|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
NO leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2015
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:37:45 +0200, Paul Schlyter
wrote this crap: On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:23:20 -0400, Lord Vath wrote: I haven't mentioned most of my greatest accomplishments. You wouldn't believe me anyway. Certainly not without evidence... I certainly have evidence. You can be assured of that. Now ? know you claim you have evidence, but for some reason you don't want to present it. Why? The most plausible hypothesis is that the evidence is missing. Do you deny that? If so, just don't deny it, disprove it! If I presented it, you would probably just say it was faked. As I said above. You wouldn't believe me anyway. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
NO leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2015
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:32:03 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote: If I presented it, you would probably just say it was faked. As I said above. You wouldn't believe me anyway. ?f you pointed me to your paper(s) published in reputable peer-reviewed scientific journals, I would be unable to do so without making a fool of myself. So what are you waiting for? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
NO leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2015
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:15:59 +0200, Paul Schlyter
wrote this crap: On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:32:03 -0400, Lord Vath wrote: If I presented it, you would probably just say it was faked. As I said above. You wouldn't believe me anyway. ?f you pointed me to your paper(s) published in reputable peer-reviewed scientific journals, I would be unable to do so without making a fool of myself. So what are you waiting for? I'm not waiting for anything. I learned years ago that you never give out your real name on the internet, unless on a secure website. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
NO leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2015
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:58:54 -0400, Lord Vath
wrote: On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:15:59 +0200, Paul Schlyter wrote this crap: On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:32:03 -0400, Lord Vath wrote: If I presented it, you would probably just say it was faked. As I said above. You wouldn't believe me anyway. ?f you pointed me to your paper(s) published in reputable peer-reviewed scientific journals, I would be unable to do so without making a fool of myself. So what are you waiting for? I'm not waiting for anything. I learned years ago that you never give out your real name on the internet, unless on a secure website. Which meant you've never contributed anything to science. You're just trolling around, and you want to continue doing so, anonymously. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NO leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2014 | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | July 11th 14 04:32 PM |
NO leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2013 | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 37 | July 16th 13 05:46 AM |
Fwd: NO leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2013 | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | January 20th 13 07:40 PM |
A positive leap second will be introduced in UTC on 31 December 2005 | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 11th 05 05:23 PM |
Bulletin C 28 -- NO positive leap second will be introduced at the endof December 2004 | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 28 | July 23rd 04 07:31 PM |