|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
This article makes me wonder:
SPACE.com -- Fast-Spinning Star on Verge of Breaking Apart ""Alpha Arae is very close to its breakup velocity, and the matter may freely escape the equatorial regions, 'launched' by the centrifugal force, as if you were on a crazy merry-go-round," lead researcher Philippe Stee of the Observatory of Côte d'Azur in France, told SPACE.com." http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...star_spin.html So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of breaking up, it would stand to reason that there were stars that spun so fast that they went over that critical limit. My question would be, so what happened to those stars? Did those stars spin away enough of their outer layers to the point where they became much smaller-diameter stars, at which point they could exist in equilibrium again because they were no longer at critical speed? Or did they just completely fling their gas away until they became just a big cloud of gas again? Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
"bbbl67" wrote in message oups.com... This article makes me wonder: SPACE.com -- Fast-Spinning Star on Verge of Breaking Apart ""Alpha Arae is very close to its breakup velocity, and the matter may freely escape the equatorial regions, 'launched' by the centrifugal force, as if you were on a crazy merry-go-round," lead researcher Philippe Stee of the Observatory of Côte d'Azur in France, told SPACE.com." http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...star_spin.html So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of breaking up, it would stand to reason that there were stars that spun so fast that they went over that critical limit. My question would be, so what happened to those stars? Did those stars spin away enough of their outer layers to the point where they became much smaller-diameter stars, at which point they could exist in equilibrium again because they were no longer at critical speed? Or did they just completely fling their gas away until they became just a big cloud of gas again? Yousuf Khan http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...lgol/Algol.htm Androcles |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
In article .com,
"bbbl67" writes: http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...star_spin.html The preprint is at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0606404 So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of breaking up, it would stand to reason that there were stars that spun so fast that they went over that critical limit. How could they form? An accretion disk spinning at breakup isn't going to let matter drop down onto a stellar surface. Did those stars spin away enough of their outer layers to the point where they became much smaller-diameter stars If some external force "spins up" a star, it starts losing mass from its equator. If the ejected mass couples to the star, either through viscosity or magnetic fields, angular momentum can be transported outwards, and the star will slow down. If there is no coupling, then mass loss continues until the star's radius falls below the critical value. -- Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA (Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial email may be sent to your ISP.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
Steve Willner wrote:
So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of breaking up, it would stand to reason that there were stars that spun so fast that they went over that critical limit. How could they form? An accretion disk spinning at breakup isn't going to let matter drop down onto a stellar surface. Perhaps a momentum boost from another passing star? Did those stars spin away enough of their outer layers to the point where they became much smaller-diameter stars If some external force "spins up" a star, it starts losing mass from its equator. If the ejected mass couples to the star, either through viscosity or magnetic fields, angular momentum can be transported outwards, and the star will slow down. If there is no coupling, then mass loss continues until the star's radius falls below the critical value. Okay, so it sounds like the star simply gets smaller in diameter. Yousuf Khan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of
breaking up,... SW How could they form? In article , Yousuf Khan writes: Perhaps a momentum boost from another passing star? I don't think a mere close passage will work. It's very difficult for one star to apply a torque to the other. A binary merger might do it, though. SW If some external force "spins up" a star, it starts losing mass from SW its equator. If the ejected mass couples to the star, either through SW viscosity or magnetic fields, angular momentum can be transported SW outwards, and the star will slow down. If there is no coupling, then SW mass loss continues until the star's radius falls below the critical SW value. Okay, so it sounds like the star simply gets smaller in diameter. I think coupling by viscous forces is more likely, but I could easily be wrong. It's not as though there are lots of examples to study. The real result probably depends on the exact details of the merger. Come to think of it, this process may be relevant for "blue stragglers." I bet somebody has tried to calculate models for those, but I don't know for sure. If not, there's a dandy PhD thesis waiting to be written. -- Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA (Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial email may be sent to your ISP.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
"Steve Willner" wrote in message ... | So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of | breaking up,... | | SW How could they form? | | In article , | Yousuf Khan writes: | Perhaps a momentum boost from another passing star? | | I don't think a mere close passage will work. It's very difficult | for one star to apply a torque to the other. A binary merger might | do it, though. | | SW If some external force "spins up" a star, it starts losing mass from | SW its equator. If the ejected mass couples to the star, either through | SW viscosity or magnetic fields, angular momentum can be transported | SW outwards, and the star will slow down. If there is no coupling, then | SW mass loss continues until the star's radius falls below the critical | SW value. | | Okay, so it sounds like the star simply gets smaller in diameter. | | I think coupling by viscous forces is more likely, but I could easily | be wrong. It's not as though there are lots of examples to study. | The real result probably depends on the exact details of the merger. | Come to think of it, this process may be relevant for "blue | stragglers." I bet somebody has tried to calculate models for those, | but I don't know for sure. If not, there's a dandy PhD thesis | waiting to be written. That's all it's about, writing crap nobody can prove or disprove. You even get Nobel prizes that way. http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...lgol/Algol.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
"Steve Willner" wrote in message ... So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of breaking up,... SW How could they form? In article , Yousuf Khan writes: Perhaps a momentum boost from another passing star? I don't think a mere close passage will work. It's very difficult for one star to apply a torque to the other. A binary merger might do it, though. SW If some external force "spins up" a star, it starts losing mass from SW its equator. If the ejected mass couples to the star, either through SW viscosity or magnetic fields, angular momentum can be transported SW outwards, and the star will slow down. If there is no coupling, then SW mass loss continues until the star's radius falls below the critical SW value. Okay, so it sounds like the star simply gets smaller in diameter. I think coupling by viscous forces is more likely, but I could easily be wrong. It's not as though there are lots of examples to study. The real result probably depends on the exact details of the merger. Come to think of it, this process may be relevant for "blue stragglers." I bet somebody has tried to calculate models for those, but I don't know for sure. If not, there's a dandy PhD thesis waiting to be written. Surely this would be the fate of grazing binaries and isn't it highly likely they would get tidally locked before merger? These appear relevant: http://tinyurl.com/n4xe6 http://tinyurl.com/nm87j George |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Superfast spinning stars
"George Dishman" wrote in message ... | | "Steve Willner" wrote in message | ... | So if there are stars spinning so fast that they are on the verge of | breaking up,... | | SW How could they form? | | In article , | Yousuf Khan writes: | Perhaps a momentum boost from another passing star? | | I don't think a mere close passage will work. It's very difficult | for one star to apply a torque to the other. A binary merger might | do it, though. | | SW If some external force "spins up" a star, it starts losing mass from | SW its equator. If the ejected mass couples to the star, either through | SW viscosity or magnetic fields, angular momentum can be transported | SW outwards, and the star will slow down. If there is no coupling, then | SW mass loss continues until the star's radius falls below the critical | SW value. | | Okay, so it sounds like the star simply gets smaller in diameter. | | I think coupling by viscous forces is more likely, but I could easily | be wrong. It's not as though there are lots of examples to study. | The real result probably depends on the exact details of the merger. | Come to think of it, this process may be relevant for "blue | stragglers." I bet somebody has tried to calculate models for those, | but I don't know for sure. If not, there's a dandy PhD thesis | waiting to be written. | | Surely this would be the fate of grazing binaries | and isn't it highly likely they would get tidally | locked before merger? These appear relevant: | | http://tinyurl.com/n4xe6 Cookies Required for Access Your web browser must accept cookies to access this free content. Please enable cookies before clicking continue. For more information on cookies, please consult your browser's help index. | | http://tinyurl.com/nm87j | | George | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pioneer : Anomaly Still Anonymous | Joe Jakarta | Astronomy Misc | 613 | August 25th 06 07:20 PM |
[sci.astro] Stars (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (7/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:35 PM |
Observing Report - December 28, 2003: Horsehead and Much More | Craig Levine | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | December 29th 03 10:36 PM |
[obs] Lucy looks Skywards 23/09/2003 | Morgoth | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 29th 03 02:39 AM |