A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fuel tank paint



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st 05, 08:09 PM
Freddy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fuel tank paint

The first dozen or so missions had the white paint on the external fuel
tank, then NASA did away with it and gained 600 lbs in extra payload in lieu
of the paint. Wouldn't the paint serve a purpuse of holding the foam in
place??? I'm guessing that was the idea of the original designers, or else
why have it? Couldn't be only to make the whole thing a pretty unifirm
white.



  #2  
Old August 1st 05, 08:51 PM
Herb Schaltegger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:09:17 -0500, Freddy wrote
(in article ):

The first dozen or so missions had the white paint on the external fuel
tank, then NASA did away with it and gained 600 lbs in extra payload in lieu
of the paint. Wouldn't the paint serve a purpuse of holding the foam in
place??? I'm guessing that was the idea of the original designers, or else
why have it? Couldn't be only to make the whole thing a pretty unifirm
white.




It was only the first two flights and they shed foam (and paint
fragments) anyway.

--
"Fame may be fleeting but obscurity is forever." ~Anonymous
"I believe as little as possible and know as much as I can."
~Todd Stuart Phillips
www.angryherb.net

  #3  
Old August 1st 05, 11:54 PM
Rick Nelson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Shouldn't they paint the ET with teflonized black paint so that all the
ice would be shed before launch?

DOH,

Rick



Herb Schaltegger wrote:
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:09:17 -0500, Freddy wrote
(in article ):


The first dozen or so missions had the white paint on the external fuel
tank, then NASA did away with it and gained 600 lbs in extra payload in lieu
of the paint. Wouldn't the paint serve a purpuse of holding the foam in
place??? I'm guessing that was the idea of the original designers, or else
why have it? Couldn't be only to make the whole thing a pretty unifirm
white.





It was only the first two flights and they shed foam (and paint
fragments) anyway.

  #4  
Old August 2nd 05, 03:22 AM
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Freddy" wrote in message
.. .
The first dozen or so missions had the white paint on the external fuel
tank, then NASA did away with it and gained 600 lbs in extra payload in

lieu
of the paint. Wouldn't the paint serve a purpuse of holding the foam in
place??? I'm guessing that was the idea of the original designers, or else
why have it? Couldn't be only to make the whole thing a pretty unifirm
white.


Sort of. Really it was for thermal control and to keep the foam from being
exposed to the sun for long periods of time.

So the "uniform white" was for a reason.







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Shuttle Discovery Heads Back to Hangar to Have a New and Safer Fuel Tank Installed Andrew Space Shuttle 0 May 26th 05 06:58 PM
NASA Finishes Redesigned Shuttle Fuel Tank Jim deGriz Space Shuttle 0 December 28th 04 11:33 PM
Media invited to see Shuttle External Fuel Tank ship from Mishoud Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 1 December 28th 04 10:41 PM
Scrapping Scram sanman Policy 28 November 7th 04 06:24 PM
Rockets not carrying fuel. Robert Clark Technology 3 August 7th 03 01:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.