|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:55:45 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: You make heads or tails of this mess: http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Whoever the new president is will have to deal with this. The first thing that I'd do is form a commission to review the "analysis" that led to ESAS. I suspect that they'll find that the sixty-day study was extremely flawed and driven by the biases of its participants (Mike's OSC mafia and Horowitz), and that it ignored all of the data provided by the CE&R contracts. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
On Jan 21, 7:55 am, Pat Flannery wrote:
You make heads or tails of this mess:http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Pat Shove some rods in before the casting? This is looking more, and more like we will do a Ares V, or IV config out of the gate, (or a Delta IV with scaled down CEV). As for the next admin. changing the program, (What a nightmare it would be if Clinton or the Jr. from IL got the lob).,we will be holding hands in orbit, (and singing folk songs with the Russians), for the next 10 years. I feel more and more like it is the mid 70's revisited. Carl P.S. We need to have a fella like John Young, in charge of the program, (with a mandate to put boots an the moon by 2015, NEA by 2020, and Mars 2022). Define a real schedule, and fund it with no B.S. from the talking heads. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
Rand Simberg wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:55:45 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: You make heads or tails of this mess: http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Whoever the new president is will have to deal with this. The first thing that I'd do is form a commission to review the "analysis" that led to ESAS. I suspect that they'll find that the sixty-day study was extremely flawed and driven by the biases of its participants (Mike's OSC mafia and Horowitz), and that it ignored all of the data provided by the CE&R contracts. Maybe they'll put Scotty The Whore Horowitz in jail where he belongs. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
surfduke writes:
On Jan 21, 7:55 am, Pat Flannery wrote: You make heads or tails of this mess:http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Shove some rods in before the casting? This is looking more, and more like we will do a Ares V, or IV config out of the gate, (or a Delta IV with scaled down CEV). As for the next admin. changing the program, (What a nightmare it would be if Clinton or the Jr. from IL got the lob).,we will be holding hands in orbit, (and singing folk songs with the Russians), for the next 10 years. I feel more and more like it is the mid 70's revisited. Carl I am filled with admiration by your creative extending of traditional punctuation. P.S. We need to have a fella like John Young, in charge of the program, (with a mandate to put boots an the moon by 2015, NEA by 2020, and Mars 2022). Define a real schedule, and fund it with no B.S. from the talking heads. Oh, it's just a matter of Having The Will, and a Schedule? Man, makes you wonder what was wrong with everybody from 1967 onward that we didn't think of that. Thanks for clearing things up. And keep it up with the punctuation marks, too. -- Joseph Nebus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
Rand Simberg wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:55:45 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: You make heads or tails of this mess: http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Whoever the new president is will have to deal with this. Just like the next president will have to deal with your wars and your debts, asshole. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
surfduke wrote: You make heads or tails of this mess:http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Pat Shove some rods in before the casting? For anyone missing that reference, placing "resonance rods" inside the fuel grain of a solid fuel engine is one way to stop it from vibrating excessively at high frequency during combustion, and tearing itself apart. You can see them in this cutaway of a Nike booster: http://ed-thelen.org/booster.gif I'd love to see how you'd keep them in place in something the size of a SRB. :-) (Cut to image of them flying out the nozzle and impaling vehicles on the ground like red-hot 150' long spears.) Their weight would be impressive also. Pat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
On 21 Gen, 14:19, (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:55:45 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: You make heads or tails of this mess: http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Whoever the new president is will have to deal with this. *The first thing that I'd do is form a commission to review the "analysis" that led to ESAS. *I suspect that they'll find that the sixty-day study was extremely flawed and driven by the biases of its participants (Mike's OSC mafia and Horowitz), and that it ignored all of the data provided by the CE&R contracts. MAYBE... SOMEDAY... SOMEONE WILL ADMITS I WAS RIGHT IN ALL MY ARTICLES AND POSTS ON FORUMS AND BLOGS... JUST SEARCH AND READ MY 1500+ POSTS ON UPLINK.SPACE.COM WRITTEN IN THE LAST MONTHS OF 2005 WHEN WE HAD ONLY A FEW INFO ABOUT THE ESAS PLAN (PUBLISHED AT THE END OF 2005) AND YOU CAN DISCOVER THAT ALL THE PROBLEMS OF THE ESAS PLAN'S DESIGN FLAWS, HIGH COSTS, VERY LONG TIMELINE, ETC. WAS ALREADY PREDICTED AND EXPLAINED 2.5 YEARS AGO !!! THE SAME FOR MY FEW POSTS ON NSF BOTH BANNED ME WHEN THEY HAVE SEEN THAT I DON'T OBEY TO THEIR DICTATS ABOUT THE OPINIONS I CAN OR I CAN'T POST (SINCE I WRITE WHAT I SAY AND I SAY WHAT I THINK) AND I'M NOT A SUPPORTER OF THEIR OWN "DIRECT- LOBBY" YOU, ALSO, HAS ALLOWED THE USERS OF YOUR BLOG TO POST INSULTS AGAINST ME WITHOUT DELETE THEM (LIKE DONE SEVERAL TIMES WITH THE LINKS TO MY "DISLIKED" ARCGUMENTS' ARTICLES...) THEN, FINALLY, YOU AND OTHER "SPACE GURU" DISCOVER THAT THE ESAS PLAN HAS LOTS OF DESIGN FLAWS... . |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
gaetanomarano wrote: JUST SEARCH AND READ MY 1500+ POSTS ON UPLINK.SPACE.COM WRITTEN IN THE LAST MONTHS OF 2005 WHEN WE HAD ONLY A FEW INFO ABOUT THE ESAS PLAN (PUBLISHED AT THE END OF 2005) AND YOU CAN DISCOVER THAT ALL THE PROBLEMS OF THE ESAS PLAN'S DESIGN FLAWS, HIGH COSTS, VERY LONG TIMELINE, ETC. WAS ALREADY PREDICTED AND EXPLAINED 2.5 YEARS AGO !!! JUST READ MY 34,996 POSTINGS AND LEARN ABOUT THE SLUTTY WOMEN WHO LIVE ON VENUS, AND THE STRANGE PEOPLE AND ANIMALS THAT INHABIT THE OTHER PLANETS AND MOONS OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM !!! ;-) PAT! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ares-1 delayed 1 year?
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:15:23 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
gaetanomarano made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 21 Gen, 14:19, (Rand Simberg) wrote: On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:55:45 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: You make heads or tails of this mess: http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20...internall.html Whoever the new president is will have to deal with this. *The first thing that I'd do is form a commission to review the "analysis" that led to ESAS. *I suspect that they'll find that the sixty-day study was extremely flawed and driven by the biases of its participants (Mike's OSC mafia and Horowitz), and that it ignored all of the data provided by the CE&R contracts. MAYBE... SOMEDAY... SOMEONE WILL ADMITS I WAS RIGHT IN ALL MY ARTICLES AND POSTS ON FORUMS AND BLOGS... JUST SEARCH AND READ MY 1500+ POSTS ON UPLINK.SPACE.COM WRITTEN IN THE LAST MONTHS OF 2005 WHEN WE HAD ONLY A FEW INFO ABOUT THE ESAS PLAN (PUBLISHED AT THE END OF 2005) AND YOU CAN DISCOVER THAT ALL THE PROBLEMS OF THE ESAS PLAN'S DESIGN FLAWS, HIGH COSTS, VERY LONG TIMELINE, ETC. WAS ALREADY PREDICTED AND EXPLAINED 2.5 YEARS AGO !!! THE SAME FOR MY FEW POSTS ON NSF BOTH BANNED ME WHEN THEY HAVE SEEN THAT I DON'T OBEY TO THEIR DICTATS ABOUT THE OPINIONS I CAN OR I CAN'T POST (SINCE I WRITE WHAT I SAY AND I SAY WHAT I THINK) AND I'M NOT A SUPPORTER OF THEIR OWN "DIRECT- LOBBY" YOU, ALSO, HAS ALLOWED THE USERS OF YOUR BLOG TO POST INSULTS AGAINST ME WITHOUT DELETE THEM (LIKE DONE SEVERAL TIMES WITH THE LINKS TO MY "DISLIKED" ARCGUMENTS' ARTICLES...) I generally allow freedom of speech on my blog. Particularly when I agree with it. THEN, FINALLY, YOU AND OTHER "SPACE GURU" DISCOVER THAT THE ESAS PLAN HAS LOTS OF DESIGN FLAWS... I've been saying that ESAS was flawed from the day it was announced, you idiot. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ares-1 delayed 1 year? | Rand Simberg[_1_] | Policy | 25 | January 22nd 08 09:05 PM |
in my opinion (both) Ares-I and Ares-V could NEVER fly once! ...could NASA rockets win vs. privates on launch date and prices? | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | May 10th 07 11:11 PM |
Ares I already delayed? | apozo | Policy | 3 | October 11th 06 04:34 AM |
ESA's ATV Delayed Another Year | Ed Kyle | Policy | 2 | November 9th 05 01:14 AM |
Shuttle delayed another year | Hallerb | Space Shuttle | 5 | September 4th 03 07:27 PM |