A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] Start of the ''MBFITS" Public Comment Period



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 21st 07, 03:17 PM posted to sci.astro.fits
LC's NoSpam Newsreading account[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default [fitsbits] Start of the ''MBFITS" Public Comment Period

I had a quick glance to the the summary and full specification pdf docs
(quicker for the second).

My impressions are :

- the summary is too much a summary for the registry
- the full specification instead is too detailed for the registry
(however could be provided as supplementary document)

I had no time to comment on the Hierarchical Grouping convention lately
during the public comment period, but I've just commented to the IAU FWG
that it looked intimidating ... and MBFITS is a special case of
application of the Hierarchical Grouping ...

The figure at pag. 3 of the summary (or pag. 6 of the spec) looks rather
nice (I was commenting on Hierarchical Grouping on the lack of such
graphical schemes) ... but leaves me confused because I have not
clear the order of the various extensions (or perhaps there is no order
because they are not in a single file).

Also I have doubts whether a mission-specific convention like this is
suitable for inclusion in the registry. Or perhaps this could be
rephrased saying that the registry shall be split in two parts :

- one to document general purpose conventions
- one to document mission specific conventions (specially for major
missions, and this surely fits in this category)

My idea about the registry was that it should document things like :

- a limited set of keywords allowing to identify the file as following
a specific convention
- all other rules by which a general purpose reader could deal with
a file identified as following such convention

In this case from the first glance (could be too quick so I could be
wrong), it looks to me that MBFITS has no specific "signature" keywords
other than those of Hierarchical Grouping, while it has (lots of)
mission-specific keywords, and anyhow assumes mission-specific software
instead of a generic reader (or maybe I'm simply not expert at all in
radioastronomy, AIPS and alike, and it just requires any radio-aware
reader).

Lucio Chiappetti (IAUFWG member)

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is a newsreading account used by more persons to
avoid unwanted spam. Any mail returning to this address will be rejected.
Users can disclose their e-mail address in the article if they wish so.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[fitsbits] Start of the ''MBFITS" Public Comment Period William Pence FITS 0 May 3rd 07 07:34 PM
[fitsbits] Start of "Tiled Image Compression" Public Comment Period William Pence FITS 0 November 15th 06 06:08 PM
[fitsbits] Start of "column limits" public comment period Robert Hanisch FITS 0 July 14th 06 06:56 PM
[fitsbits] Start of "column limits" public comment period William Pence FITS 0 July 14th 06 06:43 PM
[fitsbits] Start of the HEALPix "Public Comment Period" William Pence FITS 0 November 15th 05 09:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.