|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
Today's landing ground tracks.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html First opportunity http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1...SC238_long.gif |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
"Craig Fink" wrote in message ... Today's landing ground tracks. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html First opportunity http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1...SC238_long.gif Safe landing. It will be interesting to see how the three suspect RCC panels fared. Jeff -- "When transportation is cheap, frequent, reliable, and flexible, everything else becomes easier." - Jon Goff |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
Jeff Findley beweerde :
"Craig Fink" wrote in message ... Today's landing ground tracks. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html First opportunity http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1...SC238_long.gif Safe landing. It will be interesting to see how the three suspect RCC panels fared. Jeff The landing was near perfect, allthough I think I saw the thouchdown was pretty rough. It looked as if Discovery 'dropped' in the runway from about 1-2 meters high... Anyone saw the same? André |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
André, PE1PQX writes:
Jeff Findley beweerde : "Craig Fink" wrote in message ... Today's landing ground tracks. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html First opportunity http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1...SC238_long.gif Safe landing. It will be interesting to see how the three suspect RCC panels fared. Jeff The landing was near perfect, allthough I think I saw the thouchdown was pretty rough. It looked as if Discovery 'dropped' in the runway from about 1-2 meters high... Anyone saw the same? Yeah, it appeared a bit more abrupt than usual and more tiresmoke than usual. But if I remember the wx calls correctly, they were dealing with a head wind that was gusting on em, though, and maybe it just...got ungusty in a hurry and flop came teh brick. :-) Any way ya slice, it, it's friggin amazing they can get that brick safely on the ground without exploding the tires all over creation. I can't imagine having to fly a "glider" with that profile and weight. Welcome home STS-120 -- couldn't be more proud of ya. -- Todd H. http://toddh.net/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
"Todd H." wrote in message ... André, PE1PQX writes: Jeff Findley beweerde : "Craig Fink" wrote in message ... Today's landing ground tracks. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html First opportunity http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/1...SC238_long.gif Safe landing. It will be interesting to see how the three suspect RCC panels fared. Jeff The landing was near perfect, allthough I think I saw the thouchdown was pretty rough. It looked as if Discovery 'dropped' in the runway from about 1-2 meters high... Anyone saw the same? Yeah, it appeared a bit more abrupt than usual and more tiresmoke than usual. But if I remember the wx calls correctly, they were dealing with a head wind that was gusting on em, though, and maybe it just...got ungusty in a hurry and flop came teh brick. :-) Any way ya slice, it, it's friggin amazing they can get that brick safely on the ground without exploding the tires all over creation. I can't imagine having to fly a "glider" with that profile and weight. Welcome home STS-120 -- couldn't be more proud of ya. Yes, probably just a drop in the headwind during the hold-off. Looked pretty good to me |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
Het is zò dat MichaelJP formuleerde :
"Todd H." wrote in message ... André, PE1PQX writes: Jeff Findley beweerde : http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html The landing was near perfect, allthough I think I saw the thouchdown was pretty rough. It looked as if Discovery 'dropped' in the runway from about 1-2 meters high... Anyone saw the same? Yeah, it appeared a bit more abrupt than usual and more tiresmoke than usual. But if I remember the wx calls correctly, they were dealing with a head wind that was gusting on em, though, and maybe it just...got ungusty in a hurry and flop came teh brick. :-) Any way ya slice, it, it's friggin amazing they can get that brick safely on the ground without exploding the tires all over creation. I can't imagine having to fly a "glider" with that profile and weight. Welcome home STS-120 -- couldn't be more proud of ya. Yes, probably just a drop in the headwind during the hold-off. Looked pretty good to me I think your'e right, a drop in headwind could cause this 'dropping on the runway' (I'm not an aeronautical engineer or an engineer at all) but I'd like to know what the forces are the landing gears had to endure during this landing, and if there is any structural damage on the gear at all. André PS.: I agree: Welcome home STS-120 from a job well done! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Deorbit completed, landing in 60 minutes
André, PE1PQX writes:
Het is zò dat MichaelJP formuleerde : "Todd H." wrote in message ... André, PE1PQX writes: Jeff Findley beweerde : http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sh...s/landing.html The landing was near perfect, allthough I think I saw the thouchdown was pretty rough. It looked as if Discovery 'dropped' in the runway from about 1-2 meters high... Anyone saw the same? Yeah, it appeared a bit more abrupt than usual and more tiresmoke than usual. But if I remember the wx calls correctly, they were dealing with a head wind that was gusting on em, though, and maybe it just...got ungusty in a hurry and flop came teh brick. :-) Any way ya slice, it, it's friggin amazing they can get that brick safely on the ground without exploding the tires all over creation. I can't imagine having to fly a "glider" with that profile and weight. Welcome home STS-120 -- couldn't be more proud of ya. Yes, probably just a drop in the headwind during the hold-off. Looked pretty good to me I think your'e right, a drop in headwind could cause this 'dropping on the runway' (I'm not an aeronautical engineer or an engineer at all) but I'd like to know what the forces are the landing gears had to endure during this landing, and if there is any structural damage on the gear at all. André PS.: I agree: Welcome home STS-120 from a job well done! I got another look at landing videos, and the view from behind the craft as it lands does show the elevons (assuming that's the right name for the control surface on the wings) get controlled downward just a second before the plop. That may have been a reaction to some headwind change, still. She did stick the landing, by god. :-) As I recall the prior shuttle landing I saw was a lot less pretty--I'm not sure the wheels got down at the same time and there was almost a bounce. Very exciting mission, and glad to hear the vehicle was so clean. Woot! -- Todd H. http://toddh.net/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Expedition 12/ Pontes Deorbit Burn and Landing | John | Space Station | 0 | April 9th 06 06:06 AM |
My Observatory is Nearly Completed | Davoud | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | November 12th 04 03:46 AM |
New CEV Design Completed | ed kyle | Policy | 4 | September 24th 04 01:24 AM |
SOI - engine burn completed! | Victor | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | July 1st 04 07:09 PM |
If you have a fast internet connection... Another Six Minutes of Terrorin 45 minutes | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | January 26th 04 04:49 AM |