|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
History Channel: Apollo: The Race Against Time
Dear gutless (no archive) "rk",
Good Christ Almighty; yet another terrific notion of getting something/anything of any sorts situated upon the moon. However lo and behold, at least Allan Cole and a few others know for a matter of fact that we still can't seem to get squat deployed upon the moon unless it's been engineered as capable of surviving a rather nasty impact as having been planned upon more than a decade ago by the LUNAR-A mission that's still on hold. Speaking about NASA/Apollo (our ultimate intellectual space-toilet of infomercials and disinformation-R-us crapolla), and of their continuing utter lack of having an independent shred worth of hard-science or that of any other believable evidence that's about as MOS infomercialism as it gets. "AMIE obtained this image from an altitude of about 2000 kilometres. It covers an area of about 100 kilometres and shows the region around Hadley Rille centred at approximately 25=B0 North and 3=B0 East." http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/SMART-1/SEMB7A808BE_0.html "The rille begins at the curved gash on the left side of this image, and is seen clearest in the rectangular, mare-floored valley in the centre of the image. It is over 120 kilometres long, and up to 1500 metres across and over 300 metres deep in places." "The camera itself has a medium field of view of 5.3 degrees by 5.3 degrees and provides a high-resolution image at 27 metres per pixel from an altitude of 300 kilometres. The image measures 1024 x 1024 pixels. Data from the micro-imager are read and stored in the AMIE electronics, where they can be downloaded as required from the spacecraft." Unfortunately, as for such having been obtained from 2000 km isn't worth diddly squat compared to the 100 km advantage of the Apollo CM orbit and further boosted by way of using their 10X telephoto lens for a full frame magnification of roughly 38,400:1 as compared to imaging the same from Earth using their 1:1 lens. The SMART-1/AMIE camera absolutely somewhat sucks at 180 m/pixel as compared to Kodak film and quality optics as utilized from the distance of 100 km, having been recorded upon essentially high resolution B&W (8192 x 8192 or 164 lpmm) format of film that I believe is worth something better than 1.8 m/pixel, and worth 256 bits per pixel at that. Still there's no sign of anything Apollo, unless somewhat recent impact craters are all that's showing us the truth. Thus even if SMART-1 were to cruise to within 300 km and obtain it's somewhat bit-limited worth of 27 m/pixel isn't going to become worth even a tenth as good of what's already on file, and even that's of what's 35+ years old at that. Too bad we can't manage to orbit something of a 100X optical that's getting onto a 2.2 micron/pixel CCD populated chip of 10x10 mm, and of accomplishing this robotic task at just 10 km off the deck, obviously better than having to make due with the Mars Express imaging resolution as having been obtained from 260+km that's actually limited to 7 micron pixels that's clearly out dated by the latest CCD and a 200X lens or mirror standard that should be able to beat that resolution at perhaps obtaining something less than 150 mm of at least 16 bits/pixel, although flying 10 km off the deck makes that worth 15 mm/pixel. http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/obj...34826&fbodylo= ngid=3D1597 Without applied PhotoShop "correspond to 2.3 metre square pixels on-ground for a spacecraft altitude of 250 km." As is, their 2.4 km x 2.4 km per frame as obtained from 250 km would become 0.96 x 0.96 km per frame if utilized at 100 km off the lunar surface, that's a raw 938 mm/pixel if there were no improvements in lens or CCD applied. Since we're only going for the moon, the 972 mm Matsukov-Cassegrain telescope could be replaced with a 2000 mm and the CCD replaced with the 2.2 micron/pixel, thus another 6.547 fold improvement would get that resolution as obtained from 100 km down to 143.3 mm/pixel, then a good application of PhotoShop shouldn't have any problem with creating a believable 16 mm/pixel. Cut the orbit down to 10 km off the deck and I believer we're into reading serial numbers off those supposed lander remains, those items of our grand old cloak and dagger cold-war days of disinformation-R-us and of spookology of utilizing all sorts of smoke and mirrors on steroids, of which as far as I can tell still isn't over until the fat lady sings. Of course somewhat harsh spectrum cut-off and/or band-pass filtering could be utilized, just in case the camera caught a look-see above the horizon, thus the horrifically bright (near-blue & near-UV) worth of the Sirius star system and otherwise nearly blindingly bright likes of Venus could be diminished and/or later PhotoShop removed so that there'd still be none of those stinking stars or that of a nearby Venus by which anyone could actually figure out if the moon imaging was real or not. We also wouldn't want to ever get a look-see at having Earth above the fully solar illuminated but otherwise extremely dark lunar surface that's showing us a somewhat reddish tint of a nearly coal dark golden lunar hew instead of the composite of cornmeal and portland cement and/or of a somewhat pumice like spectrum worth of gray tones as to what the Apollo/EVA obtained images recorded (whatever you do, don't look at anything of "moonpans" near white-out zones of lunar terrain). ~ Nondisclosu in spite of an orchestrated status quo, seems there's been other life upon Venus http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as interactive within the ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm Of Sirius, proto-moons, Venus & Earthly ETs & of somewhat testy topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS=20 http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 238 | June 12th 05 01:29 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | History | 0 | February 4th 05 11:06 PM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | August 1st 04 09:08 PM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |