|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 9:49*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ... I'll need some help with that. *Care to offer your services, and to share in the credits? Do you really want your bubble burst that bad? Brad never explains how the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's Star, Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than Sirius, fit into this supposedly gravitationally linked up system. Double-A. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 9:49*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ... I'll need some help with that. *Care to offer your services, and to share in the credits? Do you really want your bubble burst that bad? What bubble? This is purely constructive research and deductive reasoning, whereas we the public already own multiple spendy supercomputers as is, as well as those machines having been public funded for their housing, energy, necessary software and willing programmers, and it's not like each and every one of those computers are booked solid for doing anything all that important anyway. Perhaps this could even be roughly accomplished on a good PC or MAC. As far as I can tell, this is the only prudent trial-and-error simulation method of reasonably back-tracking our association with that terrific star system, going all the way back to its horrific molecular cloud of perhaps at least 1.25e6 Ms (12.5e6 Ms) that gave such multiple stellar births so recently and nearby to us (damn near right on top of us). How can our wussy and relatively low mass solar system not have become tidal radii associated with such a nearby and substantial mass, or having otherwise avoided the subsequent gauntlet of whatever the Sirius (B) demise lost track of? ~ BG |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 10:42*am, Double-A wrote:
On Nov 13, 9:49*am, "Nightcrawler" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in ... I'll need some help with that. *Care to offer your services, and to share in the credits? Do you really want your bubble burst that bad? Brad never explains how the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's Star, Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than Sirius, fit into this supposedly gravitationally linked up system. Double-A. I'm sure those do matter, but it's also the UV spectrum of illumination and the sudden demise of Sirius(B) that seems to fit the time-line of terrestrial geology events, and even of direct benefit as to the vast biodiversity that got a serious cosmic advantage from our elliptical orbit of such a vibrant star system, because it sure as hell it wasn't from what our early sun had to offer. I'm thinking that we used to get to within 0.1 ly, though nowadays it's perhaps at best getting us to within one ly. Eventually (millions of years from now) we might go our separate ways and never see one another again, especially if Sirius(B) merges with Sirius(A) and there's one hell of a nasty nova that becomes a singular large white dwarf or more likely that of a neutron star. ~ BG |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"Double-A" wrote in message ... Brad never explains how the Alpha Centauri system, Barnard's Star, Wolf 359, and Lalande 21185, all closer to us than Sirius, fit into this supposedly gravitationally linked up system. It's called goofy fixation. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... I'm sure those do matter, but it's also the UV spectrum of illumination and the sudden demise of Sirius(B) that seems to fit the time-line of terrestrial geology events, and even of direct benefit as to the vast biodiversity that got a serious cosmic advantage from our elliptical orbit of such a vibrant star system, because it sure as hell it wasn't from what our early sun had to offer. This crap is funny. You are aware that your time lines are screwed up, don't you? The entire Sirius system is younger than life on earth. Our solar system is 4 billion years older than the Sirius system. Sol = ~4.5 billion years. Sirius et al = ~250 million years. Permian period = ~300 million years. Permian extinction = ~251 million years. Sirius B collapse = ~150 million years. Idiot. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 12:26*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ... I'm sure those do matter, but it's also the UV spectrum of illumination and the sudden demise of Sirius(B) that seems to fit the time-line of terrestrial geology events, and even of direct benefit as to the vast biodiversity that got a serious cosmic advantage from our elliptical orbit of such a vibrant star system, because it sure as hell it wasn't from what our early sun had to offer. This crap is funny. You are aware that your time lines are screwed up, don't you? *The entire Sirius system is younger than life on earth. Our solar system is 4 billion years older than the Sirius system. Sol = ~4.5 billion years. Sirius et al = ~250 million years. Permian period = ~300 million years. Permian extinction = ~251 million years. Sirius B collapse = *~150 million years. Idiot. Feel the negativity from the Nightcrawler intellectual black hole that's just sucking everything in. It's like mainstream obfuscation and denial on steroids, except a whole lot better. You and others of your stick-in-the-mud kind are suggesting that a molecular cloud of 1.25e61.25e7 Ms just materialized out of nowhere and parked nearby as of 250~300 MYBP, and that it had absolutely no affect upon our passive little solar system of just slightly over one solar mass, as that terrific Sirius star system was getting produced and then having blown off the remaining 99.9999% of the molecular residual mass? Now that’s what I’d call conditional as well as politically and especially faith-based correct physics. BG |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... Feel the negativity from the Nightcrawler intellectual black hole that's just sucking everything in. It's like mainstream obfuscation and denial on steroids, except a whole lot better. You and others of your stick-in-the-mud kind are suggesting that a molecular cloud of 1.25e61.25e7 Ms just materialized out of nowhere and parked nearby as of 250~300 MYBP, and that it had absolutely no affect upon our passive little solar system of just slightly over one solar mass, as that terrific Sirius star system was getting produced and then having blown off the remaining 99.9999% of the molecular residual mass? Now that's what I'd call conditional as well as politically and especially faith-based correct physics. Translation: I got nothing. See, Guthie, you go off on a tangent when cornered. You claim that a system that didn't exist before life was formed on earth was responsible for SOOOO much in our system, including dumping off a planet and a moon, yet all of this happened in the last 100, our so, million years. Of course pointing out the facts is negative, to you, since accepting the facts means that you probably need to have yourself checked into a clinic for a mental examination. I think it is extremely humorous that you mentioned bi-polar, recently. You exhibit the signs of someone I knew in my youth who went off of his meds. That dude was worth a lot of laughs, then, as you are now. Oh, and study up on nebulae and stellar formation, idiot. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 3:36*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ... Feel the negativity from the Nightcrawler intellectual black hole that's just sucking everything in. *It's like mainstream obfuscation and denial on steroids, except a whole lot better. You and others of your stick-in-the-mud kind are suggesting that a molecular cloud of 1.25e61.25e7 Ms just materialized out of nowhere and parked nearby as of 250~300 MYBP, and that it had absolutely no affect upon our passive little solar system of just slightly over one solar mass, as that terrific Sirius star system was getting produced and then having blown off the remaining 99.9999% of the molecular residual mass? Now that's what I'd call conditional as well as politically and especially faith-based correct physics. Translation: I got nothing. See, Guthie, you go off on a tangent when cornered. *You claim that a system that didn't exist before life was formed on earth was responsible for SOOOO much in our system, including dumping off a planet and a moon, yet all of this happened in the last 100, our so, million years. Please bother to quote, because otherwise you're blowing that same old smoke out your ass (again). Where have I mentioned those "100, our so, million years"? Of course pointing out the facts is negative, to you, since accepting the facts means that you probably need to have yourself checked into a clinic for a mental examination. I think it is extremely humorous that you mentioned bi-polar, recently. You exhibit the signs of someone I knew in my youth who went off of his meds. *That dude was worth a lot of laughs, then, as you are now. Oh, and study up on nebulae and stellar formation, idiot. Been there and done that. Now it's your turn to knock my socks off. Run the damn simulations that you'd claim are so easy to accomplish. ~ BG |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... Please bother to quote, because otherwise you're blowing that same old smoke out your ass (again). Where have I mentioned those "100, our so, million years"? Sorry, but that wasn't in "this" thread. Didn't you state that the moon did its little glance off of the earth about 55 million years ago? Or, was that thousand? Anyway, I stated the 100 million as a round about number. I forgot to add the ~. Sue me. Still doesn't change the fact that you are obfuscating about the facts regarding the time line. Here's some simple math for you. What's the speed necessary to travel 8 light years in 250 million years? Been there and done that. Now it's your turn to knock my socks off. Run the damn simulations that you'd claim are so easy to accomplish. Damn, Brad, you must have been a terrible student. Every time an instructor would ask you to do something you would refuse and demand that they do it for you. Precession ring a bell? Come on Brad. Please explain why Venus does not have precession. It's a simple, two sentence, at the most, answer. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth
On Nov 13, 7:28*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in ... Please bother to quote, because otherwise you're blowing that same old smoke out your ass (again). *Where have I mentioned those "100, our so, million years"? Sorry, but that wasn't in "this" thread. *Didn't you state that the moon did its little glance off of the earth about 55 million years ago? *Or, was that thousand? *Anyway, I stated the 100 million as a round about number. *I forgot to add the ~. *Sue me. I've never used "55 million years ago" (this only proves how totally bogus you really are). I've said multiple times, roughly 13,000 BP for the last time our moon encountered Earth in a lithobraking and seasonal tilt causing way. Before then it was merely a near miss each time. The sky finally started to clear as of 11,711 BP. Still doesn't change the fact that you are obfuscating about the facts regarding the time line. *Here's some simple math for you. *What's the speed necessary to travel 8 light years in 250 million years? Amazing, you're still pretending that the Newtonian law of gravity doesn't apply? Been there and done that. *Now it's your turn to knock my socks off. Run the damn simulations that you'd claim are so easy to accomplish. Damn, Brad, you must have been a terrible student. *Every time an instructor would ask you to do something you would refuse and demand that they do it for you. Precession ring a bell? *Come on Brad. *Please explain why Venus does not have precession. *It's a simple, two sentence, at the most, answer. So, you can't do this gravity thing unless it relates to sustaining your faith-based mainstream status quo. Why am I not surprised. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |