#1
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
Hi all,
I have a question. I've been increasingly frustrated lately that I can't find up-to-date separations and position angles on tight doubles with fast orbits. Even information a year or two old is no good when you want to know about Gamma Virginis or Xi Scorpii. I've tried my planetarium programs. I've tried searching the web for the WDS catalog, but I'm either reading it wrong or it too uses old information and we're supposed to know how to extrapolate or something. Is there a program or website where I can simply look up any given double star and get exact info for now, tonight? Thanks in advance. Scott Ewart |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
Scott wrote:
Hi all, I have a question. I've been increasingly frustrated lately that I can't find up-to-date separations and position angles on tight doubles with fast orbits. Even information a year or two old is no good when you want to know about Gamma Virginis or Xi Scorpii. I've tried my planetarium programs. I've tried searching the web for the WDS catalog, but I'm either reading it wrong or it too uses old information and we're supposed to know how to extrapolate or something. Is there a program or website where I can simply look up any given double star and get exact info for now, tonight? Thanks in advance. Scott Ewart Try: http://www.obs-besancon.fr/www/sdg/etoiles_ang.html http://www.edu-observatory.org/eo/double_stars.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
Hi Scott,
Scott wrote: Hi all, I have a question. I've been increasingly frustrated lately that I can't find up-to-date separations and position angles on tight doubles with fast orbits. Even information a year or two old is no good when you want to know about Gamma Virginis or Xi Scorpii. I've tried my planetarium programs. I've tried searching the web for the WDS catalog, but I'm either reading it wrong or it too uses old information and we're supposed to know how to extrapolate or something. These systems require orbits to compute the accurate positions. The only commercial "planetarium" software I am aware of that uses orbits to compute the positions of multiple star components is my SkyTools. It gives a separation of 0.71" and a PA of 222 for tonight (July 10, 2003). By the way, SkyTools also plots the relative positions of the stars on the charts, can overlay the orbit, computes orbit ephemerides, and will even give you a Dawes-limit based simulation of the pair in your telescope... http://www.skyhound.com/skytools.html Clear skies, Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
Greg Crinklaw wrote:
It gives a separation of 0.71" and a PA of 222 for tonight (July 10, 2003). That was for Gamma Vir by the way... Greg -- Greg Crinklaw Astronomical Software Developer Cloudcroft, New Mexico, USA (33N, 106W, 2700m) SkyTools Software for the Observer: http://www.skyhound.com/cs.html Skyhound Observing Pages: http://www.skyhound.com/sh/skyhound.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
S From: "Scott"
S Subject: Double Stars S Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:29:55 -0400 S Organization: OWDS Inc. There is an Excel file of binary star orbits -- hipe some one here gives the address! -- which caclks the aspect for a given epoch. Being a clear file, you can update the elements or add other stars. It also plots the orbit on a neat diagram. By the sheerest of good luck, last week I acquired an iPaq handheld computer which I then loaded with Taiyoukei. Uh, that's a Japanese astronomy freeware, all in English except for the title, which includes a selection of WDS binaties. When fou run the program it calcks the aspect for the instant wpoch, altho you can shift to an other date. In addition, the program plots the orbit and geneates a tabular ephemris. The downsides are that it's only for handhelds with WIndows CE and that most of the stars are REAL close binaries, even, I susect, spectroscopic ones. Some planetarium programs, like Guide, include a binary star calculator. I would hpe you get the Excel file if any one here gts u the address. S Hi all, S I have a question. I've been increasingly frustrated lately that I S can't find up-to-date separations and position angles on tight doubles with S fast orbits. Even information a year or two old is no good when you want to S know about Gamma Virginis or Xi Scorpii. I've tried my planetarium S programs. I've tried searching the web for the WDS catalog, but I'm either S reading it wrong or it too uses old information and we're supposed to know S how to extrapolate or something. S Is there a program or website where I can simply look up any given S double star and get exact info for now, tonight? S Thanks in advance. --- þ RoseReader 2.52á P005004 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
GC From: Greg Crinklaw
GC Subject: Double Stars GC Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:23:05 -0600 GC Organization: CapellaSoft GC GC It gives a separation of 0.71" and a PA of 222 for tonight (July 10, GC 2003). GC GC That was for Gamma Vir by the way... The taiyoukei program, using WDS data, gives 0.75 arcsec and 227 degrees, rounded. However!, gamma Virginis DOES have some orbit problems in that there are several orbits in circulation for it. This topic came up a couple years ago when we woke up to the coming periastron of this star. See my article in Eyepiece for April 2000. When you look at gaama Virginis, know that you're seeing just the second periastron of this star ever observed. You may want to rad the sccounts of the first one, in 1835 when vinary star astronomy was still quite new, and hear the excitement. --- þ RoseReader 2.52á P005004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Double Stars
In article , Scott wrote:
Hi all, I have a question. I've been increasingly frustrated lately that I can't find up-to-date separations and position angles on tight doubles with fast orbits. Even information a year or two old is no good when you want to know about Gamma Virginis or Xi Scorpii. I've tried my planetarium programs. I've tried searching the web for the WDS catalog, but I'm either reading it wrong or it too uses old information and we're supposed to know how to extrapolate or something. Is there a program or website where I can simply look up any given double star and get exact info for now, tonight? Though not quite that, these people seem to have computed annual ephemerides of about 1300 visual binaries out through about 2007: http://www.usc.es/astro/catalog.htm Some stars have more than one prediction where there are multiple sets of proposed orbital elements. It's a big ASCII tabular list, arranged so that you could write a program to read it. They don't seem to have a star-lookup web service, nor an interpolator to a specific date. Stars are given by WDS number (based on J2000 coordinates, e.g. 37 Pegasi is "22300+0426"), with ADS number and often one other synonym, though not all possible cross-references. E.g. the name "37 Peg" doesn't appear in 22300+0426's list of aliases. Still it looks awfully useful. A scan for short-period wide pairs turned up one amazing candidate which seems to have a typo: 00184+4401 a.k.a. "GRB" (Groombridge) 34 AB, mags 8 and 11, period "2.600" years, semimajor axis 41.15". Here's a snippet of its ephemeris (date, PA, sep) -- they've tabulated it at .25 year intervals since the period is so short: 2003.00 121.1 20.174 2003.25 182.9 25.883 2003.50 211.2 37.568 2003.75 228.6 40.919 2004.00 248.3 33.457 2004.25 288.1 21.512 You could probably see this one move from week to week! .... but not really. Other references give Groombridge 34's period as 2600 years, not 2.6 years. Stuart Levy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sun-Like Binary Stars Lose Their Companions (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 17th 04 02:05 AM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 21st 03 06:10 PM |
Stars rich in heavy metals tend to harbor planets, astronomers report(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 21st 03 05:45 PM |