A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Massive Galaxies Born Earlier Than Expected



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 27th 09, 03:40 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default Massive Galaxies Born Earlier Than Expected

Yet another discovery about galaxies that our models (i.e. our
preconceived ideas) weren't prepared for. They are saying that the
biggest galaxies anchoring galaxy clusters should've formed slowly over
billions of years into their current sizes, but according to this
finding, they were already as massive as they were going to get when the
Universe was just 1/3 as old as it is now.

This one is the second preconceived galactic idea in a week to run into
trouble from actual observation. The earlier preconceived idea to come
crashing down was that Lyman-alpha blob galaxies couldn't possibly have
been formed as long ago as 12.9 billions years ago.

Yousuf Khan

Massive Galaxies Born Earlier Than Expected
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Ma...ted_999.ht ml

Astronomers have discovered large galaxies that have not changed much in size for the last 9 billion years - a finding that conflicts with widely-held views of when and how galaxies form.

The conventional model for galaxy formation is a bottom-up or hierarchical model in which small galaxies gradually develop into larger ones over a long period of time. The model predicts that smaller galaxies would merge to form larger ones, growing to 90% of their size about 11 billion years after the Big Bang. This means that smaller galaxies would be older and larger ones, younger.

A team of astrophysicists, led by Professor Chris Collins from Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), used observations from the Subaru Telescope (one of the world's largest optical-infrared telescopes) as well as the XMM-Newton (an x-ray observatory in space) to collect data about galaxies that existed two-thirds of the way back in time since the Universe began.

By being able to extend the baseline of their data so far back in time, they have a foundation for concluding that large galaxies were almost fully formed 4-5 billion years after the Big Bang, 6-7 billion years earlier than the hierarchical model would forecast.

Dr. John Stott, who carried out the photometry and data analysis, stressed the significance of the research: "We were surprised to find that the largest and brightest galaxies in the universe have remained essentially unchanged for the last 9 billion years, having grown rapidly soon after the Big Bang."

Candles for Studying the Universe
The galaxies examined in the observations were brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), located at the centers of galaxy clusters. Because they are so bright and uniform, they are often used as beacons for studying the universe.

At the beginning of their research, the scientists examined the ages of the stars in the galaxies. Their findings indicated a consistent epoch of formation for the majority of the stars - about 2-3 billion years after the Big Bang. Since the galaxies they studied were almost fully formed 4-5 billion years after the Big Bang, they concluded that they probably grew rapidly and formed much sooner than the hierarchical model of galaxy evolution
suggests.

Questions May Enrich or Change Models for Galaxy Formation
These findings add fuel to the longstanding debate about when galaxies form. Although there is evidence that some merging of galaxies is occurring, as the hierarchical model predicts, it does not seem to be the explanation for the earlier birth of large galaxies that this research discovered.

The breakthrough findings of the LJMU astronomers' research may alter the way that simulation models are constructed in the future.

Simulation models provide a useful framework to compare theory with data. In light of these findings, future simulation models may need to take into account the rapid growth of some galaxies.

Professor Chris Collins commented, "Current predictions using simulations run on supercomputers suggest that at such a young age these galaxies should be only 20% of their final weight, so to find galaxies so large suggests that galaxy formation is a much more rapid process than we previously thought and perhaps the theories are missing some important physics."

The surprising findings of this research also give scientists new questions to think about: How do these large, Bright Cluster Galaxies form sooner than expected after the Big Bang? And, how have the BCGs remained almost unchanged in size and weight for 9 billion years?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Massive Galaxies Born Earlier Than Expected Yousuf Khan Astronomy Misc 8 April 30th 09 12:15 AM
Galaxies are born inside dark matter clumps (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 0 May 12th 06 05:40 PM
Galaxies are born inside dark matter clumps (Forwarded) Andrew Yee News 0 May 12th 06 04:20 PM
Big Baby Galaxies in new born Universe Ray Vingnutte Misc 0 September 28th 05 02:51 AM
Old Galaxies in the Young Universe: VLT Unravels New Population of Very Old Massive Galaxies (Forwarded) greywolf42 Astronomy Misc 6 August 11th 04 05:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.