![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16-11-28 03:45 , JF Mezei wrote:
On 2016-11-27 18:14, William Mook wrote: Since the anaerobic digester is likely to weigh more than 2.03 kg its inclusion in the process is a net negative. Fair enough. But since there will have to be some sort of sceptic tank somewhere, the weight of that digester is mostly already there on the ship. Unless the toilets vent to space. I happened to notice that the ESA has issued an Invitation To Tender for a project called "Biomass Propulsion Subsystem" (ESA ITT AO70236). However, on closer reading it (sadly) turns out to be unrelated to this thread, because what they want is an ordinary propulsion subsystem for a satellite called BIOMASS. :-) -- Niklas Holsti Tidorum Ltd niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ . |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Novel Lorentz propulsion for interplanetary and interstellar propulsion. | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 5 | August 24th 11 11:14 PM |
ot well that was a waste of time | Brian Gaff | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 17th 09 07:20 AM |
Waste not! | prof-rabbit | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 09 10:33 AM |
Such a Waste of Energy | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | July 28th 06 08:04 PM |
So far Titan a waste | starlard | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | August 10th 04 09:34 PM |