A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 18th 09, 06:21 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY

I don't know why sometimes I make it hard on myself. There
I was, just two or three days ago trying to conjure up a
mechanism for why the quasars when in the last edition of this
book I had read about this MECO theory which offers to
replace all black-holes and offers to explain any large
amount of radiation in the cosmos.

Do you ever get yourself in that situation, where you look and
look for a explanation, and yet it is sitting there in front of you
just inviting you by saying "here I am."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do...
Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes

Now I have to check into that MECO theory but it appears
to be a Dirac Radioactivities theory where the particles slip
in and out of the Dirac ocean of positrons or antimatter.

I am going to expand Dirac's Ocean from that of only positrons
to that of being just simply Antimatter.

So when MECO theory posits the slipping in and out of particles
it becomes a matter to antimatter conversion into energy and
thus any high energy is emitted.

So this MECO theory is even better than the old black-hole
theory because it is matter to antimatter conversion whereas
the black-hole theory had to rely upon the stripping away of
matter and for that matter to so to speak "fall into the black-hole
to derive energy out of the falling matter". So that MECO is
even stronger of a energy source than black-hole theory.

Now I am going to make MECO theory the 5th chapter of
this book for it offers astronomy and physics a far better
mechanism of explaining unexplained high energy sources.

Chapters of this book:

(1) what is this theory?
(2) pictures of the Atom Totality theory and history
of the theory and precursor hints

Observational and experimental support

(3) density and distribution of galaxies
(4) Tifft quantized galaxy speeds

(5) MECO theory to explain high energy sources and
removes black-hole theory from science

(6) layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years old Cosmos yet old
galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality 20.2 billion years old; the
data including discussion over the layered ages of the Solar System
where Earth and Sun are likely to be twice as old as Jupiter.

(7) Cores of the Solar System destroys both the Big Bang theory and
Nebular Dust Cloud theory and what replaces them is the Atom
Totality theory and Growing Solar System via Dirac Radioactivities.

(8) uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic microwave background radiation
and the Dark Night sky: Olber's Paradox
(9) missing mass conundrum and the cosmic distribution of chemical
elements
(10) shape of the Cosmos as 6 lobes of 5f6 as nonrelativistic as Cubic
or as relativistic Dodecahedron
(11) color of the cosmos as plutonium off-white

Mathematical and logic beauty support

(12) inverse fine structure constant and proton to electron mass ratio
explained
(13) Bell Inequality with Superdeterminism fits only in an Atom
Totality theory
(14) "pi" and "e" explained
(15) Unification of Forces of Physics to that of one force-- Coulomb
force
makes sense only in an Atom Totality
(16) Gravity becomes the Dirac Ocean of positron-space in a Coulomb
Unification
(17) Atomic Theory as the foundation of science universal laws such
as the Maxwell Equations
(18) Physics due to Atom Totality makes all the other sciences,
especially mathematics as tiny subsets inside of physics
(19) Atomic theory Syllogism
(20) Future News and Research Reports supporting the
Atom Totality Theory and future news and research reports commentary

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #2  
Old May 18th 09, 06:49 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default thanks to Schild and Leitner who cleaned out the black-hole nonsense

--- Quoting in parts from NEW SCIENTIST ---
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do...
Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes

The researchers found that the disc of material surrounding the
central object has a hole in it with a width of about 4000
Astronomical Units (1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the
Sun). This gap suggests that material has been swept out by magnetic
forces from the central object, the researchers say, and must
therefore be a MECO, not a black hole.
(snipped)

According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never
actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense
and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence
inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation.
Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object
remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole.
(snipped)

Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420)

--- end quoting from NEW SCIENTIST ---

The researchers were Schild and Leitner of the Harvard-Smithsonian
Center
of Astrophysics.

The term MECO is derived from "magnetospheric eternally collapsing
object"
and the physics involved is that whereever these high energy sources
in astronomy
come from, seem to have a magnetic field around them, something that a
black-hole
cannot have a magnetic field.

So the new challenge to astronomy is to examine high energy sources of
stars or galaxies and determine if they have a magnetic field via
gravitational lensing.

So, one by one, all the previous proclaimed and acclaimed black-hole
objects
are going to be swept under the rug of shame in science. Simply re-
examine
all those old proclaimed black-holes and find out their "magnetic
field".

Now the MECO theory appears to be a version of the Dirac
Radioactivities
where particles slip in and out of the Dirac Ocean of Antimatter.

You can only have a Ocean of Antimatter sitting alongside a Cosmos of
Matter in an Atom Totality theory, not a Big Bang.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #3  
Old May 18th 09, 07:04 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default thanks to Schild and Leiter who cleaned out the black-hole


Sorry for mispelling it should be Leiter
  #4  
Old May 19th 09, 07:15 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default pretty question: can a MECO be found inside an atom? or can a

The answer to this question is not going to prove the Universe is an
Atom
Totality and is not a Big Bang with black-holes. But the answer to
this
question ought to give any believers of the Big Bang and black-holes,
a
moment to pause and reflect that they have probably been on the wrong
side of the truth of science.

The MECO theory as far as I can tell ends up as the force law of
radioactivity with the Maxwell Equations so the inside of an atom
would definitely be a place in which MECO interactions occurr.
On the other hand, the inside of an atom would not have
any instances of a black-hole.

That does not prove the Atom Totality theory but it sure gives pause
for alarm to anyone who believes in the Big Bang with its black-holes.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #5  
Old May 19th 09, 07:51 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Jim Black
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY

MECOs are an ad-hoc hypothesis invented to bring nature into line with
its proponents' calculus mistakes. And black holes have accretion
disks which can generate magnetic fields. Choose better
revolutionaries.

--
Jim E. Black
  #6  
Old May 19th 09, 08:21 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY



Jim Black wrote:
MECOs are an ad-hoc hypothesis invented to bring nature into line with
its proponents' calculus mistakes. And black holes have accretion
disks which can generate magnetic fields. Choose better
revolutionaries.

--
Jim E. Black


You sided with the camp that violates all laws of physics when you
accepted black-holes.

I sided with the camp that keeps the laws of physics and looks to
explain new phenomenon within those kept laws.

So I cannot tell you, Jim Black chose a better brain since you cannot
switch brains, but is stuck with a poor performing brain.

And when the world of astronomy and physics has flushed black-hole
theory out of science, will you, Jim Black pretend as if you all along
had never accepted black-hole theory? Usually in science, scientists
often go through a pretense stage in their career, where they stick
to one camp and then pretend as if they never did.
  #7  
Old May 19th 09, 08:56 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default Invasion of Iraq in 2003 related to black-hole theory in science MECO theory to replace black-hole theory



wrote:
Jim Black wrote:
MECOs are an ad-hoc hypothesis invented to bring nature into line with
its proponents' calculus mistakes. And black holes have accretion
disks which can generate magnetic fields. Choose better
revolutionaries.

--
Jim E. Black


You sided with the camp that violates all laws of physics when you
accepted black-holes.

I sided with the camp that keeps the laws of physics and looks to
explain new phenomenon within those kept laws.

So I cannot tell you, Jim Black chose a better brain since you cannot
switch brains, but is stuck with a poor performing brain.

And when the world of astronomy and physics has flushed black-hole
theory out of science, will you, Jim Black pretend as if you all along
had never accepted black-hole theory? Usually in science, scientists
often go through a pretense stage in their career, where they stick
to one camp and then pretend as if they never did.


When a science like astronomy and physics becomes lazy, so lazy that
whenever a signal is reported of high-energy then the fall-back
explanation
is a black-hole, is when a science has become rotten.

Black-holes violate all the laws of physics as they violate the Pauli
Exclusion
Principle to name one violation.

In a past century of physics where most went astray by following the
silly
theory of general-relativity with the exclusion of the Quantum
Mechanics is
a folly era of physics and astronomy.

And our recent history in politics is similar to the past century in
physics
and astronomy. The USA invaded Iraq, not because of justifiable
reasons
for invading but simply due to a few men -- Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz
who
wanted to invade and thence looked for some reasons to fobb off the
general public. The reason that was finally glummed onto by Bush
Cheney et
al was weapons of mass destruction.

The same mind game went on in physics and astronomy for the past
century.
A lousy and worthless theory of General Relativity was placed center
stage
and given worship rather than scrutiny and with GR was borne a totally
dumb idea of black-holes. Just as Weapons of Mass destruction was
going
to dumbify the general public and allow a few persons to enter into an
Iraq
War.

If we allowed Quantum Mechanics center stage for the past century we
would
have known that the Pauli Exclusion Principle alone forbids the
formation of
a neutron star and a black-hole.

In Politics or Political Science, if in 2003 we had a Political
Priority Mandate Doctrine
in place that says a politician of a country cannot wage war if other
world priorities
take more pressing need, then Bush and Cheney et al could not have
waged their
own personal war dragging the USA and other countries into a "unneeded
war".

In 2003, there were more pressing priorities of Pakistan-India nuclear
war
sabre rattling, Iran and North Korea nuclear program, and of course
Israel-Palestine

In the long view of history after say 500 years or 1000 years hence,
when they
look back to 2009 and see the folly and sillyness of black-hole
theory, would be
the same silliness of having invaded Iraq in 2003 on the excuse of
weapons of
mass destruction.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
  #8  
Old May 19th 09, 09:25 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Jim Black
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Invasion of Iraq in 2003 related to black-hole theory in science

wrote:
And our recent history in politics is similar to the past century in physics
and astronomy. The USA invaded Iraq, not because of justifiable reasons
for invading but simply due to a few men -- Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz who
wanted to invade and thence looked for some reasons to fobb off the
general public. The reason that was finally glummed onto by Bush Cheney et
al was weapons of mass destruction.

The same mind game went on in physics and astronomy for the past century.
A lousy and worthless theory of General Relativity was placed center stage
and given worship rather than scrutiny and with GR was borne a totally
dumb idea of black-holes. Just as Weapons of Mass destruction was going
to dumbify the general public and allow a few persons to enter into an Iraq
War.


Don't forget the collapse of the real estate market and the revival of
Britney Spears's singing career.

More seriously, if you want to get rid of black holes, you should
obviously get rid of general relativity, the theory of gravitation
which predicts them. Leiter et. al. think general relativity is
right; they only get different conclusions because they **** up the
math. Like I said, choose better revolutionaries.

--
Jim E. Black
  #9  
Old May 20th 09, 01:17 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 291
Default Invasion of Iraq in 2003 related to black-hole theory in science



Jim Black wrote:


More seriously, if you want to get rid of black holes, you should
obviously get rid of general relativity, the theory of gravitation
which predicts them. Leiter et. al. think general relativity is
right; they only get different conclusions because they **** up the
math. Like I said, choose better revolutionaries.

--
Jim E. Black


You can have MECO's without general-relativity.
You can have gravity without general-relativity.
But you are not smart enough for either.

Read Dirac's "Directions in Physics", but you probably can never
understand Dirac.

Gravity without general-relativity? That is very easy, but difficult
for Jim.
Space as ocean of positrons, Jim, that gives you gravity and no
general-relativity.
But stay inside your cacoon of ignorance. Jim, you belong in
Hollywood, not
physics.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds #22 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY(Atom Universe) THEORY [email protected] Astronomy Misc 1 May 9th 09 11:01 PM
#1 new book; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANGTHEORY IN PHYSICS [email protected] Astronomy Misc 13 May 1st 09 06:25 AM
Farm Theory, Also Called, Spring Theory, Yard Theory And TheEvolution Of Our Universe [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 3 September 29th 08 01:11 PM
#262 new book Continental Drift and Plate Tectonic theory updated andbased on Atom Totality theory [email protected] Astronomy Misc 8 April 11th 08 08:24 PM
#1 preface to new book: Growing-Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory a_plutonium[_1_] Astronomy Misc 26 September 12th 07 01:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.