![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A satellite in a geostationary orbit is basically an extension of the Lat/Long system into space as a sat hanging over a particular longitude on the surface is much like any object at sea level or on top of a mountain, for although rotational speeds at different in terms of height, they remain rotating with the Earth.
The Earth has two distinct surface rotations so the satellites experience a drift if not corrected although engineers nor much anyone else recognises the Polar day/night cycle and its surface rotational cause as a function of the orbital motion of the Earth - "There are two other, less serious, problems with geostationary satellites. First, the exact position of a geostationary satellite, relative to the surface, varies slightly over the course of each 24-hour period because of gravitational interaction among the satellite, the earth, the sun, the moon, and the non-terrestrial planets." https://searchmobilecomputing.techta...nary-satellite It is proper to speak of an orbital pole or a point on the Earth's surface where the maximum surface rotation arising from an orbital surface rotation reaches zero . A rough guide for maximum rotational speed of the surface is the broken line in this graphic - http://afewbitsmore.com/img/2015_ecliptic.png The rotational speed parallel to the orbital plane at the maximum equatorial circumference is, on average, about 68.17 miles per day so the satellites are picking this up just as observers on the ground picked up variations in the natural noon cycle. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:04:17 -0800 (PST), Gerald Kelleher
wrote: A satellite in a geostationary orbit is basically an extension of the Lat/Long system into space as a sat hanging over a particular longitude on the surface is much like any object at sea level or on top of a mountain, for although rotational speeds at different in terms of height, they remain rotating with the Earth. All geostationary satellites are at the same latitude: 0°. That is, directly above the equator. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The same surface rotation responsible for the variations in the natural noon cycle and isolated as the Polar day/night cycle (parallel to the orbital plane), is registered by geostationary satellites as a daily drift.
Nobody should waste the information where the Equation of Time correction which creates the average 24 hour day and consequently the Lat/Long framework combines with human engineering where a satellite hanging over the same longitude meridian also registers the same surface rotation. The constant rate of daily rotation is based on the average 24 hour day as 'average' and 'constant' can be interchangeable in timekeeping and dynamical circumstances. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/11/2018 16:05, Gerald Kelleher wrote:
The same surface rotation responsible for the variations in the natural noon cycle and isolated as the Polar day/night cycle (parallel to the orbital plane), is registered by geostationary satellites as a daily drift. No. To first order they sit above one point on the Earth's equator with just a few minor purturbations mostly from the sun and the moon. You can photograph them relatively easily with time exposures and an untracked camera so that the stars trail and the faint geostationary satellites do not. The clue is in their name *GEO*stationary. Some nice time lapse images of the geostationary line of birds he https://petapixel.com/2015/10/07/geo...ky-time-lapse/ The trick to observing them is catching them at the time of year when they give optimum specular reflections of sunlight or a big scope. For once you don't need to track the stars - they drift past. https://www.calsky.com/?geosat= -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 9:03:37 PM UTC, Martin Brown wrote:
On 07/11/2018 16:05, Gerald Kelleher wrote: The same surface rotation responsible for the variations in the natural noon cycle and isolated as the Polar day/night cycle (parallel to the orbital plane), is registered by geostationary satellites as a daily drift. No. The Earth's rotation projected into space in terms of geostationary satellites which reflect longitudinal fixed position albeit at a greater height and a faster rotational speed is only one of two distinct rotations. The satellite has a forward motion through space as the Earth has so it will register the orbital surface rotations just as ringed planets display a surface rotation parallel to the orbital plane aside from and addition to daily rotation. The 4 degree orbital surface rotation of Uranus and its rings provide the observational certainty (about 50 seconds in) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=612gSZsplpE&t=58s A satellite in an orbit circling the circle of illumination will see the North and South poles turn beneath that satellite as a reflection of both the forward motion of the Earth through space and the slow and uneven rotation of the surface parallel to the orbital plane - http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/...mericas250.jpg The Equation of Time reflects the same combination of surface rotations, one rotation asserted to be constant (daily rotation) and the other uneven (orbital surface rotation. This is not a competition, if people want to follow the principles then so be it or they can call out from the shadows about imaginary perturbations. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 8:05:54 AM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote:
All geostationary satellites are at the same latitude: 0°. That is, directly above the equator. There are geosynchronous satellites with inclined orbits and a figure-eight ground track. A constellation of such satellites could possibly provide communications service to arctic or antarctic communities. John Savard |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 19:43:32 -0800 (PST), Quadibloc
wrote: On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 8:05:54 AM UTC-7, Chris L Peterson wrote: All geostationary satellites are at the same latitude: 0°. That is, directly above the equator. There are geosynchronous satellites with inclined orbits and a figure-eight ground track. A constellation of such satellites could possibly provide communications service to arctic or antarctic communities. Right. But he was talking about geostationary satellites- a special case of geosynchronous satellites that are necessarily at an inclination of zero. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geostationary satellites hang above a longitude meridian and orbit the Earth at the same rate as the planet turns in the direction of daily rotation. It stands to reason that the orbit of the satellite is basically an extension of the Lat/Long system into space so the Equatorial speed at sea level will be 1037.5 miles per hour and once 24901 mile rotation in 24.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzhVK09YReA The central reference of the satellite is the Earth in front of it so although it will not pick up the surface rotation of the North South poles parallel to the orbital plane, it may catch the edge of the Antarctic Continent move annually. It should have alerted people to the fact that we see the same thing when the Sun is a central reference as both rotations combine to create the variations in the natural noon cycle. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASTRO: Geostationary satellites and Arp 146 | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 1 | May 24th 09 08:48 PM |
ASTRO: Three Geostationary Satellites in 9 seconds | Rick Johnson[_2_] | Astro Pictures | 2 | February 18th 09 07:18 PM |
How to calculate eclipse for geostationary satellites ? | HJK | UK Astronomy | 3 | October 10th 06 03:31 PM |
How to calculate eclipse for geostationary satellites ? | HJK | Misc | 0 | September 30th 06 07:49 PM |
geostationary satellites | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | April 25th 06 10:26 PM |