|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle?
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:29:59 -0400, "Jeff Findley"
wrote: "Pat Flannery" wrote in message hdakotatelephone... Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote: What if the aspects of the design that allow it to be recovered and examined (such as wings and TPS in the case of the Shuttle) add more fatal failure modes than exist in a expendable launch vehicle? As opposed to the failure modes of a capsule? Say an untested parachute and pyro system? What if the gear doesn't come down on the Shuttle during landing approach? That's the first time that gets used on the mission. If one of the main landing gear doesn't come down, one wing tip will hit the runway and the orbiter would spin out of control causing loss of orbiter and crew. If the nose gear doesn't come down, I'm not so sure what would happen. And if none of the gear came down, belly land and hope for the best. I would have thought it wasn't possible, but I also used to think you couldn't land an airliner in a river... take care, Scott |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle?
"Scott Stevenson" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:29:59 -0400, "Jeff Findley" wrote: "Pat Flannery" wrote in message thdakotatelephone... Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote: What if the aspects of the design that allow it to be recovered and examined (such as wings and TPS in the case of the Shuttle) add more fatal failure modes than exist in a expendable launch vehicle? As opposed to the failure modes of a capsule? Say an untested parachute and pyro system? What if the gear doesn't come down on the Shuttle during landing approach? That's the first time that gets used on the mission. If one of the main landing gear doesn't come down, one wing tip will hit the runway and the orbiter would spin out of control causing loss of orbiter and crew. If the nose gear doesn't come down, I'm not so sure what would happen. And if none of the gear came down, belly land and hope for the best. I would have thought it wasn't possible, but I also used to think you couldn't land an airliner in a river... If none of the gear comes down, it's a bad day. Invariably one of the wing tips will hit before the other and the tiles will grip the runway much more than you'd think (much more friction than an your typical aluminum skin on an aircraft), resulting in loss of orbiter and crew. Water ditchings aren't considered survivable either. Any payload in the bay will rip free of its mounts and crash into the crew cabin. The shuttle isn't overbuilt enough to survive these sorts of things. If it were, it would be too heavy. Jeff -- "Take heart amid the deepening gloom that your dog is finally getting enough cheese" - Deteriorata - National Lampoon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle?
Jeff Findley wrote:
If none of the gear comes down, it's a bad day. Invariably one of the wing tips will hit before the other I don't know if that would be the case. The compressed air under it due to ground effect at its high angle of attack on landing (all pure delta aircraft suffer from this phenomena on landing) might make it flatten out as far as any roll angle goes before it hits. But once the rear of the wing-fuselage does hit, the nose is going to come down very hard. Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle? | David Spain | Policy | 210 | October 12th 09 05:25 AM |
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle? | Pat Flannery | History | 0 | September 18th 09 06:28 AM |
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle? | Pat Flannery | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 18th 09 05:50 AM |
Abandoning Orion for a Next Generation Shuttle? | Pat Flannery | History | 0 | September 18th 09 05:50 AM |