|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
Question: What would be the approximate mass and velocity of a "rock" entering the atmosphe a) in order for it to strike the earth at a terminal velocity of approximately 55 m/s, b) weighing about 45 kilograms? I am assuming, 1, that the 'rock' (asteroid) would hit the atmosphere, become a meteor and burn, 2, that the remnant of the meteor would slow, 3, that the remaining 'stone' (meteorite) would fall at terminal velocity, 4, and hit the earth at about 45 kg. Is there some kind of "average range" for mass and velocity that might produce the specified result? thanks.... owd |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
On Feb 24, 2:56 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article . com, wrote: ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS Question: What would be the approximate mass and velocity of a "rock" entering the atmosphe a) in order for it to strike the earth at a terminal velocity of approximately 55 m/s, b) weighing about 45 kilograms? I am assuming, 1, that the 'rock' (asteroid) would hit the atmosphere, become a meteor and burn, 2, that the remnant of the meteor would slow, 3, that the remaining 'stone' (meteorite) would fall at terminal velocity, 4, and hit the earth at about 45 kg. Is there some kind of "average range" for mass and velocity that might produce the specified result? thanks.... owd So science is all wrong yada yada, yet you can't work out some simple kinematics and need to ask those pesky scientists with their Babylon science BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA Hit the earth at 45kg BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA Boy (assumption) playing with you is just SO much fun... Clue one for the clueless: There is a difference between the "technique" (or the craft,) and the Philosophy behind the "craft." Clue two Technique makes great toys and gizmos, but THAT does not prove the Philosophy called "science" Clue three for the lost There is no problem with the practical application of intellect and knowledge, any "Problem" is in the illogic and sophistry behind the methodology. Having confessed that you cannot comprehend the separation of the "Philosophy of science" from the "methodology in practice" you may now go back to sleep. Yes, the Philosophy of science is delusion and sophistry. However, the methods and technology work fine to make nice toys. Having cleared that lack of understanding, what would be the mass and velocity range you would estimate? Thanks owd |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
On Feb 24, 3:36 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article .com, wrote: Boy (assumption) playing with you is just SO much fun... Well, you seem easily pleased - I love the arrogance that comes with you biblical apocalyptical types. Sole track to knowledge and all that. Clue one for the clueless: There is a difference between the "technique" (or the craft,) and the Philosophy behind the "craft." Clue two Technique makes great toys and gizmos, but THAT does not prove the Philosophy called "science" You truly don't understand science do you.? Perhaps you should go live in the woods some more. Clue three for the lost There is no problem with the practical application of intellect and knowledge, any "Problem" is in the illogic and sophistry behind the methodology. Yep - more ******** from the loon. You are just another loon who thinks that because relativity and QM yield results you don't understand - that that means they are wrong. Ignorant AND arrogant. Having confessed that you cannot comprehend the separation of the "Philosophy of science" from the "methodology in practice" you may now go back to sleep. Yes, the Philosophy of science is delusion and sophistry. Nonsense. Particularly poignant that someone so ignorant of modern science should try and seek the higher ground by claiming sophistry. How much real science have you done, loon? However, the methods and technology work fine to make nice toys. Having cleared that lack of understanding, what would be the mass and velocity range you would estimate? Learn some simple maths and classical mechanics and work it out yourself. Teach yourself to fish before begging ... I have no intention to help you troll any more. I'm just waiting for you to get into full flow as I can sense several kook awards in your near future. Oh, there is more than math to this question: For example, what is the density of the usual space "Rock"? What is the composition? Basalt, Granite? Other? Compostition, density, mass, temperature, velocity -- hummmmm..... How much material will melt away while the "stone" is slowed to terminal velicity by atmospheric drag? However, Since you have been so helpful, The next part of the problem for your erudite consideration: There is not one object (asteroid) or "stone" -- there are thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions. This mass of asteroids is moving toward the Sun in a long cloud, so that the earth will pass through the cloud, and meteorites (stones) will fall on the earth for about 24 hours. What may be the possible configuration of such a cloud of asteroids? It may be 25 to 50 thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of miles long, It may be 25 to 50 thousands of miles in diameter. What would be the density of the cloud, so that thousands or hundreds of thousands of meteorites (stones) fall on all of the earth? Since such a cloud is approaching the earth, when will astronomers detect it? How long, before it begins to strike the earth, will Astronomers be able to see it? If such a cloud were moving directly toward the Sun, such that its length were aligned toward and away from the sun, so that the earth would pass through its diameter in 24 hours, how wide would that cloud be? Once we get some range of possible answers to these questions, we will continue to effects. oh, and thanks for your kind assistence... ;-) owd |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
On Feb 24, 4:43 pm, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article om, wrote: Oh, there is more than math to this question: For example, what is the density of the usual space "Rock"? What is the composition? Basalt, Granite? Other? Use a first approximation - model as an earth rock Compostition, density, mass, temperature, velocity -- hummmmm..... How much material will melt away while the "stone" is slowed to terminal velicity by atmospheric drag? However, Since you have been so helpful, The next part of the problem for your erudite consideration: There is not one object (asteroid) or "stone" -- there are thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions. This mass of asteroids is moving toward the Sun in a long cloud, so that the earth will pass through the cloud, and meteorites (stones) will fall on the earth for about 24 hours. What may be the possible configuration of such a cloud of asteroids? It may be 25 to 50 thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of miles long, It may be 25 to 50 thousands of miles in diameter. What would be the density of the cloud, so that thousands or hundreds of thousands of meteorites (stones) fall on all of the earth? Since such a cloud is approaching the earth, when will astronomers detect it? How long, before it begins to strike the earth, will Astronomers be able to see it? If such a cloud were moving directly toward the Sun, such that its length were aligned toward and away from the sun, so that the earth would pass through its diameter in 24 hours, how wide would that cloud be? Once we get some range of possible answers to these questions, we will continue to effects. oh, and thanks for your kind assistence... ;-) Why not just enrol in a basic Astronomy course. That way, you don't troll here with your nonsense. It is not nonsense -- even if you don't like the idea... Think about it. There is a lot of agitation about the posibility of a large asteroid striking the earth. (see the recent post, in this group)-(see the news) (****, do google, I do.) But that is just sensationalism. (What is that? how to get a grant?) (Or maybe that's "publish or perish?) There is no discussion - that I can find - of small bodies impacting earth. What? you don't think it's possible? Or you just don't want to thnk about it? Why can't you comprehend the possiblilty of Sol System passing through the remnant of some intergalatic gravel bed? What, there are no bodies able to throw a large number of small bodies out of Sol's Ort Cloud? I took a basic astonomy class. "Basic" astronomy does not cover the questions I have. I've done some reading; but I'm an artist and writer, math does not compute. So I can find out the wiight (mass) of a substance. Basalt. Fine. What is the weight to volume? How large is a 45 - 46 kg lump of Basalt. What is the melting temperature of Basalt? If an asteroid of basalt impacts the earth's atmosphere at 9 Km/s - what size must that body be to impact the earth at terminal velocity (say, 55 m/s) with 45kg mass remaining? You get "atmospheric breaking" in a "basic astronomy" Class? Well, Puddles, it has been entertaining and instructive discussing asteroid impact dynamics with you... ;-) enjoy..... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
On Feb 25, 5:01 am, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article .com, wrote: It is not nonsense -- even if you don't like the idea... Think about it. There is a lot of agitation about the posibility of a large asteroid striking the earth. (see the recent post, in this group)-(see the news) (****, do google, I do.) But that is just sensationalism. (What is that? how to get a grant?) (Or maybe that's "publish or perish?) There is no discussion - that I can find - of small bodies impacting earth. Basic astronomy course would help. It has helped, I can read "Astronomy" and "Sky & telescope" without getting dizzy. What? you don't think it's possible? Or you just don't want to thnk about it? Why can't you comprehend the possiblilty of Sol System passing through the remnant of some intergalatic gravel bed? What, there are no bodies able to throw a large number of small bodies out of Sol's Ort Cloud? Intergalactic? Oh man, you've been smoking some good ****. I guess you meant Interstellar. I didn't say "intrAgalatic" I said intERgalatic.... "Between the stars" Puddles, MEANS "inside the galaxy." Boy, buy yr books, send ya ta school, and ys STILL can't think! Besides, are you going to tell me that "dark bodies" or a cloud of Extra-Galatic Astroids do NOT exist? LOL! Sure.... and your next card trick is.... But even then, the odds are...... fill in the blanks. Oh? let me see... You LIKE the odds on Big Bang at umpteem zillions to Zero, and you LIKE the odds on spontaenous generation of life in pond scum at multiples of zillions to none, but you don't like the odds on asteroid impacts? LOL! WELL, Scuzzzz me! I took a basic astonomy class. "Basic" astronomy does not cover the questions I have. Then take more. I'm too old and set in my ways. I've done some reading; but I'm an artist and writer, math does not compute. Then learn. Do you take your own advice? Then lean to think, rather than close your mind to ideas you don't like. So I can find out the wiight (mass) of a substance. Basalt. Fine. What is the weight to volume? How large is a 45 - 46 kg lump of Basalt. What is the melting temperature of Basalt? I google every day, sometimes twice. If an asteroid of basalt impacts the earth's atmosphere at 9 Km/s - what size must that body be to impact the earth at terminal velocity (say, 55 m/s) with 45kg mass remaining? You get "atmospheric breaking" in a "basic astronomy" Class? Some astronomy classes include orbital mechanics. And some don't. One tool is worthless with out the nuts and bolts. Well, Puddles, it has been entertaining and instructive discussing asteroid impact dynamics with you... ;-) You're still a loon. You're still a closed minded bufoon, but at least you don't use dirty words, chew tobaccy and spit. Now that we've got THAT detail out of the way....on to effects.... We were discussing the approach of a large cloud (or 'swarm') of small asteroid bodies, and the expected effects. There are, of course a nearly infinite number of directions. However, an approach near the plane of the ecliptic (or galactic plane) seems most reasonable. Four general directions seem likely: from behind, or following, the direction of the sun's galactic orbit, or from ahead. The approach may be from inside the central area of the galaxy, or from outside moving inward. If this cloud of asteroids approaches earth from the direction of the sun, falling bodies would strike the dayside of earth. An approach from the side away from sol would mean the falling bodies would strike the night side of earth. In either case, it seems likely that the approach of the asteroids should be visible as they strike the planets between the cloud and the sun, or between the cloud and the earth. That is, if the cloud enters the solar system on the same side of the sun as the earth, and crosses the orbits of the outer planets, the impacts of those bodies should be visible to astronomers. On the other hand, if the cloud enters the solar system on the side of the sun away from the earth, then impacts on the outer planets should still be visible to astronomers, and those that fall into the sun would be visible during the day as comets. In either case, depending on the velocity of the swarm of asteroids, the approach should be visible for some time, giving World Governments and People some time for preparation. Now listen, Puddles, I'm not asking anyone (you) to LIKE this idea, and I'm not asking anyone to AGREE to the idea, I'm asking you to CONSIDER the idea and THINK about it. So far your input has been scanty and of marginal value -- I hope you will take a little time to consider your response so you may add something of value rather than negative skepticism (positive skepticism would be an improvement). Any contribution would be greatly appreciated ;-) owd |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ASTEROID IMPACT: A QUESTION OF SIZE AND MASS
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: In article om, wrote: On Feb 25, 5:01 am, Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: In article .com, wrote: It is not nonsense -- even if you don't like the idea... Think about it. There is a lot of agitation about the posibility of a large asteroid striking the earth. (see the recent post, in this group)-(see the news) (****, do google, I do.) But that is just sensationalism. (What is that? how to get a grant?) (Or maybe that's "publish or perish?) There is no discussion - that I can find - of small bodies impacting earth. Basic astronomy course would help. It has helped, I can read "Astronomy" and "Sky & telescope" without getting dizzy. That doesn't mean you know basic astronomy. Celestial mechanics and some basic stellar physics would be a start What? you don't think it's possible? Or you just don't want to thnk about it? Why can't you comprehend the possiblilty of Sol System passing through the remnant of some intergalatic gravel bed? What, there are no bodies able to throw a large number of small bodies out of Sol's Ort Cloud? Intergalactic? Oh man, you've been smoking some good ****. I guess you meant Interstellar. I didn't say "intrAgalatic" I said intERgalatic.... "Between the stars" Puddles, MEANS "inside the galaxy." Then say interstellar which means between the stars (Dictionary.com) in?ter?stel?lar [in-ter-stel-er] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation *adjective Astronomy. situated or occurring between the stars: interstellar dust. in?ter?ga?lac?tic [in-ter-guh-lak-tik] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation *adjective of, existing, or occurring in the space between galaxies: The science-fiction movie was about an intergalactic war. The fact you don't know which word to use doesn't fill me with awe about your promise as a write I stand corrected: I was laboring under the wrong impression that "intersteller" and "inside the galaxy (intergalatic) was the same, and "IntrA-galatic" meant "between galaxies." I see I had it backwards.... thanks for your correction. Well, if that were the first glaring mistake I've ever made, I'd blush. Boy, buy yr books, send ya ta school, and ys STILL can't think! Besides, are you going to tell me that "dark bodies" or a cloud of Extra-Galatic Astroids do NOT exist? LOL! Sure.... and your next card trick is.... Asteroids are believed to be a byproduct of planetary system formation, so the likelihood of extra-galactic ones are small. Believed? "Likelihood"? is that likelyhood as in "the odds are..." IF, IF the theory "BELIEVED" is correct.... Pudddles, Puddles, if it is "believed" then it is NOT VERIFIABLE SCIENTIFIC FACT! IT IS A BELIEF!!! "BELIEF," PUDDLES, IS RELIGION! !!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!! !!!!!! But even then, the odds are...... fill in the blanks. Oh? let me see... You LIKE the odds on Big Bang at umpteem zillions to Zero, and you LIKE the odds on spontaenous generation of life in pond scum at multiples of zillions to none, but you don't like the odds on asteroid impacts? Did I say that? LOL! WELL, Scuzzzz me! I took a basic astonomy class. "Basic" astronomy does not cover the questions I have. Then take more. I'm too old and set in my ways. I can tell. I've done some reading; but I'm an artist and writer, math does not compute. Then learn. Do you take your own advice? Then lean to think, rather than close your mind to ideas you don't like. Projection. An art you don't practice, right? :-) So I can find out the wiight (mass) of a substance. Basalt. Fine. What is the weight to volume? How large is a 45 - 46 kg lump of Basalt. What is the melting temperature of Basalt? I google every day, sometimes twice. If an asteroid of basalt impacts the earth's atmosphere at 9 Km/s - what size must that body be to impact the earth at terminal velocity (say, 55 m/s) with 45kg mass remaining? You get "atmospheric breaking" in a "basic astronomy" Class? Some astronomy classes include orbital mechanics. And some don't. One tool is worthless with out the nuts and bolts. Then take a better class. If you think you're going to make deep insights with no math skills you're sadly mistaken.... What makes you think I want to "make deep insights"? Man (Boy) THAT is not on my schedule.... Well, Puddles, it has been entertaining and instructive discussing asteroid impact dynamics with you... ;-) You're still a loon. You're still a closed minded bufoon, but at least you don't use dirty words, chew tobaccy and spit. Ah - because I don't buy into your pseudo-religous mumbo jumbo I'm closed mindede BWAHAHA. Without the "pseudo-religious mumbo-jumpo" THINK ABOUT THE MECHANICS AND THE POSSIBILITY!! You are "closed minded" because you will not consider an idea that was not handed down to you from the heights of Mt Palomar! (or the chair of the astronomy Dept.) Tell me, Puddles, did any scientist EVER discover anything by refusing to consider a new thought? So you don't like the Idea! O.K., you have me convinced on that. BUT YOU HAVE OFFERED NO CRITICAL OBJECTION! All you have is -- "go take a class!" Do you have any FACTS, or SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIABLE DATA to prove the possibility is impossible? If you do, you certainly have not offered any. SO IF YOU CAN NOT DEMONSTRATE HOW IT MIGHT WORK, THEN DEMONSTRATE THAT IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE! (You can not.) Now that we've got THAT detail out of the way....on to effects.... We were discussing the approach of a large cloud (or 'swarm') of small asteroid bodies, and the expected effects. There are, of course a nearly infinite number of directions. However, an approach near the plane of the ecliptic (or galactic plane) seems most reasonable. Four general directions seem likely: from behind, or following, the direction of the sun's galactic orbit, or from ahead. The approach may be from inside the central area of the galaxy, or from outside moving inward. You are very confused. Asteroids are planetary system bodies, You are sufering from a closed mind. Someone TOLD you that "they believe" asteroids are the result of planetary formation -- AND YOU BELIEVED THAT and then closed your mind! so why should there be huge clouds of them in the galaxy not associated with stellar systems. Also if they are orbiting in the plane of the galaxy, at the same distance as the sun they would orbit at the same velocity = no threat. Ah! that is the crux of the matter, now isn't it? They are not "orbiting," they are "Falling" (relative to the earth's surface). They are IN MOTION "other than" orbit! If this cloud of asteroids approaches earth from the direction of the sun, falling bodies would strike the dayside of earth. An approach from the side away from sol would mean the falling bodies would strike the night side of earth. You should stop watching Armageddon You should try entertaining an independent thought, rather than parroting what you've been told to believe. In either case, it seems likely that the approach of the asteroids should be visible as they strike the planets between the cloud and the sun, or between the cloud and the earth. These mythical interstellar asteroids? If they are "mythical" then when one falls on you, it won't hurt a bit. That is, if the cloud enters the solar system on the same side of the sun as the earth, and crosses the orbits of the outer planets, the impacts of those bodies should be visible to astronomers. On the other hand, if the cloud enters the solar system on the side of the sun away from the earth, then impacts on the outer planets should still be visible to astronomers, and those that fall into the sun would be visible during the day as comets. So astronomers are "good" right now? I've never suggested otherwise... Astronomers are people, some wear pants and some wear skirts, and THAT does not make them either good or not-good. What has being able to see asteroids impact planets or fall into the sun have to do with being "good"? In either case, depending on the velocity of the swarm of asteroids, the approach should be visible for some time, giving World Governments and People some time for preparation. Now listen, Puddles, I'm not asking anyone (you) to LIKE this idea, and I'm not asking anyone to AGREE to the idea, I'm asking you to CONSIDER the idea and THINK about it. Its likelihood is around 10^{1001}. Is that about equal to life forming in pond scum? Fine: You don't like the idea, and you are NOT going to BELIEVE the Idea.... Now that we've settled THAT, how about you spend some little time explaining the math and orbital mechanics of small body impact on the earth? So far your input has been scanty and of marginal value -- I hope you will take a little time to consider your response so you may add something of value rather than negative skepticism (positive skepticism would be an improvement). I'm skecptical as you don't understand even basic stellar and planetary astronomy. That's fine: skepticalism is not objectionable. What is counter- productive is being skeptical and refusing to consider the details and possibilities of an idea. Being skeptical AND considering an idea - that is wise. Agreed: I have, at best, an amateur or beginners concept of stellar and planetary astronomy -- just enough to read "Sky and Telescope" and say, "Wow, I wish I had a 10 incher like THAT!" However, Puddles, THAT does not mean that I can NOT think, or imagine, or CONCEIVE! Any contribution would be greatly appreciated ;-) owd My suggestion is stop posting Why, are you done thinking? Hey, Look, Puddles; I didn't come on here attempting to tell you how to run your science or career OR what to believe. I posted my opinion, fine, if you don't lke that.... Oh, well.... You know what I believe, I know what you refuse to believe... fine. Now I've posted an idea and asked for input.... If you don't like it -- fine... if you don't want to believe it... fine. Still, if you can offer some constructive skepticism, or consider the idea as a 112 million to 1 impossibility, THEN explain the math and mechanics... you would be making a constructive contribution.... ---- 's been nice exchanging insults with ya... :-) enjoy owd |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Equivalent Asteroid size for generating Tsunami? | Tom Luton | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | December 30th 04 07:45 AM |
Asteroid impact now put at level 4 | Ray Vingnutte | Misc | 1 | December 28th 04 01:11 AM |
Want to simulate an asteroid impact? | Professor Fate | Astronomy Misc | 2 | April 10th 04 04:42 PM |
Neutrino Mass or No Mass That is the Question??? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 11 | February 19th 04 04:27 PM |
The size (and mass of stars) | J. Scott Miller | Misc | 5 | August 12th 03 07:08 PM |