|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 19:30:36 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous
wrote: Would somebody please talk about the idea that there is only one electron, and that it is bombing around the universe making us think there are lots of it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe John Wheeler's interesting idea as brought out by Richard Feynman when he mentioned it in his Nobel lecture. Wheeler proposed that there exists only a single electron in the universe, propagating through space and time in such a way as to appear in many places simultaneously. Just shows what thinking too much about quantum mechanics will do to your brain. g -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Procrastination is crucial; procrastinate now - don't put it off." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On Nov 3, 2:28*am, Painius wrote:
On Fri, *2 Nov 2012 19:30:36 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote: Would somebody please talk about the idea that there is only one electron, and that it is bombing around the universe making us think there are lots of it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe John Wheeler's interesting idea as brought out by Richard Feynman when he mentioned it in his Nobel lecture. *Wheeler proposed that there exists only a single electron in the universe, propagating through space and time in such a way as to appear in many places simultaneously. Just shows what thinking too much about quantum mechanics will do to your brain. *g -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Procrastination is crucial; procrastinate now - don't put it off." One electron idea was kicked around for fun thinking. Both knew it would take instant action over any distance,and that went against GR,and SR TreBert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote: On Nov 3, 2:28*am, Painius wrote: On Fri, *2 Nov 2012 19:30:36 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous wrote: Would somebody please talk about the idea that there is only one electron, and that it is bombing around the universe making us think there are lots of it? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe John Wheeler's interesting idea as brought out by Richard Feynman when he mentioned it in his Nobel lecture. *Wheeler proposed that there exists only a single electron in the universe, propagating through space and time in such a way as to appear in many places simultaneously. Just shows what thinking too much about quantum mechanics will do to your brain. *g One electron idea was kicked around for fun thinking. Both knew it would take instant action over any distance,and that went against GR,and SR TreBert And now that quantum "instant action over any distance" has been shown to be a reality, should we bring the "one-electron Universe" back? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Procrastination is crucial; procrastinate now - don't put it off." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On 11/4/2012 12:51 PM, Painius wrote:
One electron idea was kicked around for fun thinking. Both knew it would take instant action over any distance,and that went against GR,and SR TreBert And now that quantum "instant action over any distance" has been shown to be a reality, should we bring the "one-electron Universe" back? Ya. That will fix everything. Wait... What was broken again? -- "I'm Harlow Campbell and I approved this message" "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On Nov 4, 9:51*am, Painius wrote:
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" One electron idea was kicked around for fun thinking. Both knew it would take instant action over any distance,and that went against GR,and SR * TreBert And now that quantum "instant action over any distance" has been shown to be a reality, should we bring the "one-electron Universe" back? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Procrastination is crucial; procrastinate now - don't put it off." The "one electron universe" is a funny way of attempting to make any sense out of our 3D cosmic soup that is different in every direction and over any given distance. Since supposedly us industrial humans of mass consumption were not around when those previous ice ages melted, perhaps those pesky cosmological ice ages could be discussed with some consideration, as to the nearby stars contributing and/or taking away energy that makes our planet a little colder or hotter from time to time. Just the erosion of surface strata that is truly remarkable in so many ways, that are still not understood as to how such complex layers of surface geology were formed, disrupted and reformed only to get eroded over and over (mainly configured and badly eroded since the last ice age having suddenly terminated as of only 11,712 years ago) means that our planet was an extremely active place for the last few hundred million years while nearby Sirius was forming and burning through its enormous cache of fuel. Is this a coincidence or merely random cosmic happenstance fate? https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:23:10 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth
wrote: On Nov 4, 9:51*am, Painius wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" One electron idea was kicked around for fun thinking. Both knew it would take instant action over any distance,and that went against GR,and SR * TreBert And now that quantum "instant action over any distance" has been shown to be a reality, should we bring the "one-electron Universe" back? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance The "one electron universe" is a funny way of attempting to make any sense out of our 3D cosmic soup that is different in every direction and over any given distance. Since supposedly us industrial humans of mass consumption were not around when those previous ice ages melted, perhaps those pesky cosmological ice ages could be discussed with some consideration, as to the nearby stars contributing and/or taking away energy that makes our planet a little colder or hotter from time to time. Just the erosion of surface strata that is truly remarkable in so many ways, that are still not understood as to how such complex layers of surface geology were formed, disrupted and reformed only to get eroded over and over (mainly configured and badly eroded since the last ice age having suddenly terminated as of only 11,712 years ago) means that our planet was an extremely active place for the last few hundred million years while nearby Sirius was forming and burning through its enormous cache of fuel. Is this a coincidence or merely random cosmic happenstance fate? Generally, I would go with "coincidence", except I don't believe in 'em. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Life's greatest risk is never daring to risk." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On Nov 8, 2:13*am, Painius wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:23:10 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 4, 9:51 am, Painius wrote: On Sat, 3 Nov 2012 05:31:51 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2" One electron idea was kicked around for fun thinking. Both knew it would take instant action over any distance,and that went against GR,and SR TreBert And now that quantum "instant action over any distance" has been shown to be a reality, should we bring the "one-electron Universe" back? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_at_a_distance The "one electron universe" is a funny way of attempting to make any sense out of our 3D cosmic soup that is different in every direction and over any given distance. Since supposedly us industrial humans of mass consumption were not around when those previous ice ages melted, perhaps those pesky cosmological ice ages could be discussed with some consideration, as to the nearby stars contributing and/or taking away energy that makes our planet a little colder or hotter from time to time. Just the erosion of surface strata that is truly remarkable in so many ways, that are still not understood as to how such complex layers of surface geology were formed, disrupted and reformed only to get eroded over and over (mainly configured and badly eroded since the last ice age having suddenly terminated as of only 11,712 years ago) means that our planet was an extremely active place for the last few hundred million years while nearby Sirius was forming and burning through its enormous cache of fuel. Is this a coincidence or merely random cosmic happenstance fate? Generally, I would go with "coincidence", except I don't believe in 'em. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Life's greatest risk is never daring to risk." In the near future that likely no remaining humans will ever get to experience, when those Sirius stars once again pass really nearby (perhaps getting within a light year), is when all of our Oort cloud items will become disrupted for a few thousand years. Of course this should also cause the bulk of glacial ice on Earth to melt and our planet become a mostly water world, with only the most elevated and polar terrain offering any remainders of ice. The really good news is that diatoms and many other forms of complex ocean life should thrive, except for species existing above water with the cosmic radiation from Sirius(b) and that of our naked moon, plus those 1e15 kg CMEs could turn out being rather problematic. It's hard to imagine what the enormous and massive(2.5e37 kg) nebula cloud which only recently(300 some odd million years ago) created them nearby stars, did to our solar system that was probably engulfed by some of the same cosmic molecular stuff for many thousands of years while those and possibly a few other stars and numerous planets were getting created. That is sort of a nifty coincidence, with lots of cosmic what-ifs and possibilities. Perhaps our cosmological ice-ages did not really get going until that nebula cloud was encountered. https://groups.google.com/forum/m/ http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nature made you, Painus.
On 11/8/2012 5:13 AM, Painius wrote:
Is this a coincidence or merely random cosmic happenstance fate? Generally, I would go with "coincidence", except I don't believe in 'em. Because you are too busy believing in a 'non-trivial' god. (What? You thought I forgot?) -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Painus Will Run Away | Painius[_1_] | Misc | 0 | June 20th 12 07:19 AM |