A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Poll about astronautics (french by easy)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 8th 06, 12:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.space,sci.astro.amateur,sci.space.station
canopus56[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 556
Default Poll about astronautics (french by easy)

Thierry wrote:
"canopus56" wrote in message
...

snip As you say, there are not many difference between US and
Europe in this regard. All depend in fact on the current activity of the
space program as you showed. snip
However, when there is a stop in the program for any reason or when a new
program is scheduled (e.g. Constellation), then again medai and people are
all behind astronauts waiting the next hero.


I feel public support is caused by ongoing discoveries that are
accessible by the public and not by astronauts becoming herioc media
celebrities. Niel Armstrong personal modesty with respect to his
historic role of being the Christopher Colombus of the Moon is a case
in point. Public support for the space program in 1990s through 2005
has more to do with images being regularly returned and distributed by
the Great Observatories like the Hubble and Spitzer space telecopes and
robotic missions like Cassini, Gallileo and the Mars rovers. The 50%
of the public supporting space exploration understand that it is
long-term endeavor and is a necessary expression of the human spirit of
exploration. The human need for exploration is why 50% of American and
French citizen support space expenditures, even though it might take
away from necessary social program spending.

The danger to public support for NASA is too much emphasis on manned
exploration.

At $8 billion U.S. a piece for two lost shuttles and $700 million U.S.
to make a delivery to the International Space Station using the
shuttle, there will be a limit to that public support after a
catastropic spacecraft losses. We need both - manned missions and
robotic - but the current U.S. administration's committment is to
support only one or the other while reducing inflation adjusted funding
for both. If shuttles cost $100-200 million U.S. and only $50 million
per launch, public opinion might be different.

If NASA's budget is concentrated in manned exploration and there is a
catestrophic loss of spacecraft and astronaut life, it is easier for
politicians to call for the entire program's cancellation. If there
is catestropic loss of a Constellation-Orion, it will be missions like
the Mars Reconnisance Orbiter (MRO), the Mars Rovers and Cassini that
will keep the agency afloat in public opinion.

Looks like the 2007 NASA budget ratio is 0.6% - 16.3B / 2770B = 0.6%
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/tables.html

- Canopus56

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
End of Easy SETI CLI Marcel Zuiderveld SETI 6 June 30th 04 06:14 AM
Colonizing the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps Immortalist Policy 52 June 17th 04 02:02 AM
Cheap, easy to handle fuels/oxidizers Earl Colby Pottinger Technology 41 December 23rd 03 02:04 AM
French's Primordial Study greywolf42 Astronomy Misc 8 September 16th 03 07:53 PM
EVA inspection of STS-107 was "easy" possible [email protected] History 17 July 14th 03 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.