|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote:
Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. ~ BG |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 8, 12:44*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. *It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. *Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see what our resident rabbi thinks. Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...se_frm/thread/ 8527f0ff70420af5?hl=en# ~ BG |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 8, 12:44*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. *It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. *Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see for yourself what our resident rabbi thinks. Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...0420af5?hl=en# Mention the original molecular mass of Sirius, gravity and tidal radii in the same context, and all the kosher brown-nosed clowns come out to play. ~ BG |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 9, 1:04*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 8, 12:44*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. *It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. *Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see for yourself what our resident rabbi thinks. *Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. No, not enough, Brad. We want the whole enchilada, not just the crumbs that dribble from the emperor's table. Apparently some want to remain ignorant that (Newton's) hypotheses didn't evolve from another's hypothesis, it evolved by solving a conjecture that he had with collaboration with others along with some of his (and perhaps others') observations. Newton completely lacked the tools of faster discernment, such as computers to solve equations, mathematical tables, etc., just as there are many "fringe group" scientists or willing entrepreneurs that are practically pregnant with expectation that if they just had a small laboratory or production line to manufacture a prototype of some kind, that their ideas would not have been quashed by selfish politicians with an axe to grind. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8527f0... Mention the original molecular mass of Sirius, gravity and tidal radii in the same context, and all the kosher brown-nosed clowns come out to play. Samson slaughtered over 3,000 Philistines in the Temple of Dagon. Perhaps the Philistines were misusing what the Dagon had given them in terms of knowledge - and the bigger God Yahwah served it to them a la catre? *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 8, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. ~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: "The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see for yourself what our resident rabbi thinks. Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. No, not enough, Brad. We want the whole enchilada, not just the crumbs that dribble from the emperor's table. Apparently some want to remain ignorant that (Newton's) hypotheses didn't evolve from another's hypothesis, it evolved by solving a conjecture that he had with collaboration with others along with some of his (and perhaps others') observations. Newton completely lacked the tools of faster discernment, such as computers to solve equations, mathematical tables, etc., just as there are many "fringe group" scientists or willing entrepreneurs that are practically pregnant with expectation that if they just had a small laboratory or production line to manufacture a prototype of some kind, that their ideas would not have been quashed by selfish politicians with an axe to grind. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8527f0... Mention the original molecular mass of Sirius, gravity and tidal radii in the same context, and all the kosher brown-nosed clowns come out to play. Samson slaughtered over 3,000 Philistines in the Temple of Dagon. Perhaps the Philistines were misusing what the Dagon had given them in terms of knowledge - and the bigger God Yahwah served it to them a la carte? American - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 9, 10:21*am, American wrote:
On Sep 8, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 9, 1:47*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 9, 10:21*am, American wrote: On Sep 8, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. *It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. *Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see for yourself what our resident rabbi thinks. *Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. No, not enough, Brad. We want the whole enchilada, not just the crumbs that dribble from the emperor's table. *Apparently some want to remain ignorant that (Newton's) hypotheses didn't evolve from another's hypothesis, it evolved by solving a conjecture that he had with collaboration with others along with some of his (and perhaps others') observations. Newton completely lacked the tools of faster discernment, such as computers to solve equations, mathematical tables, etc., just as there are many "fringe group" scientists or willing entrepreneurs that are practically pregnant with expectation that if they just had a small laboratory or production line to manufacture a prototype of some kind, that their ideas would not have been quashed by selfish politicians with an axe to grind. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8527f0.... Mention the original molecular mass of Sirius, gravity and tidal radii in the same context, and all the kosher brown-nosed clowns come out to play. Samson slaughtered over 3,000 Philistines in the Temple of Dagon. Perhaps the Philistines were misusing what the Dagon had given them in terms of knowledge - and the bigger God Yahwah served it to them a la carte? American So, where exactly are these nifty Gods when you need them? Are you one of their terrestrial minions? *and if so, what have you accomplished? I'm looking for honest collaboration and other observationology talent. (got any?) *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, what happened after reconstruction? What happens with transnationalist treaties when the U.S. was/is supposed to shoulder reparations, when TITHING would have solved problems internationally without having to depend so much on international banking cartels being just so many busybodies with their hard-earned loot? Why did real Americans LEAVE the continent of Europe, as well as imperialist England anyway? Wasn't it a result of recognizing the fact that ourselves, as 'grains of sand' were receiving an otherworldly promise of dominion over the entire earth? If this is true, then why fund ANY NATION, INCLUDING OUR OWN for that matter, that magnifies itself as some extreme social political monster that must impose its will over the entire earth? American |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 9, 11:19*am, American wrote:
On Sep 9, 1:47*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 9, 10:21*am, American wrote: On Sep 8, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. *It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. *Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see for yourself what our resident rabbi thinks. *Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. No, not enough, Brad. We want the whole enchilada, not just the crumbs that dribble from the emperor's table. *Apparently some want to remain ignorant that (Newton's) hypotheses didn't evolve from another's hypothesis, it evolved by solving a conjecture that he had with collaboration with others along with some of his (and perhaps others') observations. Newton completely lacked the tools of faster discernment, such as computers to solve equations, mathematical tables, etc., just as there are many "fringe group" scientists or willing entrepreneurs that are practically pregnant with expectation that if they just had a small laboratory or production line to manufacture a prototype of some kind, that their ideas would not have been quashed by selfish politicians with an axe to grind. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8527f0... Mention the original molecular mass of Sirius, gravity and tidal radii in the same context, and all the kosher brown-nosed clowns come out to play. Samson slaughtered over 3,000 Philistines in the Temple of Dagon. Perhaps the Philistines were misusing what the Dagon had given them in terms of knowledge - and the bigger God Yahwah served it to them a la carte? American So, where exactly are these nifty Gods when you need them? Are you one of their terrestrial minions? *and if so, what have you accomplished? I'm looking for honest collaboration and other observationology talent. (got any?) *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, what happened after reconstruction? What happens with transnationalist treaties when the U.S. was/is supposed to shoulder reparations, when TITHING would have solved problems internationally without having to depend so much on international banking cartels being just so many busybodies with their hard-earned loot? Why did real Americans LEAVE the continent of Europe, as well as imperialist England anyway? Wasn't it a result of recognizing the fact that ourselves, as 'grains of sand' were receiving an otherworldly promise of dominion over the entire earth? If this is true, then why fund ANY NATION, INCLUDING OUR OWN for that matter, that magnifies itself as some extreme social political monster that must impose its will over the entire earth? American You'll have to ask our resident rabbi Saul Levy, because supposedly he knows everything that William Mook doesn't know. Between those two, nothing should go unanswered, much less outside of whatever's kosher approved. ~ BG |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 9, 3:40*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 9, 11:19*am, American wrote: On Sep 9, 1:47*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Sep 9, 10:21*am, American wrote: On Sep 8, 12:44 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Aug 24, 11:07 am, BradGuth wrote: Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special) All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the better. In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing, revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring, researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge, because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it is. *~ BG On Jul 6, 6:55 am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...calgroup..html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” Interesting, to see how deathly frightened so many folks are these days. *It's almost as though Hitler was still alive and kicking at those willing to do the math, and otherwise willing to use a deductive method of connecting the dots. *Forbid any free thoughts of revising history or the scientific record in order to reflect the best available truths, because you'll only lose your job and benefits, as such would even scare the Pope to death. Visit "alt.astronomy" if you want to see for yourself what our resident rabbi thinks. *Apparently the Newtonian laws of gravity are not kosher enough. No, not enough, Brad. We want the whole enchilada, not just the crumbs that dribble from the emperor's table. *Apparently some want to remain ignorant that (Newton's) hypotheses didn't evolve from another's hypothesis, it evolved by solving a conjecture that he had with collaboration with others along with some of his (and perhaps others') observations. Newton completely lacked the tools of faster discernment, such as computers to solve equations, mathematical tables, etc., just as there are many "fringe group" scientists or willing entrepreneurs that are practically pregnant with expectation that if they just had a small laboratory or production line to manufacture a prototype of some kind, that their ideas would not have been quashed by selfish politicians with an axe to grind. http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8527f0... Mention the original molecular mass of Sirius, gravity and tidal radii in the same context, and all the kosher brown-nosed clowns come out to play. Samson slaughtered over 3,000 Philistines in the Temple of Dagon. Perhaps the Philistines were misusing what the Dagon had given them in terms of knowledge - and the bigger God Yahwah served it to them a la carte? American So, where exactly are these nifty Gods when you need them? Are you one of their terrestrial minions? *and if so, what have you accomplished? I'm looking for honest collaboration and other observationology talent. (got any?) *~ BG- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sure, what happened after reconstruction? What happens with transnationalist treaties when the U.S. was/is supposed to shoulder reparations, when TITHING would have solved problems internationally without having to depend so much on international banking cartels being just so many busybodies with their hard-earned loot? Why did real Americans LEAVE the continent of Europe, as well as imperialist England anyway? Wasn't it a result of recognizing the fact that ourselves, as 'grains of sand' were receiving an otherworldly promise of dominion over the entire earth? If this is true, then why fund ANY NATION, INCLUDING OUR OWN for that matter, that magnifies itself as some extreme social political monster that must impose its will over the entire earth? American You'll have to ask our ... read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I doubt that. I'll take any blockhead with just a whit of common sense and a few dollars to spare, to at least get the ball rolling on a few new ideas - perhaps something larger than HO scale would suffice - at least to demonstrate the whole concept of electrogravitic propulsion. If you wait too long than somebody - perhaps an Iraqi, or even Afghan, Iranian or Venezuelan (oops) might supplant your idea - particularly when there are just so many channels that it takes to get an idea patented and/or approved by the ruling establishment. Of course I'm exaggerating a bit on the ethnicity of those interested, but it's just the politics of some very useful ideas that are left hanging - one shouldn't have to always be looking behind themselves as well as covering their tracks so much when the name of the inventor's game should've been "yankee ingenuity". You can't tell me that the world has been asleep for so long that only "exported" American ingenuity makes the difference here. American |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Sep 9, 4:20*pm, American wrote:
I'll take any blockhead with just a whit of common sense and a few dollars to spare, to at least get the ball rolling on a few new ideas - perhaps something larger than HO scale would suffice - at least to demonstrate the whole concept of electrogravitic propulsion. If you wait too long than somebody - perhaps an Iraqi, or even Afghan, Iranian or Venezuelan (oops) might supplant your idea - particularly when there are just so many channels that it takes to get an idea patented and/or approved by the ruling establishment. Of course I'm exaggerating a bit on the ethnicity of those interested, but it's just the politics of some very useful ideas that are left hanging - one shouldn't have to always be looking behind themselves as well as covering their tracks so much when the name of the inventor's game should've *been "yankee ingenuity". You can't tell me that the world has been asleep for so long that only "exported" American ingenuity makes the difference here. American What has any of this got to do with the Sirius star/solar system? "Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable" ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |