|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
My father (Henry Cate) and I have come up with an initial tether project
that might be fun, affordable, and profitable. The idea is to use a rotating tether to pickup some Lunar samples, bring them back to Earth, and sell them. The Apollo Lunar Orbit Rendezvous was a big win because they did not need to land their return vehicle or fuel on the moon, just the lander. With a rotating tether we could win even more by only having a small scoop at the end of the tether touch the moon. Since there is no landing vehicle, we can also use a high ISP ion drive the whole time. By lifting a small scoop of regolith (probably under 10 Kg, maybe under 1 Kg) many times we could lift a reasonable total mass of lunar regolith using a small tether. For the 1.6 km/sec tip speed of a tether for lunar pickup, the tether only needs to be like 3 to 10 times the payload mass. The ion drive has to replace the momentum before the next pickup. The Dnepr at $10 to $13 mil for 9920 lbs (4500 Kg) to LEO seems like a good deal. http://www.spaceandtech.com/spacedat...nepr_sum.shtml Starting with a 4500 Kg vehicle in LEO we use an ion-drive to go to the moon, spin up a tether (probably winching in and out 2 tethers), and start picking up samples when the end of the rotating tether touches the moon. After picking up enough that it is running low on fuel, it could head back to earth and have a capsule reenter with the samples. The question of how many Kg of lunar sample you could bring back depends on a lot of things, like ISP of thruster, watts/Kg for solar, ratio of capsule mass to payload mass, how long the mission can be, etc. To really get a detailed answer would take some real work. You can also trade off time and mass returned to some extent (higher ISP can bring back more but takes longer). Our initial guesstimate is that you could return between 1,000 Kg and 10,000 Kg in something like 1.5 to 4 years. All of the Apollo missions combined returned 381.7 Kg. The Apollo costs have been estimated at $100 billion in 1994 dollars (next URL). If this project can be done for $50 million (not by NASA for sure) then this would be like 2000 times cheaper and return 2.5 to 25 times as much. :-) http://www.asi.org/adb/m/02/07/apollo-cost.html In a more fair comparison, the Artemis people were going to start with 44,000 lbs in LEO (so 4.4 times as much as us). They would return between 200 lbs (95 Kg) and (227 Kg) of lunar material (we return ~4 to ~100 times as much). http://www.asi.org/adb/04/03/10/05/returned-mass.html If you think of the investment cost as scaling with the lbs to LEO (a reasonable first approximation) and the financial return value as the Kg of Lunar material returned (not totally fair as the price goes down with a bigger supply), then the tether method is 16 to 400 times better. Artemis was sort of marginal as an investment, but this could be a reasonable investment. It is of course hard to estimate what people would pay for lunar regolith once there was a real supply. If it was $1,000/gram and you had 2,000 Kg, that would be $2 bil. Probably be hard to get that much, but it could really be a good return on investment. Additional missions would cost much less than the first, since you would not have the development costs again. You could even design the vehicle to be resupplied for a new mission (more xenon, new reentry capsule, etc). This would be able to pick up samples from many parts of the Moon, any part that passed under the orbit. If it was in a polar orbit it would even be possible to get a sample from a dark crater at the North or South pole to see if there was water ice. Most of the regolith is very fine dust. You might get more money selling lunar rocks. It might be possible to have a computer guided harpoon on the end that could target small rocks. Another interesting option is to use the tether to toss small reentry capsules from the Moon in such a way that they fall back to Earth. One nice thing about this is that you could start selling your product much sooner. The other nice thing is that and if at some point their was a catastrophic failure you would at least have what had been returned so far. People bidding on what you had so far would not know how much more would be coming. So concern that your vehicle might fail at any time might keep the price of Lunar material high longer. We have not seen this idea of using a rotating tether to pick up lunar samples anyplace else and think it looks very promising. What do you think? -- Vince |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
Vincent,
Nice idea, but not original. Hoyt, Forward and Moravec have each proposed using tethers for lunar landing and sample return some years ago. It can be done even more cheaply than you propose. You do not even need any ion drive or propulsion at all actually. You can do it entirely with zero momentum exchange, you simply deposit payloads on to the lunar surface whose mass equals that of the samples you remove. For the details, take a look at these web links: http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers3.html http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers.html Best regards, Charles F. Radley AFAIAA (Vincent Cate) wrote in message . com... My father (Henry Cate) and I have come up with an initial tether project that might be fun, affordable, and profitable. The idea is to use a rotating tether to pickup some Lunar samples, bring them back to Earth, and sell them. [snip] We have not seen this idea of using a rotating tether to pick up lunar samples anyplace else and think it looks very promising. What do you think? -- Vince |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
Vincent,
Nice idea, but not original. Hoyt, Forward and Moravec have each proposed using tethers for lunar landing and sample return some years ago. It can be done even more cheaply than you propose. You do not even need any ion drive or propulsion at all actually. You can do it entirely with zero momentum exchange, you simply deposit payloads on to the lunar surface whose mass equals that of the samples you remove. For the details, take a look at these web links: http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers3.html http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers.html Best regards, Charles F. Radley AFAIAA (Vincent Cate) wrote in message . com... My father (Henry Cate) and I have come up with an initial tether project that might be fun, affordable, and profitable. The idea is to use a rotating tether to pickup some Lunar samples, bring them back to Earth, and sell them. [snip] We have not seen this idea of using a rotating tether to pick up lunar samples anyplace else and think it looks very promising. What do you think? -- Vince |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
In article ,
Vincent Cate wrote: We have not seen this idea of using a rotating tether to pick up lunar samples anyplace else... I *think* I have seen rotating tethers for orbital samplers mentioned before, but I'm unable to locate a specific reference. ...and think it looks very promising. There are some obvious issues with precision navigation over an uneven surface, but they don't seem insuperable. It certainly does have potential. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
In article ,
Vincent Cate wrote: We have not seen this idea of using a rotating tether to pick up lunar samples anyplace else... I *think* I have seen rotating tethers for orbital samplers mentioned before, but I'm unable to locate a specific reference. ...and think it looks very promising. There are some obvious issues with precision navigation over an uneven surface, but they don't seem insuperable. It certainly does have potential. -- MOST launched 30 June; first light, 29 July; 5arcsec | Henry Spencer pointing, 10 Sept; first science, early Oct; all well. | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
Charles F. Radley wrote:
Vincent, Nice idea, but not original. Hoyt, Forward and Moravec have each proposed using tethers for lunar landing and sample return some years ago. It can be done even more cheaply than you propose. You do not even need any ion drive or propulsion at all actually. You can do it entirely with zero momentum exchange, you simply deposit payloads on to the lunar surface whose mass equals that of the samples you remove. Assuming a spherical moon. For non-spherical, non-ideal gravity moons, things get more interesting. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
Charles F. Radley wrote:
Vincent, Nice idea, but not original. Hoyt, Forward and Moravec have each proposed using tethers for lunar landing and sample return some years ago. It can be done even more cheaply than you propose. You do not even need any ion drive or propulsion at all actually. You can do it entirely with zero momentum exchange, you simply deposit payloads on to the lunar surface whose mass equals that of the samples you remove. Assuming a spherical moon. For non-spherical, non-ideal gravity moons, things get more interesting. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
(Charles F. Radley) wrote in message
. com... Nice idea, but not original. Hoyt, Forward and Moravec have each proposed using tethers for lunar landing and sample return some years ago. I realize that they proposed tethers for the Moon; however, I have not seen them point out that you could pick up samples without any infrastructure in place on the Moon. The thing that might be original is that a single probe, with no advance landing on the moon, could use a tether to scoop up samples. It can be done even more cheaply than you propose. You do not even need any ion drive or propulsion at all actually. You can do it entirely with zero momentum exchange, you simply deposit payloads on to the lunar surface whose mass equals that of the samples you remove. If we use an ion drive of 10,000 seconds ISP, it is throwing xenon out the back at about 98 km/sec. To pick up something from the Moon we need to give it 1.6 km/sec of momentum. So with the momentum from 1 Kg of xenon we can pick up 98 kps / 1.6 kps or about 61 Kg of regolith. If you simply deposited equal mass on the lunar surface you would only pick up 1 Kg for every 1 Kg you put down. So this way is cheaper for a probe on a sample return type mission. For the details, take a look at these web links: http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers3.html http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers.html When I say "lunar sample return" I mean that there is nothing already in place on the Moon. I have not seen anything in these or any others papers I have read that indicates they were thinking of a sample return type mission. Sure people have looked at Lunar tethers. And I do think that two way lunar tether traffic would be *really cool*. In particular once we have lots of tourists going to the moon and coming back. -- Vince |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lunar Sample Return via Tether
(Vincent Cate) wrote in message . com...
(Charles F. Radley) wrote in message . com... Nice idea, but not original. Hoyt, Forward and Moravec have each proposed using tethers for lunar landing and sample return some years ago. I realize that they proposed tethers for the Moon; however, I have not seen them point out that you could pick up samples without any infrastructure in place on the Moon. The thing that might be original is that a single probe, with no advance landing on the moon, could use a tether to scoop up samples. The Hoyt/Forward proposals do not need infrastructure on the Moon. A bit of infrastructure might be nice to collect the specimens ahead of time and make them ready for pick-up, but that is not essential. If we use an ion drive of 10,000 seconds ISP, it is throwing xenon out the back at about 98 km/sec. To pick up something from the Moon we need to give it 1.6 km/sec of momentum. So with the momentum from 1 Kg of xenon we can pick up 98 kps / 1.6 kps or about 61 Kg of regolith. If you simply deposited equal mass on the lunar surface you would only pick up 1 Kg for every 1 Kg you put down. So this way is cheaper for a probe on a sample return type mission. OK. Whether that is better than zero momentum exchange depends on whether you are interested in putting payloads on the lunar surface. Since soft landing on the Moon using rockets is extremely expensive, the tether method of depositing payloads is much cheaper. It would open up new markets for lunar development. Adding an ion drive has the advantage of lowering the amount of mass which must be launched from Earth, but it loses the opportunity benefit of soft-landing lots of payloads on to the Moon. For the details, take a look at these web links: http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers3.html http://www.tethers.com/MXTethers.html When I say "lunar sample return" I mean that there is nothing already in place on the Moon. I have not seen anything in these or any others papers I have read that indicates they were thinking of a sample return type mission. Sure people have looked at Lunar True, their paradigm is rather the inverse, soft landing high-value payloads on to the Moon. They did not recognize collecting lunar samples as a significant market. You have taken the precise opposite viewpoint, going for the lunar samples, and ignoring the oppportunity to soft-land payloads. Perhaps reality will be somewhere in between. tethers. And I do think that two way lunar tether traffic would be *really cool*. In particular once we have lots of tourists going to the moon and coming back. In the short term we can soft land lots of infrastructure on to the Moon basically for free (except for the cost of launch from Earth), and build hotels ready for the tourists when they come. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lunar base and space manufacturing books for sale | Martin Bayer | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
Project Constellation Questions | Space Cadet | Space Shuttle | 128 | March 21st 04 01:17 AM |
Mars Sample Return - The Real Space Race | Alain Fournier | Space Science Misc | 4 | November 20th 03 05:56 AM |
ESA's First Step Towards Mars Sample Return | Ron Baalke | Science | 1 | November 17th 03 11:30 AM |
Arecibo Radar Shows No Evidence of Thick Ice At Lunar Poles | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 12th 03 06:02 PM |