A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 9th 12, 05:04 AM posted to sci.space.policy
signifiespost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. This is
absurd. The collision will commence after 2 billion years. By that
time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his
planets.

Even otherwise, solar system would perish in countless supernova
explosions that follow the galaxy collision.

Check out: http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/
  #2  
Old June 9th 12, 05:19 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On Jun 8, 9:04*pm, signifiespost wrote:
NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. *This is
absurd. *The collision will commence after 2 billion years. *By that
time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his
planets.

Even otherwise, *solar system would perish in countless supernova
explosions that follow the galaxy collision.

Check out: *http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/


The red giant phase should hold off for at least another 3 billion
years.

Gravity tidal issues will likely cause more grief than physical
encounters.

Asteroid and/or planetoid encounter odds should increase by a billion
fold.

Correct, in that such a monumental galactic encounter will be highly
problematic and most likely lethal to our ways of existing.

Tunneling into our moon could prove as a very smart kind of lifeboat.

Do you have a plan for the ultimate survival of humanity?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth
Venus


  #3  
Old June 9th 12, 06:30 AM posted to sci.space.policy
signifiespost
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On Jun 9, 9:19*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 8, 9:04*pm, signifiespost wrote:

NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. *This is
absurd. *The collision will commence after 2 billion years. *By that
time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his
planets.


Even otherwise, *solar system would perish in countless supernova
explosions that follow the galaxy collision.


Check out: *http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/


The red giant phase should hold off for at least another 3 billion
years.

Gravity tidal issues will likely cause more grief than physical
encounters.

Asteroid and/or planetoid encounter odds should increase by a billion
fold.

Correct, in that such a monumental galactic encounter will be highly
problematic and most likely lethal to our ways of existing.

Tunneling into our moon could prove as a very smart kind of lifeboat.

Do you have a plan for the ultimate survival of humanity?

*http://groups.google.com/groups/search
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth
Venus


1. First we have to search for some nomad planets with favorable
conditions for at least saving at least human gene plasm!
2. We should send space & time capsules with these gene seeds!

Thanks. bhatt
  #4  
Old June 9th 12, 10:35 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On Jun 8, 10:30*pm, signifiespost wrote:
On Jun 9, 9:19*am, Brad Guth wrote:









On Jun 8, 9:04*pm, signifiespost wrote:


NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. *This is
absurd. *The collision will commence after 2 billion years. *By that
time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his
planets.


Even otherwise, *solar system would perish in countless supernova
explosions that follow the galaxy collision.


Check out: *http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/


The red giant phase should hold off for at least another 3 billion
years.


Gravity tidal issues will likely cause more grief than physical
encounters.


Asteroid and/or planetoid encounter odds should increase by a billion
fold.


Correct, in that such a monumental galactic encounter will be highly
problematic and most likely lethal to our ways of existing.


Tunneling into our moon could prove as a very smart kind of lifeboat.


Do you have a plan for the ultimate survival of humanity?


*http://groups.google.com/groups/search
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth
Venus


1. *First we have to search for some nomad planets with favorable
conditions for at least saving at least human gene plasm!
2. *We should send space & time capsules with these gene seeds!

Thanks. bhatt


The spendy and badly delayed JWST should spot large numbers of such
cool items headed our way.

No sense chasing after stuff that's headed away from us or even
already passing us.

You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's
sufficiently nearby.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus
  #5  
Old June 10th 12, 05:41 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Alan Erskine[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,026
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's
sufficiently nearby.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne


From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly
called "Earth's second moon""
  #6  
Old June 10th 12, 08:12 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Nun Giver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On Friday, June 8, 2012 9:04:05 PM UTC-7, signifiespost wrote:
NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. This is
absurd. The collision will commence after 2 billion years. By that
time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his
planets.

Even otherwise, solar system would perish in countless supernova
explosions that follow the galaxy collision.

Check out: http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/


Hmm.............. I guess we can stay up tonite and wait for it ;-)

Red Giant first with gooble then red dwarf.

Anyway the planet maybe in the too warm zone in less than a billion.

Mars will warm a bit but its too small for a good planet, IMO.

The species or it next form may make the big jump perhaps even
spreading its seed in a manner that hedges its bets on home planets.

All in the Makers good time..............Trig
  #7  
Old June 12th 12, 05:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote:



You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's
sufficiently nearby.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne


*From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly
called "Earth's second moon""


From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything
original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one
interpretation of anything.
  #8  
Old June 12th 12, 07:11 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

In article
,
Brad Guth wrote:

On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote:



You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's
sufficiently nearby.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne


*From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly
called "Earth's second moon""


From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything
original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one
interpretation of anything.


Pot? Kettle????
  #9  
Old June 13th 12, 02:25 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

On Jun 12, 11:11*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Brad Guth wrote:

On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's
sufficiently nearby.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne


*From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly
called "Earth's second moon""


From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything
original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one
interpretation of anything.


Pot? Kettle????


So, you agree that Alan Erskine is as worthless as any human
(excluding myself) on Earth can possibly get. At least I can fully
support that interpretation of yours.

How about your own contributions: got any?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus

  #10  
Old June 13th 12, 03:54 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy

In article
,
Brad Guth wrote:

On Jun 12, 11:11*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Brad Guth wrote:

On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote:


You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's
sufficiently nearby.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne


*From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly
called "Earth's second moon""


From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything
original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one
interpretation of anything.


Pot? Kettle????


So, you agree that Alan Erskine is as worthless as any human
(excluding myself) on Earth can possibly get. At least I can fully
support that interpretation of yours.

How about your own contributions: got any?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus


If I told you, I'd have to shoot you. ;)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Andromeda Galaxy or US (What if) G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 15 June 7th 06 02:09 PM
Andromeda Galaxy or US (What if) G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 0 May 31st 06 01:37 PM
Andromeda Galaxy Pete Lawrence UK Astronomy 6 November 28th 05 01:53 PM
andromeda galaxy helen abdullahi Misc 7 January 10th 05 03:48 AM
andromeda galaxy? aquablue Misc 6 March 18th 04 10:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.