A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is the Moon Hollow? Sleuths?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old October 2nd 04, 03:05 AM
Brilliant One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Double-A

Comet?


sure. why not?

chuck in persia

Comet,
or softsoap?
I'm a terrible housecleaner,
don't you know?

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

  #22  
Old October 2nd 04, 03:53 AM
nachogrande
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Brilliant One" wrote in message
...
Double-A

Comet?


sure. why not?

chuck in persia

Comet,
or softsoap?
I'm a terrible housecleaner,
don't you know?


And more than likely not an old car person.

chuck in persia


  #23  
Old October 3rd 04, 08:18 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

The bucky balls that we find that came to the Earth from outer space
should be opened. My theory has it that Aliens would use such an
indestructible(almost) to plant a message that says "We Are not Alone" A
physical message instead of a micro wave one. Darla could be seeding the
cosmos with trillions,and trillions of such messenger bucky balls as I
type. Thinking of Darla begs the question "Where is nightbat?" Hmmmm I
don't trust those two. I should never told Darla my age. She tricked me
into it by telling me she was 2 million Earth years old. (go figure)
Bert


nightbat

The lead Maverick thinker is always here Bert keeping watch over
the other wild free thinking ones. And when you throw darts in the right
direction Bert, no need to interfere because you're keeping up and on
the right tract with nightbat. You also haven't mentioned any of your
normal sci fi book friends or ideas which is good, only how you are
beginning to like comets more and more.

Even good follow Zinni isn't really complaining too much just rightly
clarifying about the J H Oort cloud theory versus the Kuiper belt. Life
begets life, no comet can create life only provide the right conditions
for more complex life to evolve once the seed of life lands there. The
Halo living bacteria (ium) apparently is older then any known other life
form, and some have even asked me is it then God itself? I explain
physics and astro science is not concerned with religion or its
resultant implications of its research pointing findings, with the
biophysical aspect and cellluar mechanism or entities are a purview of
astro biology and biological basic 1st life cosmos candidate not of its
origination or purpose. At most, the implications is that this referred
germ life ( Halo ) was pointing around for a very long time since it can
repair its own DNA and live where mostly no other known higher evolved
life form can. Where or what or from whom it came from or how it came to
exist is an unknown, only that it permits further evolved cellular
higher life forms to spring forth from its natural positive particular
environment altering producing processes.

My " Black Comet " theory is not a cause of life only a presented
resolution premise for the black hole mathematical enigma. All the other
strong gravity field formed now present normal gravity free shooting
comet bodies are only theoretically broken off fragments or babies of
the mother of all comets, the nightbat one. The Oort cloud in our galaxy
is the remains of the blasted off immense heavy original ice shell of
the Earth's once " Black Comet " outer ice shell body as it relatively
slowed and came back into its new galactic formed tail trailing uniform
momentum. The gravitational shock waves caused by its final abrupt stage
slowing down to more uniform internal galactic rotation in nightbat
referred theory caused the outer heavy ice shell to break up and remain
in distance but pointing location outer galactic particular location.
The immense kinetic momentum potential of the Oort cloud group comets
still remains and manifests itself whenever a fragment breaks off and
freely travels within our, as seen, internal galactic domain.

And yes Bert, according to nightbat theory the Oort cloud and some of
those solar system planetary moons like Earth's and even distant larger
planets are just broken off fragments of the Earth's once immense "
Black Comet's " free fall built up ice and dust formed and final stage
blasted off heavy ice shell. Only the dynamics of a collapsed neutron
star metamorphosed " Black Comet " new theoretical strong gravity field
highly condensed matter boson composed body has enough energy to form
the amount of concentrated iron and water as exists now on amazing
unique planet Earth.


the nightbat

  #24  
Old October 3rd 04, 12:04 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi nightbat Glad to see you are posting. I don't see any interference
taking place with your brain waves and mine. Is see only parrel waves
that might never get to meet.(so what) Yes Zinni has treated me rather
nice these days(he mellowed with age) I'm going with the establishment
its a Oort "cloud" (this now just gave me todays "What If" thought.
nightbat I like the Term you used "heavy ice" That sounds like something
that would go with "cold fusion" Well I'm working on comet ice. We
know water breaks down into its two elements when hit by the radiation
of our sun. This radiation dims very fast with distance and the Oort
"cloud" is plenty far away. Even Uranus's icy moons seem to be safe,and
the ice that is part of Saturn's rings. We find ice close to the sun
when its rays are blocked,or when its rays are very weak. Bert

  #25  
Old October 4th 04, 12:45 AM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote in message ...
nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

The bucky balls that we find that came to the Earth from outer space
should be opened. My theory has it that Aliens would use such an
indestructible(almost) to plant a message that says "We Are not Alone" A
physical message instead of a micro wave one. Darla could be seeding the
cosmos with trillions,and trillions of such messenger bucky balls as I
type. Thinking of Darla begs the question "Where is nightbat?" Hmmmm I
don't trust those two. I should never told Darla my age. She tricked me
into it by telling me she was 2 million Earth years old. (go figure)
Bert


nightbat

The lead Maverick thinker is always here Bert keeping watch over
the other wild free thinking ones. And when you throw darts in the right
direction Bert, no need to interfere because you're keeping up and on
the right tract with nightbat. You also haven't mentioned any of your
normal sci fi book friends or ideas which is good, only how you are
beginning to like comets more and more.

Even good follow Zinni isn't really complaining too much just rightly
clarifying about the J H Oort cloud theory versus the Kuiper belt. Life
begets life, no comet can create life only provide the right conditions
for more complex life to evolve once the seed of life lands there. The
Halo living bacteria (ium) apparently is older then any known other life
form, and some have even asked me is it then God itself? I explain
physics and astro science is not concerned with religion or its
resultant implications of its research pointing findings, with the
biophysical aspect and cellluar mechanism or entities are a purview of
astro biology and biological basic 1st life cosmos candidate not of its
origination or purpose. At most, the implications is that this referred
germ life ( Halo ) was pointing around for a very long time since it can
repair its own DNA and live where mostly no other known higher evolved
life form can. Where or what or from whom it came from or how it came to
exist is an unknown, only that it permits further evolved cellular
higher life forms to spring forth from its natural positive particular
environment altering producing processes.

My " Black Comet " theory is not a cause of life only a presented
resolution premise for the black hole mathematical enigma. All the other
strong gravity field formed now present normal gravity free shooting
comet bodies are only theoretically broken off fragments or babies of
the mother of all comets, the nightbat one. The Oort cloud in our galaxy
is the remains of the blasted off immense heavy original ice shell of
the Earth's once " Black Comet " outer ice shell body as it relatively
slowed and came back into its new galactic formed tail trailing uniform
momentum. The gravitational shock waves caused by its final abrupt stage
slowing down to more uniform internal galactic rotation in nightbat
referred theory caused the outer heavy ice shell to break up and remain
in distance but pointing location outer galactic particular location.
The immense kinetic momentum potential of the Oort cloud group comets
still remains and manifests itself whenever a fragment breaks off and
freely travels within our, as seen, internal galactic domain.

And yes Bert, according to nightbat theory the Oort cloud and some of
those solar system planetary moons like Earth's and even distant larger
planets are just broken off fragments of the Earth's once immense "
Black Comet's " free fall built up ice and dust formed and final stage
blasted off heavy ice shell. Only the dynamics of a collapsed neutron
star metamorphosed " Black Comet " new theoretical strong gravity field
highly condensed matter boson composed body has enough energy to form
the amount of concentrated iron and water as exists now on amazing
unique planet Earth.


the nightbat



Well, the nightbat returns!

Thanks for your further explanation of your Black Comet theory.

I think your most important idea, however, is the identification of
the Halo bacteria as the most probable agent of panspermia.

It is said that meteorites of lunar origin fall to the Earth all the
time. I saw one estimate that the Earth receives up to a half ton of
material of Martian origin every year. The meteor impact that is said
to have killed the dynosaurs is also thought to have launched millions
of Earth rocks into space, many of which were capable of carrying
life. So the planets do exchange materials, and possibly life. The
same could be true on the larger scale of interstellar space. Perhaps
comets are the carriers of life between the stars.

The question remains of whether the Halo bacteria merely seeds life,
which then undergoes a long process of Darwinian natural selection to
evolve into higher forms, or does the Halo bacteria already have the
higher life forms programmed into its DNA, as Fred Hoyle thought?
That would explain, for instance, why plants have genes that are
parallel to the genes that produce our human blood.

But it all just pushes further back into the mists of time how life
originated in the first place.

The God bacterium?

Double-A
  #26  
Old October 4th 04, 02:02 AM
Brilliant One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I concur!
I'll chas(t)e down rhymes.
For you. Catch those filthy curs,
Yet?! Give'm the cosmic wash:
[$`@x#\+]
Make'm pay, whatya say?
Love ya...
Me, V.

Double-A posted:

seeding the
cosmos with trillions,and trillions of such messenger bucky balls a


Where is nightbat?" Hmmmm I
don't trust those two


keeping watch over
the other wild free thinking ones. And when you throw darts in the right
direction


right tract with nightbat

book friends or ideas which is good, only how you are
beginning


Life
begets life, no comet can create life only provide the right conditions
for more complex life to evolve once the seed of life lands there.


1st life cosmos candidate not of its
origination or purpose.


( Halo ) was pointing around for a very long time since it can
repair its own DNA and live where mostly no other known higher evolved
life form can. BR


life forms to spring forth from its natural positive particular
environment altering producing processes.


resolution premise for the black hole mathematical enigma.

babies of
the mother of all comets, the nightbat one.


Earth rocks into space

Halo bacteria already have the
higher life forms programmed into its DNA, as Fred Hoyle thought?

it all just pushes further back into the mists of time how life
originated in the first place.

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

  #27  
Old October 4th 04, 01:09 PM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

Hi nightbat Glad to see you are posting. I don't see any interference
taking place with your brain waves and mine. Is see only parrel waves
that might never get to meet.(so what) Yes Zinni has treated me rather
nice these days(he mellowed with age) I'm going with the establishment
its a Oort "cloud" (this now just gave me todays "What If" thought.
nightbat I like the Term you used "heavy ice" That sounds like something
that would go with "cold fusion" Well I'm working on comet ice. We
know water breaks down into its two elements when hit by the radiation
of our sun. This radiation dims very fast with distance and the Oort
"cloud" is plenty far away. Even Uranus's icy moons seem to be safe,and
the ice that is part of Saturn's rings. We find ice close to the sun
when its rays are blocked,or when its rays are very weak. Bert


nightbat

Yes Bert, it's all about real world framing or anchoring not
pure hypothetical fantasy based intricate math or other non real based
sci fi concept imagining. Sci fi can be very important if it has at
least just one referenced real world basis to expound on or from, but
pure wishful mental ramblings with no correlating pointing evidence to
justify its possibility is just that, wishful thinking. You will gain a
serious researchers interest with possibility not just catchy sounding
hype, for a researchers time is very limited and normal subject insight
well tuned.

As I have informed you Bert, my model allows me to see the Universe from
very different bat eyes then the just apparent physical or elusive
quantum one. Understanding comets is one of the keys to gaining deeper
fundamental workings of the cosmos dynamics in its state of non uniform
momentum. How the Universe can be apparently expanding while seeming to
be steady state or Dr. Einstein deduced mathematical static, including
big bang model fitting but still not quite right? How could so many
dedicated brilliant scientists be apparently wrong, and yet so many of
their particular framing be right? What is the larger picture that would
permit their own profound particular logical observations to make final
sense? How can comets fly against the normal force of solar system
gravity and fuel their observed timeless cyclical flights? Where do they
get all this energy from until their gravity free flights cross paths
with a fixed rotating galactic gravitational solar or planetary body?

When doing abstract mathematical or logical topological modeling you
must remember to understand the basic substance your basing the model
upon, eternal energy. Eternity or something eternal is a very difficult
theoretical concept to understand let alone try to model. But it has now
been mathematical proofed so it exists as real whether in the physical
or quantum and extremely and deeply far reaching in its implications.
Dr. Einstein realized topologically the energy Universe and attempted to
analyze it from an applied and observed physical and theoretical
originating point to an infinite one and even curved space back
again , hence the static concept. But the Hubble observed Universe is
not slowing down but actually expanding at a greater rate not complying
with a theoretical or mathematical pointing static one. The problem is
that energy can never have a point or beginning because it itself is
eternal. So on a topological line

E eternity-------Static Universe-------E eternity

Where can your Einstein energy based Universe beginning point ever be,
since the Universe itself is not static nor total uniform motion ability
returning but made of constant motion eternal energy in disturbed
geodesic world lines? You can only therefore at best have an originating
point of disturbed state or field from uniform eternal energy not its
basic origination or self static return. Hence the mathematical enigma
of

point zero volume total energy/matter-----eternity-----back to start

Nor a steady state one of

E eternity-----Steady State Universe-----E eternity

Because the Universe is constantly in a state of non uniform momentum
not a steady state uniform one.

Nor a big bang beginning one of

eternity----point energy/matter beginning Universe----E eternity

Because energy can have no point beginning or end

Nor just an observed expanding one

E eternity-----Expanding Universe-----E eternity

Because the Universe is bound by observed counter gravitational, strong,
weak, and electromagnetic force.

Nor an theoretical and or mathematical pointing strong gravity multi
black hole condensing or collapsing one

E eternity-----Collapsing Universe-----E eternity

Because the Universe is observed still expanding despite the immense
pull of theorized and apparent observed point center and arm galactic
strong gravity events.


What is the Universe actually doing to hopefully explain why so many
brilliant scientists tried to observe it and understand it but only got
a glimpse of Mother Nature's undergarments? I gave you the missing frame
answer in your search for cause of gravity, remember the hint, a
disturbed uniform field in attempt at renormalization.

E eternity----Disturbed uniform field Universe-----E eternity


ponder on,
the nightbat

  #28  
Old October 4th 04, 07:37 PM
PolarTemp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What is the Universe actually doing to hopefully explain why so many
brilliant scientists tried to observe it and understand it but only got
a glimpse of Mother Nature's undergarments? I gave you the missing frame
answer in your search for cause of gravity, remember the hint, a
disturbed uniform field in attempt at renormalization.

E eternity----Disturbed uniform field Universe-----E eternity

ponder on,
the nightbat

Gravitas.
Matter matters.
Spirit matters, evoving matter.
See book: "The Developing Mind," by Daniel Siegel.
Nature & nuture interact, change the physical world, same principles as
Darwin's original: forces shape matter.

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

  #29  
Old October 5th 04, 11:41 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat wrote

PolarTemp wrote:

What is the Universe actually doing to hopefully explain why so many
brilliant scientists tried to observe it and understand it but only got
a glimpse of Mother Nature's undergarments? I gave you the missing frame
answer in your search for cause of gravity, remember the hint, a
disturbed uniform field in attempt at renormalization.

E eternity----Disturbed uniform field Universe-----E eternity

ponder on,
the nightbat

Gravitas.
Matter matters.
Spirit matters, evoving matter.
See book: "The Developing Mind," by Daniel Siegel.
Nature & nuture interact, change the physical world, same principles as
Darwin's original: forces shape matter.

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A


nightbat

Yes Brilliant One, per Darwin's assessment, forces shape matter
and set in motion non uniform force requires an equal or greater force
to return observed effected non uniform energy and matter to uniform
momentum energy.


the nightbat

  #30  
Old October 5th 04, 11:53 AM
PolarTemp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

nightbat

Yes Brilliant One, per Darwin's assessment, forces shape matter
and set in motion non uniform force requires an equal or greater force
to return observed effected non uniform energy and matter to uniform
momentum energy.


the nightbat


Night, Mum,
Over & out.
Thanks everyone!
Superkewl!
Great soiree.
Comeback & play ~
Sleepy time for me.
Meet you
In Morning Wood.
Night
Bat.
Got that?

_______
Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me!
A
HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal
s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo Buzz alDredge Astronomy Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The apollo faq the inquirer Astronomy Misc 11 April 22nd 04 06:23 AM
significant addition to section 25 of the faq heat Astronomy Misc 1 April 15th 04 01:20 AM
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) Nathan Jones UK Astronomy 8 February 4th 04 06:48 PM
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 Nathan Jones Misc 20 November 11th 03 07:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.