Faith Based Scientists Paranoid About Possible Mars Life

""Peter Bjørn Perlsø"" wrote in message
...
Yes, "And god created man in his image" and all that entails needs a
good debunking.

I've always preferred to think of that as referring more towards mental or
psychological than physical. Doesn't Ezekiel say that God has 7 ears and 7
eyes?

God wrote:

Even less likely than brine I'm afraid. CO2 doesn't have a wide range of
temp/pressure in which it is liquid and motile.


You didn't look at that phase diagram, did you?
http://scifun.chem.wisc.edu/chemweek...se_diagram.gif
We had a fire extinguisher full of liquid CO2 in our house, I used it to
put out a woman's car fire one night.
CO2's triple point (-56.6 C) is within ten degrees centigrade of the
average temperature of Mars (-63 C).

Pat

Scott Hedrick wrote:

""Peter Bjørn Perlsø"" wrote in message
...
Yes, "And god created man in his image" and all that entails needs a
good debunking.

I've always preferred to think of that as referring more towards mental or
psychological than physical. Doesn't Ezekiel say that God has 7 ears and 7
eyes?

Beats me. Bu the church faithful have always assumed that *man* had a
special place in the center of the universe.

Lets see how that fares once ETs pop up.

--
regards , Peter B. P. - http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk

"If guns kill, do pencils cause spelling errors?"

Scott Hedrick wrote:
I've always preferred to think of that as referring more towards mental or
psychological than physical. Doesn't Ezekiel say that God has 7 ears and 7
eyes?


Sounds Hindu.
Either that, or he read the wrong passage out of "The Necronomicon".
Here's the juicy stuff from old Zeke:
http://www.justbible.com/Chapters/B26C023.htm

Pat

God wrote:
Even less likely than brine I'm afraid. CO2 doesn't have a wide range
of
temp/pressure in which it is liquid and motile.


"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
You didn't look at that phase diagram, did you?
http://scifun.chem.wisc.edu/chemweek...se_diagram.gif
We had a fire extinguisher full of liquid CO2 in our house, I used it to
put out a woman's car fire one night.
CO2's triple point (-56.6 C) is within ten degrees centigrade of the
average temperature of Mars (-63 C).

Snicker. And you need a minimum of around 400 bar to keep the stuff
liquid - more if the temp rises a bit.

You don't increase the pressure on a liquid by simply dumping a pile of
stone on top of it. try doing that with a cup of water by dumping a hand
full of sand into the cup. Does the surface pressure go up?

Nope.

So what's the pressure of on CO2, 1, 10, 200, 2000 feet below ground
level? Essentially the same as it is at ground level. 6 millibars, not 400
bars.

Liquid... Ahahahahahahahahahahah.....

"Pat Flannery" wrote
Well, let's see... we've got a planet whose atmosphere is primarily CO2,

No, you have a planet whose atmosphere is primarily GONE.

"Pat Flannery" wrote
which has CO2 snow at its icecaps, and has eruptions of CO2 gas at its
south pole.

Which has CO2 and water ice at its ice caps and possible eruptions of CO2
at it's southern pole during spring when the CO2 ice fields melt from the
bottom up.


"Pat Flannery" wrote
So we've got lots of solid and gaseous CO2, and at Martian temperatures
all that is needed to get liquid CO2 is some pressure, like you'd find
underground for instance.

Liquids feel no exstra pressure under ground. If they did, then they
would simply rise to the surface.

Stupid... Stupid.. Flannery.



"Pat Flannery" wrote
On the other hand, water vapor in the atmosphere is extremely scarce to
undetectable,

The observation of fog in low lying areas and surface frost (water) are
commonplace.



"Pat Flannery" wrote
we haven't yet seen any liquid water running around on
the surface even down in the Hellas basin in high summer, and the only
two ways we can have it underground are via some sort of exotic hydrogen
peroxide/water mixture or internal heating of the planet by latent
vulcanism...

Or maybe something else. I think something else.

Lets go see.


"Pat Flannery" wrote
Of course we do have the report on the H2O2 containing Mars critters
that's co-authored by the parapsychologist, so maybe he knows, being
that he's in psychic contact with them. :-D

Doubtful. But even if he thought so, he would still make more sense than
George, Can't find them WMD I promised were there, Bush.

I recall some of you posting that you think religion etc. will be
disproved someday. Maybe. I have very high doubts that the disproof of
a God will have any effect on the general public though. I've quoted
this guy before, and I'll quote him again, this is very well put:

"I don't think that mankind is going to give up religion, even
fundamentalism, anytime in the foreseeable future.
For one thing, to really understand science and the way the universe
works requires knowledge in math, physics,
chemistry, biology, and other fields. And most devout people are
unwilling and/or unable to exert the effort to
acquire that knowledge. And given the poor quality of most public
schools and the mind-rotting content of most mass media, I don't
think that is going to change. So while mankind's knowledge of
science will continue to expand, the percentage of the population who
understand that science will continue to shrink. And that means that
religion, and especially fundamentalism, will continue to thrive."
- John Salisbury

"Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X" wrote
I recall some of you posting that you think religion etc. will be
disproved someday. Maybe. I have very high doubts that the disproof of
a God will have any effect on the general public though. I've quoted
this guy before, and I'll quote him again, this is very well put:

Religion will be gone once man has gone, in roughly 200-300 years.

If man is lucky a few of he species will be kept as pets by our machine
offspring.

wrote:
I had a brief look at that link.

I wouldn't word it in quite the way that the previous person did but
I do have to ask why religious people seem to think that atheists are
looking for a reason to believe as if we are "missing" something.

I do not seek a reason to believe in a god and am perfectly at ease
being an atheist.

I hope I live long enough to see the religious reaction to the almost
inevitable discovery of life outside out planet. Their "holy
books" will need a certain amount of revision.

Why is it inevitable?

I think the discovery of microbes or non-sentient life would have no
impact on any religion, including atheism.

Intelligent beings, on the other hand, would lead to the questions.
Equally the lack of sentient beings (the Fermi Paradox) could be seen
as some evidence in favour of "religion".

"Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X" wrote in message
ups.com

I recall some of you posting that you think religion etc. will be
disproved someday.

I've never once said such a thing, nor having implied such. Sorry about
that.

"I don't think that mankind is going to give up religion, even
fundamentalism, anytime in the foreseeable future.
For one thing, to really understand science and the way the universe
works requires knowledge in math, physics,
chemistry, biology, and other fields. And most devout people are
unwilling and/or unable to exert the effort to
acquire that knowledge. And given the poor quality of most public
schools and the mind-rotting content of most mass media, I don't
think that is going to change. So while mankind's knowledge of
science will continue to expand, the percentage of the population who
understand that science will continue to shrink. And that means that
religion, and especially fundamentalism, will continue to thrive."
- John Salisbury

I agree, as having stipluated that ETs most likely have a faith-based
reality much like ours, just not nearly a screwed up and/or otherwise
downright sicko perverted as ours.

Unfortunately, the vast bulk of humanity as sequestered upon Earth would
much rather be snookered and thus easily dumbfounded into believing in
anything that doesn't rock their good ship LOLLIPOP. In other words,
telling the truth is for the birds.
-
Brad Guth






--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG