One would think this would be a front page story

BradGuth wrote:

And, where exactly are those objective (meaning real human measured)
seasonal snow depths or specific location volumes as measurements from
year to year?

Hey, Guthie, with this link you may watch real-time (mostly) weather in Greenland.

It even has little call-outs with the temperatures so that you may watch everything
melt.

http://tinyurl.com/ykbjgy2

That warm weather is getting rather pesky.

http://www.thelocal.se/24200/20100104/

On Jan 9, 10:27*pm, "Nightcrawler" wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
And, where exactly are those objective (meaning real human measured)
seasonal snow depths or specific location volumes as measurements from
year to year?

Hey, Guthie, with this link you may watch real-time (mostly) weather in Greenland.

It even has little call-outs with the temperatures so that you may watch everything
melt.

http://tinyurl.com/ykbjgy2

And those conspicuously missing snow depth measurements at key
locations are hidden where?

~ BG

On 1/10/2010 12:56 PM, BradGuth wrote:

And those conspicuously missing snow depth measurements at key
locations are hidden where?

Has it ever occurred to you that there isn't any real time data
collection by humans on the ice shelf? The bore hole sights
measure the thickness of the ice, and the increase in ice depth
from the previous expedition. If you want real time numbers,
organize your own expedition and camp out for a winter.

On Jan 10, 12:26*pm, arare litus litus.arare@gmaildotcom wrote:
On 1/10/2010 12:56 PM, BradGuth wrote:

And those conspicuously missing snow depth measurements at key
locations are hidden where?

Has it ever occurred to you that there isn't any real time data
collection by humans on the ice shelf? *The bore hole sights
measure the thickness of the ice, and the increase in ice depth
from the previous expedition. *If you want real time numbers,
organize your own expedition and camp out for a winter.

True, that effort of taking seasonal snow accumulation depth
measurements at places already staffed by public funded individuals
would be a total waste of their precious time and resources. Who the
hell needs objective science that can be easily peer replicated
anyway?

~ BG

On 1/11/2010 2:13 PM, BradGuth wrote:

True, that effort of taking seasonal snow accumulation depth
measurements at places already staffed by public funded individuals
would be a total waste of their precious time and resources. Who the
hell needs objective science that can be easily peer replicated
anyway?

http://www.summitcamp.org/status/weather/reports


That's one. Not many to choose from, though. Like I said, go
there yourself and save the world some mumbo jumbo.