|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1 /Brad Guth
Where’s the objective evidence that our Selene/moon is not the least
bit hollow? (solid as a rock seems rather highly unlikely, especially if there’s ongoing mineral compressions, decay and those pesky radioactive elements that coexist and thereby unavoidably produce various gasses, along with an off-center core that couldn’t have tidal migrated without leaving a porous interior of voids behind) Apparently our moon(Selene) also has hidden hydrogen peroxide(h2o2) within its 25 K cold traps, in that its decomposition release (such as triggered by way of the LCROSS surface impactor) provided those detectable hydroxyl radicals. “The ultraviolet visible spectrometer detected hydroxyl signatures just after impact that are consistent with a water vapor cloud in sunlight.” But where's our public funded science pertaining to the Earth-moon L1 (Selene L1)? In other words, how extra hot or ultra cold and what's all that ultra-extreme vacuum like? If those polar cold traps are suggesting an environment near 25 K (as reported by our LRO team of NASA approved wizards), then perhaps 3% of the time the Selene L1 environment might become considerably colder, as well as offering a vacuum of at least 3e-21 bar (a million fold less pressure than the lunar surface), which should only pull more heat out of that tidal enhanced near absolute vacuum environment, as well as otherwise allowing more heat in whenever exposed to direct plus indirect sunlight (including moon IR and earthshine) that’s available 97+% of the time. Since most everything original about our Apollo mission R&D and their obtained science along with their half century advanced technology is either missing, remains as need-to-know or public nondisclosure/ inaccessible, where's the other 99.9% of our public funded LRO science? Most of our Apollo missions were those surrounded by a physically dark as coal lunar terrain, as having converted the bulk of solar energy into secondary IR worth an average 1218 w/m2 (you’ll simply have to disregard all those mission images as having that surface albedo of 65+ % and offering nothing UV reactive). Otherwise such heat is heat (including earthshine that’s 50 times greater intensity than moonlight), and otherwise it’s exactly the same as being here on Earth except as if you were surrounded on all sides (including top to bottom by an array of 1218 watt/m2 radiant heat within each and every visible square meter for as far as the eye can see, as well as supposedly having essentially no significant atmospheric attenuation, as so much so toasty that even in the shade it would have remained extremely hot from all of that unavoidable surrounding secondary IR radiation. “LRO takes measurements from an altitude of about 31 miles, so researchers are not sure what dosages astronauts will see at the surface” Actually the direct solar energy of 1367 w/m2 (as raw/naked average solar energy w/UV is perhaps closer to 1630 w/m2) was also unavoidable. As equally the ultra extreme cold of what’s continually shaded within a deep polar crater being a low as 25 K (22 mw/m2) is obviously an example where as little as 4.7 mw/m2 of geothermal energy is available from that thick polar crust. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_Spectrum.png And why did I bother to say these exact same things as of nearly a decade ago, that our naked, crystal dry and highly electrostatic charged lunar surface of such physically dark and unusually dense mineral deposits, along with its issues of those significant mascons plus unavoidable secondary/recoil forms of local radiation that’s coming at you from all directions, was anything but DNA friendly. http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0912/20lroresults/ As sun activity increases, the impact of solar energetic particles will increase relative to galactic cosmic rays. "We are in a period during this historic solar minimum where the radiation rates are elevated but are at tolerable levels in terms of radiation risk," Spence said. But the CRaTER instrument also discovered unexpected levels of radiation closer to the lunar surface, where the moon should block cosmic rays. Many scientists believed the moon's mass would shield astronauts working on the surface, but LRO's discovery shows something on the moon is producing a secondary source of radiation. "The net affect could be that you don't get much help from the moon at all," Spence said. "In fact, some of the secondary particles might be even more hazardous in terms of their radiation dose." LRO takes measurements from an altitude of about 31 miles, so researchers are not sure what dosages astronauts will see at the surface. Spence said surface radiation levels from the secondary lunar source may be as high as the dose from galactic cosmic rays. A leading hypothesis for the lunar radiation source is the interaction between cosmic rays and soil. As energetic particles strike regolith, the collisions could liberate other particles and hurl them high above the moon. Spence said the revelations would not prohibit human exploration of the moon, but researchers are eager to learn more about the surprising radiation fluxes. As solar activity increases, LRO will gather information on radiation dangers posed by particles in the solar wind. LRO data, combined with results from a fleet of space weather monitors and solar observatories, will hopefully lead to more accurate forecasts of solar events emitting high radiation, according to Wargo. Such predictions are the "holy grail" for lunar scientists, Wargo said. "There are often precursors to the solar proton events, so you have some hope if you're outside a habitation or out of shielding to get back to some safer place where there's significant shielding," Spence said. "I think at the moon there are ways to mitigate and deal with both types of radiation risk." - This following context means the tidal offset core of our moon/Selene is perhaps more inert dead and subsequently colder than the subdued core of Mars. For the moment, I’ve estimated a lunar polar surface “cold trap” heat flux of 4.7 mw/m2 (surrounding terrain of secondary/ recoil IR making the LRO readings worth 22 mw/m2) .. http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0912/20lroresults/ "The moon has one of the most extreme thermal environments of any body in the solar system," said David Paige, principal investigator for the Diviner payload at the University of California, Los Angeles. In October, Diviner detected a cold trap in Hermite crater with temperatures of nearly -415 degrees Fahrenheit. "To put that kind of temperature into perspective, nothing like this has ever yet been measured in the solar system," Paige said. "One would have to maybe travel far beyond the Kuiper Belt to find an object with a temperature this low." - I’m finding it most interesting that so many of our best scientists are suddenly at shock and awe or other amazement as to what levels of extreme hot and cold and radiation risk our moon has to offer anyone standing upon its naked surface, especially as surrounded by all that unusually dense assortment of raw elements that’ll unavoidably turn cosmic energy into everything from soft X-rays to gamma., plus whatever our sun contributes directly and otherwise causing everything from the secondary/recoil IR average of 1217+ w/m2 (maximum 1452 w/m2) to that of hard X-rays that can rather easily become lethal saturation within as little as hours or even worse case minutes worth of exposure. Oddly, not one frame of any X-ray sensitive Kodak film from our Apollo era showed us any hint of such radiation dosage or even thermal trauma, as though it wasn’t even measurable or otherwise worth any further review. In the polar crater shade, the most flexible of moonsuit synthetic materials would become so cryogenic at 25 K they (whereas most gasses become liquids or solids) could crack or even cause artificial materials to shatter. (25 K is significantly colder than liquid nitrogen of 63 K), and a meter above that rather poorly warmed surface of such 3e-15 bar vacuum should be an even colder. Apparently my previous suggestions of digging in so as to having thermal stability and a few meters worth of basalt between your frail DNA and all of that surrounding surface radiation exposure was just foolishness on my part. However, in many places that unusual crust/ bedrock or composite soil of our physically dark moon is likely several times more background radioactive than Earth (exactly as though that moon isn’t nearly as old as Earth), so as for not being exactly inert or failsafe to human DNA even if you’re entirely situated deep underground. Essentially, it’s as though that moon is not made of Earth because, some of the gamma spectrographic mapped locations as offering thorium, uranium and radium deposits upon or within that moon will simply have to be avoided regardless of being dug in. So, just because the moon is potentially 0.1% hollow doesn’t insure that your frail DNA is going to be entirely safe within all such naturally or artificially made hollow locations. Potentially harmful mineral ores and deposits of whatever’s radioactive should have been easily mapped as of 4+ decades ago, because the sufficient technology having existed, at least to within a km2 resolution, and as of most recently a surface resolution of 10 x 10 or 100 m2 should have this surface background dosage nailed as to what sorts of heavy minerals and radioactive substances exist, and even to what likely depths. The UV fluorescence imaging and subsequent mapping of surface minerals should have been well established by now, by LRO in far greater detail than ever before. Odd there's not a peep of anything constructive about this colder than liquid nitrogen environment. At the cryogenic 25 K environment should accommodate loads of dry ice (solid CO2) plus solids of pure oxygen and perhaps even crystal solids of Radon starting at 200 K (because that moon does have its own radium plus numerous surface deposits). However, we can't even seem to deploy surface probes as safely soft- landed onto our physically dark moon(Selene) that offers direct readings from those polar craters of 25 K (that's actually way colder than liquid nitrogen), suggesting the moon itself is giving off something much less than 22 mw/m2. At 25 K there's a lot of potentially insulating gas (greenhouse gas) keeping such deep crater shadowed “cold traps” warmer than otherwise possible. (at 25 K even liquid nitrogen is going to be insulative) Too bad we don’t have any surface probe(s) reporting continuous objective data back from such extreme cold spots. It’s almost as though we actually do not have the necessary expertise and required technology of deploying such robotic probe landers. Also, we should only further imagine the terrific Stirling solar energy conversion at near 375 K differential/m2 (1000 m2 focused onto a hydrogen boiler and those unlimited cold energy sinks of something near 25 K is going to easily generate 821 kw of nearly continuous clean energy to do whatever with). The S3TEC Center of ongoing research offers 85.4% conversion, whereas it seems likely 1.2 MW per thousand m2 is technically obtainable, especially if such advanced PVs were applied on the most elevated lunar polar surface, whereas that sunlight is nearly continuous and still saturated with UV that PVs love to convert into electrons. http://s3tec.mit.edu/index.php?optio...1&It emid=100 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Our 99% hollow head of Guthball once again spewed...
On 1/2/2010 12:07 PM, BradGuth wrote:
Where’s the objective evidence that our Selene/moon is not the least Where's the objective evidence that Guthball has a brain? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1 / BradGuth
On Jan 2, 10:34*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 1/2/2010 12:07 PM, BradGuth wrote: Where’s the objective evidence that our Selene/moon is not the least Where's the objective evidence that Guthball has a brain? "Our 99% hollow head of Guthball once again spewed..." In other words, you've still got nothing whatsoever. Why don't you knock our socks off with the best available science you've got? How about some public funded supercomputer simulations, of how such a thick and mineral saturated crust as having quickly solidified, evolves along with a tidal offset core (supposedly of hot iron), and remains today as a passive solid without internal fluids (meaning crystal dry), as well as gasless and otherwise solid as any inert (zero decay) rock that's no longer affected by whatever tidal morphing or gravity compression forces? ~ BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1/ Brad Guth
On 1/2/2010 12:54 PM, BradGuth wrote:
More enane rambling snipped Hey, dimbulb, ever read this report? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/moonpr1.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1 /Brad Guth
On Jan 2, 11:22*am, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 1/2/2010 12:54 PM, BradGuth wrote: More enane rambling snipped Hey, dimbulb, ever read this report? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/moonpr1.htm Been there, done that NASA infomercial that was created for the LeapFrog certified likes of yourself, but thanks anyway. Ever heard of a geode rock? Earth has lots of nifty cavities and terrific geode pockets that are really big, not to mention those empty oil, gas and vast volumes of fresh water aquifer cavities that are near empty or having been seawater flooded. Thus far we've uncovered and/or having mapped the natural volumetric extent of perhaps 0.1% of what's available (should the need arise). ~ BG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1/ Brad Guth
On 1/2/2010 3:04 PM, BradGuth wrote:
On Jan 2, 11:22 am, wrote: On 1/2/2010 12:54 PM, BradGuth wrote: More enane rambling snipped Hey, dimbulb, ever read this report? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/moonpr1.htm Been there, done that NASA infomercial that was created for the LeapFrog certified likes of yourself, but thanks anyway. Ever heard of a geode rock? Earth has lots of nifty cavities and terrific geode pockets that are really big, not to mention those empty oil, gas and vast volumes of fresh water aquifer cavities that are near empty or having been seawater flooded. Thus far we've uncovered and/or having mapped the natural volumetric extent of perhaps0.1% of what's available (should the need arise). ~ BG Weeeeeeeeeeee. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1 /Brad Guth
On Jan 2, 1:40*pm, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 1/2/2010 3:04 PM, BradGuth wrote: On Jan 2, 11:22 am, *wrote: On 1/2/2010 12:54 PM, BradGuth wrote: More enane rambling snipped Hey, dimbulb, ever read this report? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/moonpr1.htm Been there, done that NASA infomercial that was created for the LeapFrog certified likes of yourself, but thanks anyway. Ever heard of a geode rock? Earth has lots of nifty cavities and terrific geode pockets that are really big, not to mention those empty oil, gas and vast volumes of fresh water aquifer cavities that are near empty or having been seawater flooded. *Thus far we've uncovered and/or having mapped the natural volumetric extent of perhaps0.1% of what's available (should the need arise). * ~ BG Weeeeeeeeeeee. Ever heard of vogs? Ever studied geology-101? Ever read a National Geographic? Ever give an honest **** about anything, other than yourself? ~ BG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1 /Brad Guth
On Jan 2, 1:40*pm, Nightcrawler wrote:
On 1/2/2010 3:04 PM, BradGuth wrote: On Jan 2, 11:22 am, *wrote: On 1/2/2010 12:54 PM, BradGuth wrote: More enane rambling snipped Hey, dimbulb, ever read this report? http://www.solarviews.com/eng/moonpr1.htm Been there, done that NASA infomercial that was created for the LeapFrog certified likes of yourself, but thanks anyway. Ever heard of a geode rock? Earth has lots of nifty cavities and terrific geode pockets that are really big, not to mention those empty oil, gas and vast volumes of fresh water aquifer cavities that are near empty or having been seawater flooded. *Thus far we've uncovered and/or having mapped the natural volumetric extent of perhaps0.1% of what's available (should the need arise). * ~ BG Weeeeeeeeeeee. Sorry about my vog brain-fart (make that "vugs") Ever heard of vugs? Ever studied geology-101? Ever read a National Geographic? Ever give an honest **** about anything, other than yourself? ~ BG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1 /Brad Guth
Earth has lots of nifty cavities and terrific volcanic formed voids,
plus geode pockets that are really big, not to mention those empty oil, gas, coal and other mineral wells/shafts and mines, plus otherwise terrific volumes of fresh water aquifer cavities that are near empty or having been intentionally seawater flooded. Thus far we've uncovered and/or having mapped the natural volumetric extent of perhaps 0.1% of what's available (should the need arise, the smart and less dumbfounded ones could survive underground). On behalf of those stuck in perpetual naysay, obfuscation and denial: Ever heard of vugs? Ever heard of a geode rock? Ever studied Earth geology-101? Ever read a National Geographic? Ever give an honest **** about anything, other than yourself? ~ BG On Jan 2, 10:07*am, BradGuth wrote: Where’s the objective evidence that our Selene/moon is not the least bit hollow? (solid as a rock seems rather highly unlikely, especially if there’s ongoing mineral compressions, decay and those pesky radioactive elements that coexist and thereby unavoidably produce various gasses, along with an off-center core that couldn’t have tidal migrated without leaving a porous interior of voids behind) Apparently our moon(Selene) also has hidden hydrogen peroxide(h2o2) within its 25 K cold traps, in that its decomposition release (such as triggered by way of the LCROSS surface impactor) provided those detectable hydroxyl radicals. *“The ultraviolet visible spectrometer detected hydroxyl signatures just after impact that are consistent with a water vapor cloud in sunlight.” But where's our public funded science pertaining to the Earth-moon L1 (Selene L1)? *In other words, how extra hot or ultra cold and what's all that ultra-extreme vacuum like? If those polar cold traps are suggesting an environment near 25 K (as reported by our LRO team of NASA approved wizards), then perhaps 3% of the time the Selene L1 environment might become considerably colder, as well as offering a vacuum of at least 3e-21 bar (a million fold less pressure than the lunar surface), which should only pull more heat out of that tidal enhanced near absolute vacuum environment, as well as otherwise allowing more heat in whenever exposed to direct plus indirect sunlight (including moon IR and earthshine) that’s available 97+% of the time. Since most everything original about our Apollo mission R&D and their obtained science along with their half century advanced technology is either missing, remains as need-to-know or public nondisclosure/ inaccessible, where's the other 99.9% of our public funded LRO science? Most of our Apollo missions were those surrounded by a physically dark as coal lunar terrain, as having converted the bulk of solar energy into secondary IR worth an average 1218 w/m2 (you’ll simply have to disregard all those mission images as having that surface albedo of 65+ % and offering nothing UV reactive). *Otherwise such heat is heat (including earthshine that’s 50 times greater intensity than moonlight), and otherwise it’s exactly the same as being here on Earth except as if you were surrounded on all sides (including top to bottom by an array of 1218 watt/m2 radiant heat within each and every visible square meter for as far as the eye can see, as well as supposedly having essentially no significant atmospheric attenuation, as so much so toasty that even in the shade it would have remained extremely hot from all of that unavoidable surrounding secondary IR radiation. *“LRO takes measurements from an altitude of about 31 miles, so researchers are not sure what dosages astronauts will see at the surface” Actually the direct solar energy of 1367 w/m2 (as raw/naked average solar energy w/UV is perhaps closer to 1630 w/m2) was also unavoidable. *As equally the ultra extreme cold of what’s continually shaded within a deep polar crater being a low as 25 K (22 mw/m2) is obviously an example where as little as 4.7 mw/m2 of geothermal energy is available from that thick polar crust. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_Spectrum.png And why did I bother to say these exact same things as of nearly a decade ago, that our naked, crystal dry and highly electrostatic charged lunar surface of such physically dark and unusually dense mineral deposits, along with its issues of those significant mascons plus unavoidable secondary/recoil forms of local radiation that’s coming at you from all directions, was anything but DNA friendly. *http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0912/20lroresults/ *As sun activity increases, the impact of solar energetic particles will increase relative to galactic cosmic rays. "We are in a period during this historic solar minimum where the radiation rates are elevated but are at tolerable levels in terms of radiation risk," Spence said. But the CRaTER instrument also discovered unexpected levels of radiation closer to the lunar surface, where the moon should block cosmic rays. Many scientists believed the moon's mass would shield astronauts working on the surface, but LRO's discovery shows something on the moon is producing a secondary source of radiation. "The net affect could be that you don't get much help from the moon at all," Spence said. "In fact, some of the secondary particles might be even more hazardous in terms of their radiation dose." LRO takes measurements from an altitude of about 31 miles, so researchers are not sure what dosages astronauts will see at the surface. Spence said surface radiation levels from the secondary lunar source may be as high as the dose from galactic cosmic rays. A leading hypothesis for the lunar radiation source is the interaction between cosmic rays and soil. As energetic particles strike regolith, the collisions could liberate other particles and hurl them high above the moon. Spence said the revelations would not prohibit human exploration of the moon, but researchers are eager to learn more about the surprising radiation fluxes. As solar activity increases, LRO will gather information on radiation dangers posed by particles in the solar wind. LRO data, combined with results from a fleet of space weather monitors and solar observatories, will hopefully lead to more accurate forecasts of solar events emitting high radiation, according to Wargo. Such predictions are the "holy grail" for lunar scientists, Wargo said. "There are often precursors to the solar proton events, so you have some hope if you're outside a habitation or out of shielding to get back to some safer place where there's significant shielding," Spence said. "I think at the moon there are ways to mitigate and deal with both types of radiation risk." - This following context means the tidal offset core of our moon/Selene is perhaps more inert dead and subsequently colder than the subdued core of Mars. *For the moment, I’ve estimated a lunar polar surface “cold trap” heat flux of 4.7 mw/m2 (surrounding terrain of secondary/ recoil IR making the LRO readings worth 22 mw/m2) . *http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0912/20lroresults/ *"The moon has one of the most extreme thermal environments of any body in the solar system," said David Paige, principal investigator for the Diviner payload at the University of California, Los Angeles. In October, Diviner detected a cold trap in Hermite crater with temperatures of nearly -415 degrees Fahrenheit. "To put that kind of temperature into perspective, nothing like this has ever yet been measured in the solar system," Paige said. "One would have to maybe travel far beyond the Kuiper Belt to find an object with a temperature this low." - I’m finding it most interesting that so many of our best scientists are suddenly at shock and awe or other amazement as to what levels of extreme hot and cold and radiation risk our moon has to offer anyone standing upon its naked surface, especially as surrounded by all that unusually dense assortment of raw elements that’ll unavoidably turn cosmic energy into everything from soft X-rays to gamma., plus whatever our sun contributes directly and otherwise causing everything from the secondary/recoil IR average of 1217+ w/m2 (maximum 1452 w/m2) to that of hard X-rays that can rather easily become lethal saturation within as little as hours or even worse case minutes worth of exposure. *Oddly, not one frame of any X-ray sensitive Kodak film from our Apollo era showed us any hint of such radiation dosage or even thermal trauma, as though it wasn’t even measurable or otherwise worth any further review. In the polar crater shade, the most flexible of moonsuit synthetic materials would become so cryogenic at 25 K they (whereas most gasses become liquids or solids) could crack or even cause artificial materials to shatter. (25 K is significantly colder than liquid nitrogen of 63 K), and a meter above that rather poorly warmed surface of such 3e-15 bar vacuum should be an even colder. Apparently my previous suggestions of digging in so as to having thermal stability and a few meters worth of basalt between your frail DNA and all of that surrounding surface radiation exposure was just foolishness on my part. *However, in many places that unusual crust/ bedrock or composite soil of our physically dark moon is likely several times more background radioactive than Earth (exactly as though that moon isn’t nearly as old as Earth), so as for not being exactly inert or failsafe to human DNA even if you’re entirely situated deep underground. *Essentially, it’s as though that moon is not made of Earth because, some of the gamma spectrographic mapped locations as offering thorium, uranium and radium deposits upon or within that moon will simply have to be avoided regardless of being dug in. So, just because the moon is potentially 0.1% hollow doesn’t insure that your frail DNA is going to be entirely safe within all such naturally or artificially made hollow locations. *Potentially harmful mineral ores and deposits of whatever’s radioactive should have been easily mapped as of 4+ decades ago, because the sufficient technology having existed, at least to within a km2 resolution, and as of most recently a surface resolution of 10 x 10 or 100 m2 should have this surface background dosage nailed as to what sorts of heavy minerals and radioactive substances exist, and even to what likely depths. *The UV fluorescence imaging and subsequent mapping of surface minerals should have been well established by now, by LRO in far greater detail than ever before. Odd there's not a peep of anything constructive about this colder than liquid nitrogen environment. *At the cryogenic 25 K environment should accommodate loads of dry ice (solid CO2) plus solids of pure oxygen and perhaps even crystal solids of Radon starting at 200 K (because that moon does have its own radium plus numerous surface deposits). However, we can't even seem to deploy surface probes as safely soft- landed onto our physically dark moon(Selene) that offers direct readings from those polar craters of 25 K (that's actually way colder than liquid nitrogen), suggesting the moon itself is giving off something much less than 22 mw/m2. At 25 K there's a lot of potentially insulating gas (greenhouse gas) keeping such deep crater shadowed “cold traps” warmer than otherwise possible. (at 25 K even liquid nitrogen is going to be insulative) Too bad we don’t have any surface probe(s) reporting continuous objective data back from such extreme cold spots. *It’s almost as though we actually do not have the necessary expertise and required technology of deploying such robotic probe landers. *Also, we should only further imagine the terrific Stirling solar energy conversion at near 375 K differential/m2 (1000 m2 focused onto a hydrogen boiler and those unlimited cold energy sinks of something near 25 K is going to easily generate 821 kw of nearly continuous clean energy to do whatever with). The S3TEC Center of ongoing research offers 85.4% conversion, whereas it seems likely 1.2 MW per thousand m2 is technically obtainable, especially if such advanced PVs were applied on the most elevated lunar polar surface, whereas that sunlight is nearly continuous and still saturated with UV that PVs love to convert into electrons. *http://s3tec.mit.edu/index.php?optio...article&id=81&... * Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1/ Brad Guth
On 1/2/2010 4:15 PM, BradGuth wrote:
Ever heard of vogs? Ever studied geology-101? Ever read a National Geographic? Ever give an honest **** about anything, other than yourself? Quit talking to/about yourself. It makes you look bad. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Our 0.11% hollow moon, and near infinite vacuum of Selene L1/... | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | November 13th 09 05:25 PM |
The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth | BradGuth | Astronomy Misc | 103 | November 6th 09 11:50 AM |
The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth | BradGuth | Policy | 1 | September 15th 09 03:47 AM |
The 1% hollow moon / Brad Guth | BradGuth | Policy | 1 | July 19th 09 09:19 PM |
The 1% hollow moon / Brad Guth | Six of Nine or Half-dozen of the Oher | Policy | 0 | July 17th 09 06:50 PM |