|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dynamics of an Earth Ring
Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the
context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Alasdair -- erect featherless biped www.digitalmystic.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Why do you want to use missiles to hollow it out? I suspect that smaller scale engineering would be better in order to preserve the structure since an asteroid isn't usually large enough for gravity to glue it together. And then I would be inclined to glue the debris onto the outside or stuff it into string bags so that I could use it later if I wanted to move the asteroid. Stephen |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Alasdair ) wrote:
: "AA Institute" wrote in message : om... : Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the : context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. : : Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future : engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. : Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles : that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. : The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system : around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- : : http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html : : My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know : what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent : orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my : hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any : circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane : of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about : interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? : Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini : studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long : term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth : in the future? : : Abdul Ahad : I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Saturn has several moons and its rings don't seem to mind. I don't doubt that the moon would have an effect but prevent the forming? No, I don't believe that. Eric : Alasdair : -- : erect featherless biped : www.digitalmystic.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Alasdair" . uk wrote in news:cjgn48
: "AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I think the moon would prevent the ring from forming properly Alasdair There is currently a ring around earth. If you ever look at a 3-D type map of satelites, (like J-Track 3D http://science.nasa.gov/RealTime/JTr.../JTrack3D.html) you'll see that the satellites in geostationary orbit make a nice ring around earth :-) There's a couple gotchas to this statement...first J-Track blows up the relative size of the dot of light relative to the earth to many, many, many times the actual size of the spacecraft, so it appears more populated than it is (true...real rings aren't solid, but this is pushing it). I heard once jupiter had a very small ring that we only discovered when we sent probes in close to it...anyone know more info about this? Also, all these man made satellites have position keeping thrusters, to compensate for things like the moon. I have no idea as to what would happen to this "ring" if they suddenly just turned them all off, but I don't think anything major would happen very fast. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"AA Institute" wrote in message om... Before anybody gives me that look...this question is totally in the context of a "what if" kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose an asteroid somehow, through some super, far future engineering achievement has been captured into orbit around the Earth. Now suppose we want to carve it out by detonating a series of missiles that incrementally hollow their way into the body of such an asteroid. The material excavated out of the body would create a thin ring system around the Earth, as I try to illustrate he- http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagen...arth-ring.html My main concern with such a project is one of SAFETY. I'd like to know what a *safe* perigee (minimum) altitude would be necessary to prevent orbital decay of ring material. I don't want any material from my hypothetical ring system coming down toward the Earth under any circumstances. Would the ring material be contained in a narrow plane of fixed orbital incline, or would it scatter over time? What about interactivity with particles trapped in the Van Allen radiation belts? Is there any learnings from the Voyager studies (and now Cassini studies) of Saturnian rings that could be used to predict the long term stability of such a *hypothetical* ring system around the Earth in the future? Abdul Ahad I don't need to know any science to suggest you do not do this if you positively don't want any bits to rain down at all! Why? Ever heard of Martian meteorites? Well, the mere fact that we have them suggests that whenever you start knocking chunks off of celestial bodies, the things eventually go far and wide. If you have the tech to capture it, and orbit it, then you probably have the technology to land it, relatively softly, on the moon, so take it there, and cut it up at your leisure, whatever you want it for. Brian -- Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: __________________________________________________ __________________________ __________________________________ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.771 / Virus Database: 518 - Release Date: 28/09/2004 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Maudsley" wrote in message
Why do you want to use missiles to hollow it out? Bearing in mind that most asteroids are quite dense, often with some metallic composition, then some heavy blasting will be necessary to get fairly rapid results. I just realised there is a problem with this idea, missile impacts would leave the hole radioactive. But if post detonation radioactivity only affects the asteroid's inner walls down to a few inches in depth, then small scale robotic diggers which excavate a few inches of rock all the way around the interior of the hole and then blowing them out of the hole with perhaps compressed air, could eliminate the radioactiveness. RATs (rock abrasion tools) on the Mars rovers do something similar today. I suspect that smaller scale engineering would be better in order to preserve the structure since an asteroid isn't usually large enough for gravity to glue it together. And then I would be inclined to glue the debris onto the outside or stuff it into string bags so that I could use it later if I wanted to move the asteroid. Good idea, but this calls for another level of robotic articulation. Perhaps a fly around robot with a vacuum cleaner style of suction mechanism, pulling stuff into heavy duty plastic bags could do the trick. So there is a way round the ring problem... AAI |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tim Auton wrote in message . ..
(AA Institute) wrote: Before anybody gives me that look... Too late I wouldn't want to be on an orbital space station with some loon blowing up asteroids around the same planet. Fair comment, I wouldn't want to either! So what do *you* think would make a nice, comfy orbital colony? I mean we've tried the Salyut, Skylab, Mir, ISS... and god knows whatever else is coming next, with frankly very little in the way of establishing a permanent presence in space. Granted, these were highly *essential*, interim experience and confidence building steps. I doubt very much I would have had the confidence to put forward starship designs with biospheres and orbital engineering projects with asteroid hollowing, had it not been for these early successful steps. So, do we need a scaled up version of another ISS style station in a higher orbit around the Earth or would it be more beneficial to grab an asteroid and try a fresh approach? If the asteroid is carefully selected using prior robotic surveying, it may offer us a wealth of mineral resources as a bonus. And part of its excavation toward building a habitat would come from the mineral mining. I hear a lot of noise about "mining the sky", and how asteroid mining could become HOT property in the future. But how many of those noise-makers have the vision to say let's grab an asteroid around the Earth, where it would be infinitely easier to mine? The AA Institute is the *FIRST* science authority on this planet with the exceptional foresight, courage and boldness to put forward such confident and robust proposals!!! AAI |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Also, all these man made satellites have position keeping thrusters, to
compensate for things like the moon. I have no idea as to what would happen to this "ring" if they suddenly just turned them all off, but I don't think anything major would happen very fast. I've changed my mind about 20,000 km as a *safe* perigee height, as it will endanger geostationary satellites orbiting in a constellation at 35,700 km. If the perigee of the asteroid's orbit is 40,000 km and say the apogee is 200,000 km then that may be a safe option. If the apogee goes much above 250,000 km then there's the Moon's perturbing influence to worry about, since it orbits at around 380,000 km. Great, now all I need to do are some 'back of the cigarette packet' calcs that show the Delta-V requirements to achieve a capture. I hope no one gets too alarmed by all this... it's just some fun calculations over a fun idea, which may or may not come to fruition one day (depending if there's public support). Abdul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - August 27, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 14 | August 30th 04 11:09 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |