|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and as such having taken at least ten millions up to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be condescending, but what as of somewhat recently took place within our solar system and upon Earth as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, I believe wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to the our moon and the last ice- age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, but merely asking as to what exactly took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth and affected the subsequent last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 +/- 25 odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth. Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, as always touted and enforced by the usual preponderance of our alt.astronomy naysayers, but merely asking as to the best available swag of what took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this consequence wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth, and having ever since contributed to the last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original proto-Sirius molecular cloud 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 (+/- 25) odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth, especially as the cloud got blown/expanded further away from having created the Sirius star system. Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 25, 12:05*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, as always touted and enforced by the usual preponderance of our alt.astronomy naysayers, but merely asking as to the best available swag of what took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this consequence wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth, and having ever since contributed to the last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original proto-Sirius molecular cloud 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 (+/- 25) odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth, especially as the cloud got blown/expanded further away from having created the Sirius star system. Downright silly of little old me, to think that these topic and reply lords of Google Groups and Usenet/newsgroups are not even up to the minimal physics and science standards of a dysfunctional 5th grader. Perhaps our public news and infomercial spewing media (including our school textbooks) needs to get themselves unplugged from the pecker of their mainstream Borg collective, and while they’re at it, rediscover their balls. BradGuth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet” |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 27, 1:05*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:05*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, as always touted and enforced by the usual preponderance of our alt.astronomy naysayers, but merely asking as to the best available swag of what took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this consequence wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth, and having ever since contributed to the last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since.. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original proto-Sirius molecular cloud 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 (+/- 25) odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth, especially as the cloud got blown/expanded further away from having created the Sirius star system. Downright silly of little old me, to think that these topic and reply lords of Google Groups and Usenet/newsgroups are not even up to the minimal physics and science standards of a dysfunctional 5th grader. Perhaps our public news and infomercial spewing media (including our school textbooks) needs to get themselves unplugged from the pecker of their mainstream Borg collective, and while they’re at it, rediscover their balls. As per usual, the all-knowing mainstream status quo is being told to back off and keep away at all cost, as in mum's the word. It's as though the planet Venus has the ultimate plague, or something worse that Zionist Nazis want absolutely nothing to do with. Perhaps you can share as to how it feels working for Hitler or those of his Zionist puppet masters? BradGuth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “GuthUsenet” |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 25, 12:05*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, as always touted and enforced by the usual preponderance of our alt.astronomy naysayers, but merely asking as to the best available swag of what took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this consequence wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth, and having ever since contributed to the last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original proto-Sirius molecular cloud 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 (+/- 25) odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth, especially as the cloud got blown/expanded further away from having created the Sirius star system. Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” How can such a nearby and vibrant star system be so intellectually and scientifically dark and scary? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 30, 9:32*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:05*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, as always touted and enforced by the usual preponderance of our alt.astronomy naysayers, but merely asking as to the best available swag of what took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this consequence wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth, and having ever since contributed to the last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since.. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original proto-Sirius molecular cloud 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 (+/- 25) odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth, especially as the cloud got blown/expanded further away from having created the Sirius star system. *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” How can such a nearby and vibrant star system be so intellectually and scientifically dark and scary? Are we talking about stellar electron kinds of repulsion that'll far exceed the Newtonian force of gravity? As otherwise according to the peer accepted formula and that of the much less force of gravity that's holding onto our Kuiper and Oort cloud items is hardly worth anything compared to the mutual binding force of gravity that exist between our solar system and that of Sirius. Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 31, 4:29*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 30, 9:32*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 25, 12:05*pm, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 25, 12:05*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 15, 10:33*am, BradGuth wrote: On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote: Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by the Sirius star/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet” What would have happened within our solar system and the environment of Eden/Earth as we passed through any remaining portion of the same molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses, as what had just given birth to those nearby Sirius stars and such having taken at least ten millions to a hundred some odd million years in order to create? I don't mean to be technically condescending or willfully disregarding of other established interpretations, as always touted and enforced by the usual preponderance of our alt.astronomy naysayers, but merely asking as to the best available swag of what took place as of somewhat recently within our solar system and upon Earth, as of a few years after Sirius B had its helium flashover, whereas I truly believe this consequence wasn't all that insignificant or entirely unrelated to our Selene/moon having encountered Earth, and having ever since contributed to the last ice-age thaw that abruptly started as of 11, 711 years ago, and obviously hasn’t stopped thawing us out ever since. How can our solar system of 2.02e30 kg have been so unaffected by the original 12.5e30 kg worth of the nearby Sirius star/solar system, and even as of today by the remaining 7e30 kg worth of Sirius ABC that we are moving ourselves towards at 7.6 km/sec? Of the original proto-Sirius molecular cloud 12.5e6 solar masses that existed some 250 (+/- 25) odd millions of years ago is also of something truly horrific, that by rights should have affected our nearby solar system and the frail environment of Eden/Earth, especially as the cloud got blown/expanded further away from having created the Sirius star system. Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” How can such a nearby and vibrant star system (especially back in its prime) become so intellectually and scientifically dark and scary? Considering that we're still managing to hold onto Sedna; current (solar system) ~ Sedna/aphelion gravitational attraction: 2.02e30 and 4.7e21 kg at 1.459e14 m = 2.975e13 N Whereas instead Sirius has apparently been holding onto us; current (solar system) ~ Sirius gravitational force of attraction: 2.02e30 and 6.9615e30 kg at 8.1365e16 m = 1.417e17 N Now try to imagine whatever else the Sirius star/solar system of 3.5 solar masses is quite capable of its gravitational force holding onto, not to mention as of prior to Sirius B having lost so much of it’s mass by having been such a red supergiant and only recently becoming a white dwarf, and of not too long before then of whatever the original molecular cloud of 1.25e7 solar masses had to offer (even at 500 ly it’s still a worthy pull or attractive force of 1.528e20 N, or ten fold again out to 5000 ly is still worth 1.528e18 N). As is, the 1.417e17 N (1.445e16 kgf) worth of the Sirius tidal radii holding/binding force or that of its Newtonian dynamic range is what represents a 4763:1 greater gravitational grip than our sun has on little Sedna. Of course you can always maintain your devout trust in mainstream obfuscation and perpetual denials from the likes of our resident newsgroup rabbi, or you can simply do the math yourself, or perhaps use either one of the following: Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius force) http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html Not to further nitpick, however there’s 2005-VX3 / damocloid(asteroid) of 112 km diameter as perhaps worth at most 1.47e18 kg, that’s hanging all the way out to 2275.5 AU (3.4e14 m) that’s worth merely 1.71e9 N, and even it’s not going away from our solar system's tidal radius. That’s representing a Sirius/XV3 ratio of nearly 83e6:1 greater tidal radii hold on us, not to mention that we seem to be headed back towards Sirius at 7.6 km/s and unavoidably accelerating as any elliptical Newtonian trek should. So, what's insurmountable or unusual about Sirius holding onto us? ~ BG |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote:
Siriusand our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and orbital mechanics. In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with theSirius star cluster, even thoughSiriushas only been a relatively newish and extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth. First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million, while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5 million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly nowhere to be found. In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily dominated by theSiriusstar/solar system. Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest. Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone) *http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored) *http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20 *http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html Local galactic motion simulation: *"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B. Nordström et al. *http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including us) for their final demise and/or rebirth. Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting “colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown via mergers. Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely? Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo (much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS. Mainstream physics and science is not to be lightly discounted or otherwise discarded. However, some items of our solar system seem to have been added after the original formations of our sun and a few planets, while others seem badly skewed because of nearby external forces. It seems +/- 1 degree might be an acceptable standard for being part of the original protoplanetary elliptic plane. However, the more degrees off that plane, the more unlikely they existed from the very start of our solar system. Like those icy Pluto planetoids and Sedna at near 12 degrees most certainly are not in the same plane. However, supposedly there are a few interesting Kuiper and Oort retrograde orbits, although Sedna isn't one of those. Noteworthy is that Cruithne has been a nearby second moon of Earth, however oddly so and otherwise at nearly 20 degrees inclination is also not within the expected orbital plane, just like our Selene/moon at 5+ degrees isn’t exactly flying within the expected plane of our solar system. Besides the usual orbital mechanics that can’t quite explain items like Sedna with such minimal velocity and low density, as to why the hell does Sedna bother to turn itself around and head way the hell back out there? (are the Sedna electrons helping to repel it away from those of our solar system electron outflux?) With Sedna we're talking of an extremely deep elliptical trek of 76 AU out to 976 AU and obviously back again, at an average orbital velocity of 1.04 km/sec (about the same as our Selene/moon), with an overall duration of 12,060 years (also given as 10,000 years by some), as supposedly offering the 0.84 eccentric orbit in relationship with the elliptic antipode focus that’s roughly 900 AU. I think it’s more of an irregular elliptical trek that’s taking a tight turn at 76 AU and a broad turn at 976 AU. Just because something like Sedna as once upon a time having been perturbed into an elliptical trek (most likely by Sirius B and/or from that substantial Sirius molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms) , doesn't explain why it's keeping that extreme elliptical pattern, unless the stealth gravity or dark matter influence is still out there, and/or the electrons emitted by Sedna are that much unusually greater influence than previously thought. According to some, there’s also another 40 some odd distant items as large or larger than Sedna. In other words, the reduced velocity at 976 AU and relatively low mass of Sedna simply isn’t worth enough kinetic energy in order to match or exceed the orbital escape velocity, pretty much the same analogy that applies as to why our solar system can not escape the extended elliptic association we have had with the Sirius star/solar system, or at least that of some barycenter dominated by the remaining 3.5 greater mass that used to be worth 12.5 Ms, and before then (250e6 BP) represented by the molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms. How is it even remotely possible of orbital mechanics that applies to the likes of Sedna and otherwise not to the stellar motions of nearby solar systems? Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |