A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SpaceX Dragon 2 In Flight Abort Test



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 20th 20, 01:28 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,307
Default SpaceX Dragon 2 In Flight Abort Test

In article ,
says...

On 2020-01-18 19:18, Alain Fournier wrote:

Yes. Note also that even if the Dragon capsule did experience 7g for a
few seconds, that wouldn't be a problem. Such an acceleration is a
problem if it is sustained but for a few seconds 7g is uncomfortable but
not really dangerous.


I am more concerned about a sudden change in G force. Going from 0 to
7G progressively over a matter of a couple of minutes 9eg: re-entry) is
quite different than going from 0 to 7G instantly as engines fiore.


Ejection seats have a much higher jerk and much higher G forces (up to
22 Gs for some Russian e-seats). This 4 plus G escape was very tame by
comparison.

I watched the early videos from today's launch, and it appears there was
a time delay between the call for engine shutdown and seeing the Dragon
get away. And tis was apparently an abort command sent to the stack
(which then initate engine shutdown and Dragon escape, as opposed to an
engine shutdown command that would then trigger the abort).


The Falcon9 continued in a more or less straight trajectory for quite a
while and was not thumbling uncontrollably at the time it exploded.
(aka: not a viooent course deviation that cause deviation).


Still, it looks to have been torn apart by aerodynamic forces. The
second stage was intact when it hit the ocean (and created quite the
fireball). If destruct charges would have taken it out, I would have
thought the 2nd stage would have been deliberately destroyed too.

I assume juicy videos will come out later giving more info on that part
of the test.


I am not sure we'll see much more than what was on the live-stream.

I haven't listened to the press conferences yet. Did they trigger range
safety because it hadn't broken up as quickly as expected? Or would they
have waited till Falcon9 would have been much close to sea level before
triggering it?


I've not watched that yet either.

Jeff

--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA Invites Media to SpaceX In-Flight Abort Test for Commercial Crew NASA via sci.space.tech Admin Technology 0 November 27th 19 03:54 PM
SpaceX Dragon 2 capsule destroyed in abort motor ground test Jeff Findley[_6_] Policy 59 July 12th 19 08:30 AM
[PS] Orion Completes Critical In-Flight Abort Test The Planetary Society via sci.space.science Admin Science 0 July 3rd 19 06:56 AM
SpaceX gets paid for Pad Abort test Greg \(Strider\) Moore Policy 2 June 12th 15 12:46 AM
SpaceX Dragon Capsule Splashes Down in Pacific, Ending Historic Test Flight [email protected] Policy 11 June 4th 12 02:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.