#8
|
|||
|
|||
First stars
In article , jacobnavia
writes: Le 19/05/2018 =E0 11:09, Phillip Helbig (undress to reply) a =E9crit : Again, you are assuming a specific model, based on essentially no information. I am assuming that a quasar can be fed only by 1) gas 2) stars Why this assumption? Gas is not possible (heats up and stops the process) so it must be whole= stars... What else? Primordial black holes. You have no problem postulating that the big bang didn't happen, but are afraid of considering primordial black holes? Which is more probable: you assume that only stars and gas could possibly feed a black hole, then find arguments against them---is it more probable that this somehow concludes that something is wrong with big-bang cosmology, or that perhaps your assumptions are wrong? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vampire Stars, Flying Vampire Stars, Exploding Zombie Stars! | Mark Earnest[_2_] | Misc | 0 | November 18th 17 01:33 PM |
5 star system not enough. Need to use 20, 40, 60 one stars, 20, 40,60 five stars. It becomes labeling. He loves this group. | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 08 09:29 AM |
Gravity of Stars = The light Energy of Stars | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | March 13th 08 12:06 AM |
Gravity of Stars = The light Energy of Stars | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | March 10th 08 01:29 PM |
Stars: Solar Mass and Life Span Question - Larger Stars? | Brett Aubrey | Misc | 2 | January 22nd 05 05:06 AM |