#191
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 7:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 14, 9:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 12:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Take a look at the image on the right he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnu...f_the_universe Now, I know you are going to say there is another Universal jet in the image. However, I am pointing out that we have no evidence it exists. We also have no evidence there is a Universal black hole with two polar jets. What we have evidence of is the Universal jet we exist in. I'm not saying there is, or isn't an opposite Universal jet, just that we have no evidence of it. But we can honestly surmise that it most likely does exist, and because it's going directly away from us at 'c' is why it or any of its aether jet flow will never be detected, not to mention the extreme distance of its molecular universe being hundreds of billions or even conceivably trillions of light years away from us by now. For all we know with any objective certainty is that a quantum singularity particle seems to exist at the time a given wave is detected, but there's still nothing objectively proving that each individual wave and its associated particle are one and the very same as provided by the original source wave and its associated particle, just like the electron entering one end of any given wire is simply not the same electron that emerges out or is taken from the other end of that copper conductor. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? The C-60 molecule fired at the slits in a double slit experiment is the same C-60 molecule detected after interacting with the slits. The C-60 molecule travels a well defined path and the associated wave in the aether passes through all of the slits. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? Do you understand in a double slit experiment, the proton, neutron, atom or molecule moves? Are you able to understand the proton, neutron, atom or molecule travels a well defined path which takes it through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both? |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 5:08*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 14, 9:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 12:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Take a look at the image on the right he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnu...f_the_universe Now, I know you are going to say there is another Universal jet in the image. However, I am pointing out that we have no evidence it exists. We also have no evidence there is a Universal black hole with two polar jets. What we have evidence of is the Universal jet we exist in. I'm not saying there is, or isn't an opposite Universal jet, just that we have no evidence of it. But we can honestly surmise that it most likely does exist, and because it's going directly away from us at 'c' is why it or any of its aether jet flow will never be detected, not to mention the extreme distance of its molecular universe being hundreds of billions or even conceivably trillions of light years away from us by now. For all we know with any objective certainty is that a quantum singularity particle seems to exist at the time a given wave is detected, but there's still nothing objectively proving that each individual wave and its associated particle are one and the very same as provided by the original source wave and its associated particle, just like the electron entering one end of any given wire is simply not the same electron that emerges out or is taken from the other end of that copper conductor. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? The C-60 molecule fired at the slits in a double slit experiment is the same C-60 molecule detected after interacting with the slits. The C-60 molecule travels a well defined path and the associated wave in the aether passes through all of the slits. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? I think of Cern and Cern is your answer (faster * TreBet No, that's pure hogwash. Electrons moving in a conductor is entirely than Cern, |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 5:29*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 14, 9:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 12:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Take a look at the image on the right he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnu...f_the_universe Now, I know you are going to say there is another Universal jet in the image. However, I am pointing out that we have no evidence it exists. We also have no evidence there is a Universal black hole with two polar jets. What we have evidence of is the Universal jet we exist in. I'm not saying there is, or isn't an opposite Universal jet, just that we have no evidence of it. But we can honestly surmise that it most likely does exist, and because it's going directly away from us at 'c' is why it or any of its aether jet flow will never be detected, not to mention the extreme distance of its molecular universe being hundreds of billions or even conceivably trillions of light years away from us by now. For all we know with any objective certainty is that a quantum singularity particle seems to exist at the time a given wave is detected, but there's still nothing objectively proving that each individual wave and its associated particle are one and the very same as provided by the original source wave and its associated particle, just like the electron entering one end of any given wire is simply not the same electron that emerges out or is taken from the other end of that copper conductor. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? The C-60 molecule fired at the slits in a double slit experiment is the same C-60 molecule detected after interacting with the slits. The C-60 molecule travels a well defined path and the associated wave in the aether passes through all of the slits. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? Do you understand in a double slit experiment, the proton, neutron, atom or molecule moves? Are you able to understand the proton, neutron, atom or molecule travels a well defined path which takes it through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both? At least I'm able to ask an honest question that you can't seem to answer. |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 5:08*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 14, 9:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 12:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Take a look at the image on the right he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnu...f_the_universe Now, I know you are going to say there is another Universal jet in the image. However, I am pointing out that we have no evidence it exists. We also have no evidence there is a Universal black hole with two polar jets. What we have evidence of is the Universal jet we exist in. I'm not saying there is, or isn't an opposite Universal jet, just that we have no evidence of it. But we can honestly surmise that it most likely does exist, and because it's going directly away from us at 'c' is why it or any of its aether jet flow will never be detected, not to mention the extreme distance of its molecular universe being hundreds of billions or even conceivably trillions of light years away from us by now. For all we know with any objective certainty is that a quantum singularity particle seems to exist at the time a given wave is detected, but there's still nothing objectively proving that each individual wave and its associated particle are one and the very same as provided by the original source wave and its associated particle, just like the electron entering one end of any given wire is simply not the same electron that emerges out or is taken from the other end of that copper conductor. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? The C-60 molecule fired at the slits in a double slit experiment is the same C-60 molecule detected after interacting with the slits. The C-60 molecule travels a well defined path and the associated wave in the aether passes through all of the slits. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? I think of Cern and Cern is your answer (faster * TreBet “What is the conductivity speed of electrons in a superconductor?“ It is a bit of a misconception that electrons move at the speed of electricity through a wire. Electricity moves move like a wave, with many electrons moving as a direct result of the movement of other nearby electrons. In a typical piece of copper wire, the Electrons themselves only reach speeds of about 2 cm per second, depending on the amount of current present. In a super conductor, the electrons are "free", meaning they are not bound to their individual atoms or molecules. In this case, with a similar amount of current, the electrons would not move any faster than in a normal piece of wire. However, because of the ease of moving electricity through a super conductive wire, a much smaller piece of wire can be used. (Imagine if you could move all the water in a fire hose through a drinking straw!) Now the more limited number of electrons would have to move faster, though their actual physical speed is still a function of just how much current passes through the wire. Ryan B.lscamper |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 15, 12:08*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 14, 5:29*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 7:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 14, 9:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 12:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Take a look at the image on the right he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnu...f_the_universe Now, I know you are going to say there is another Universal jet in the image. However, I am pointing out that we have no evidence it exists. We also have no evidence there is a Universal black hole with two polar jets. What we have evidence of is the Universal jet we exist in. I'm not saying there is, or isn't an opposite Universal jet, just that we have no evidence of it. But we can honestly surmise that it most likely does exist, and because it's going directly away from us at 'c' is why it or any of its aether jet flow will never be detected, not to mention the extreme distance of its molecular universe being hundreds of billions or even conceivably trillions of light years away from us by now. For all we know with any objective certainty is that a quantum singularity particle seems to exist at the time a given wave is detected, but there's still nothing objectively proving that each individual wave and its associated particle are one and the very same as provided by the original source wave and its associated particle, just like the electron entering one end of any given wire is simply not the same electron that emerges out or is taken from the other end of that copper conductor. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? The C-60 molecule fired at the slits in a double slit experiment is the same C-60 molecule detected after interacting with the slits. The C-60 molecule travels a well defined path and the associated wave in the aether passes through all of the slits. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? Do you understand in a double slit experiment, the proton, neutron, atom or molecule moves? Are you able to understand the proton, neutron, atom or molecule travels a well defined path which takes it through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both? At least I'm able to ask an honest question that you can't seem to answer. Do you understand in a double slit experiment, the proton, neutron, atom or molecule moves? Are you able to understand the proton, neutron, atom or molecule travels a well defined path which takes it through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both? |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/15/2012 12:07 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? I think of Cern and Cern is your answer (faster TreBet No, that's pure hogwash. Electrons moving in a conductor is entirely than Cern, I really have NO idea what the two of you are talking about, but electricity moves through a super conductor with little or no resistance. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 15, 4:29*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Nov 15, 12:08*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 14, 5:29*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 7:34*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Nov 14, 9:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 14, 12:03*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Take a look at the image on the right he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnu...f_the_universe Now, I know you are going to say there is another Universal jet in the image. However, I am pointing out that we have no evidence it exists.. We also have no evidence there is a Universal black hole with two polar jets. What we have evidence of is the Universal jet we exist in. I'm not saying there is, or isn't an opposite Universal jet, just that we have no evidence of it. But we can honestly surmise that it most likely does exist, and because it's going directly away from us at 'c' is why it or any of its aether jet flow will never be detected, not to mention the extreme distance of its molecular universe being hundreds of billions or even conceivably trillions of light years away from us by now. For all we know with any objective certainty is that a quantum singularity particle seems to exist at the time a given wave is detected, but there's still nothing objectively proving that each individual wave and its associated particle are one and the very same as provided by the original source wave and its associated particle, just like the electron entering one end of any given wire is simply not the same electron that emerges out or is taken from the other end of that copper conductor. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? The C-60 molecule fired at the slits in a double slit experiment is the same C-60 molecule detected after interacting with the slits. The C-60 molecule travels a well defined path and the associated wave in the aether passes through all of the slits. Do super-conductors allow their electrons to travel, migrate or propagate any faster, or slower? Do you understand in a double slit experiment, the proton, neutron, atom or molecule moves? Are you able to understand the proton, neutron, atom or molecule travels a well defined path which takes it through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both? At least I'm able to ask an honest question that you can't seem to answer. Do you understand in a double slit experiment, the proton, neutron, atom or molecule moves? Are you able to understand the proton, neutron, atom or molecule travels a well defined path which takes it through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both? Your photon particle merely seems to exist, as though quantum entangled as part of the wave which materialized at any given point of its detection, but hasn't necessarily moved outside of its 2D wavelength. An electron which has measurable mass has been tracked as zooming at 2 cm/sec, thus having been objectively verified that a conductor of copper is allowing such electrons to actually move along its solid path, along with those electromagnetic waves propagating much faster. However, there is still no objective proof that the original electromagnetic wave is the exact same wave as the one detected at the other end of the copper wire. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1161 | March 11th 13 07:37 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 9th 12 08:43 PM |
Aether has mass | Painius[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 9th 12 04:30 PM |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |