with electromagnetism. Just pick up one of these textbooks that you are sitting on. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The fundamental flaw of GR
so, you are assuming that gravity has nothing to do
with electromagnetism? ever read of the Alfven cosmology with equal parts antimatter? Hint: *GR has nothing to do with electromagnetism. *Just pick up one of these textbooks that you are sitting on. *shrug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The fundamental flaw of GR
I can recommend Eric Lerner's gut-level book;
he was a student of Alfven, I guess at UCSD, working in the plasma lab. *GR has nothing to do with electromagnetism. *Just pick up one |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Flaw the JWST Doesn't (Have to) Have? | Quadibloc | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | July 20th 11 12:28 AM |
GR flaw update. | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 17th 09 07:32 AM |
The Flaw of the Big Bang theory | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 2 | July 31st 08 06:44 PM |
FLOPS, a flaw ! | SETI | 0 | October 19th 06 01:55 PM |