Launching of Publications Online

The Publications Online Board is proud to open its new Revue
"Publications Online" to the scientific community.
This journal is available to rapidly publish scientific papers, on the
basis of the scientific commons license. A new Collaborative reviewing
process is the main characteristic of
this revue.
More information is available on our website http://www.pub-online.org
Thanks a lot for your interest.

The Publications Online Board
http://pub-online.org

wrote:

The Publications Online Board is proud to open its new Revue
"Publications Online" to the scientific community.
This journal is available to rapidly publish scientific papers, on the
basis of the scientific commons license. A new Collaborative reviewing
process is the main characteristic of
this revue.
More information is available on our website http://www.pub-online.org
Thanks a lot for your interest.

The Publications Online Board
http://pub-online.org


Cool, Scientific Commons License sounds interesting.

--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @

Craig Fink wrote:

wrote:

The Publications Online Board is proud to open its new Revue
"Publications Online" to the scientific community.
This journal is available to rapidly publish scientific papers, on the
basis of the scientific commons license. A new Collaborative reviewing
process is the main characteristic of
this revue.
More information is available on our website http://www.pub-online.org
Thanks a lot for your interest.

The Publications Online Board
http://pub-online.org


Cool, Scientific Commons License sounds interesting.

That they resort to spamming Usenet says much about them. That their
home page is over a year old says more. That their articles ladder
lists a single ladder still more. That they spell 'review' using the
theatrical sense even more. Not to mention their revenue model being
based on Google advertising...

None of it very impressive.

Try the Public Library of Science (http://www.plos.org/), which does
have some drawbacks, but also appears to have a clue.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

Good morning Derek,
what a caricature !
It's true that we are working on this idea from more than one year
(but the site was not public). It's true that we are using google to
pay the web housing (audience is too small to hope more). It's true
that we have for now no article to present. But the interresting
things are the original ideas :

1) use Scientific common License to publish (yes, we are not the
one's).
2) prevent cryonism in science by opening the referee mechanism. (no
one else propose similar mechanism)

It's also true that we spam usenet. But only to attract publicity on
this mechanism.
We don't have to be impressive and science have not to be.
Publications Online will be only what you will do with this idea. If
you think it's a bad idea, don't use it, don't publish with pub-
online. But if you think that this idea may be interresting, just
present an article (even a small one) and try the process.
We are different from Plos, just an other idea. And emergent ideas are
peculiar to science.
Have a good (temperate) day (:-)),

The Publications Online Board
http://pub-online.org

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:37:49 -0700, in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:

Good morning Derek,
what a caricature !
It's true that we are working on this idea from more than one year
(but the site was not public). It's true that we are using google to
pay the web housing (audience is too small to hope more). It's true
that we have for now no article to present. But the interresting
things are the original ideas :

1) use Scientific common License to publish (yes, we are not the
one's).
2) prevent cryonism in science by opening the referee mechanism. (no
one else propose similar mechanism)

"Cryonism"? Has Alcore heard about this?

It's also true that we spam usenet. But only to attract publicity on
this mechanism.

Oh, well, if it's only to attract publicity, I guess spamming is OK,
then.

rolling eyes