What if (On Sirius)

What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? I think so. Why is it called
the "Dog Star? TreBert

On Nov 27, 6:37*am, bert wrote:
What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

White is the all-inclusive color of most anything that's surrounded by
absolute black, such as stars being surrounded by nothing we can see
with the naked eye.

However, Sirius(A) is actually offering a bluish-white color/hue
because it's burning at such greater temperature. Sirius(B) was
originally worth at least 8.5 up to 9.5 Ms, and when combined along
with those extremely bluish-white photons from the 3+ Ms of that
original Sirius(A) should have been an extremely vibrant source of UV,
X-rays and gamma for us, while Sirius(B) was originally downright
extreme by likely many times as bright as our moonlight, except nearly
all UV and higher spectrum that we humans can’t see, but diatoms can
directly benefit from such extreme spectrums of light.

The many names for Sirius, including "Dog star", is just from the
history of what others named such things, usually having something to
do with one of their many gods or something else they admired or
thought represented as a depiction. A basic internet search covers
everything anyone really needs to know about such names.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius

There could also have once been a Sirius(C), and Sirius(B) lost all
of its planets.

~ BG

"bert" wrote in message
...
What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? I think so. Why is it called
the "Dog Star? TreBert

It's called the "Dog Star" because it reminds people of Hillary Clinton.

On Nov 27, 8:37*am, bert wrote:
What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

Sirius is only 8.6 light years away?
We ought to go there and find out these things for ourselves.
Only take about a month with modern technology.
As soon as the scientists are ready and brave enough to learn facts
instead of theory.

On Nov 27, 8:18*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Nov 27, 8:37*am, bert wrote:

What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

Sirius is only *8.6 light years away?
We ought to go there and find out these things for ourselves.
Only take about a month with modern technology.
As soon as the scientists are ready and brave enough to learn facts
instead of theory.

More likely it'll take 17 years with a probe velocity of 0.5 c.

~ BG

On Nov 27, 11:32*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 27, 8:18*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:37*am, bert wrote:

What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

Sirius is only *8.6 light years away?
We ought to go there and find out these things for ourselves.
Only take about a month with modern technology.
As soon as the scientists are ready and brave enough to learn facts
instead of theory.

More likely it'll take 17 years with a probe velocity of 0.5 c.

*~ BG

c is only theory. No one knows,

On Nov 27, 10:29*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Nov 27, 11:32*pm, Brad Guth wrote:



On Nov 27, 8:18*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:37*am, bert wrote:

What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1..7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

Sirius is only *8.6 light years away?
We ought to go there and find out these things for ourselves.
Only take about a month with modern technology.
As soon as the scientists are ready and brave enough to learn facts
instead of theory.

More likely it'll take 17 years with a probe velocity of 0.5 c.

*~ BG

c is only theory. *No one knows,

0.5 c is sufficiently lethal radiation from every particle the ships
runs into.

Humans are not rad-hard.

~ BG

On Nov 28, 12:49*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 27, 10:29*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:





On Nov 27, 11:32*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:18*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:37*am, bert wrote:

What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

Sirius is only *8.6 light years away?
We ought to go there and find out these things for ourselves.
Only take about a month with modern technology.
As soon as the scientists are ready and brave enough to learn facts
instead of theory.

More likely it'll take 17 years with a probe velocity of 0.5 c.

*~ BG

c is only theory. *No one knows,

0.5 c is sufficiently lethal radiation from every particle the ships
runs into.

Humans are not rad-hard.

*~ BG- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

c is nothing but thoughts about light.
We can easily side step that one.
Look at how fast our line of sight travels
to those stars.

On 11/27/2010 10:55 PM, Mark Earnest wrote:


c is only theory. No one knows,

0.5 c is sufficiently lethal radiation from every particle the ships
runs into.

Humans are not rad-hard.

~ BG- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

c is nothing but thoughts about light.
We can easily side step that one.
Look at how fast our line of sight travels
to those stars.


What a tard......

On Nov 27, 10:55*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Nov 28, 12:49*am, Brad Guth wrote:



On Nov 27, 10:29*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:

On Nov 27, 11:32*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:18*pm, Mark Earnest wrote:

On Nov 27, 8:37*am, bert wrote:

What if Sirius is so bright because its a double star. Next reason its
only 8.6 LY away. Next reason its color is white. Next reason its 1.7
time bigger than the Sun. This question just came to mind. Do all main
sequence stars shine with color white? *I think so. *Why is it called
the "Dog Star? * *TreBert

Sirius is only *8.6 light years away?
We ought to go there and find out these things for ourselves.
Only take about a month with modern technology.
As soon as the scientists are ready and brave enough to learn facts
instead of theory.

More likely it'll take 17 years with a probe velocity of 0.5 c.

*~ BG

c is only theory. *No one knows,

0.5 c is sufficiently lethal radiation from every particle the ships
runs into.

Humans are not rad-hard.

*~ BG- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

c is nothing but thoughts about light.
We can easily side step that one.
Look at how fast our line of sight travels
to those stars.

Considering the all-inclusive directions that photons of the entire
spectrum must travel away from their origin, and the trillions of
atoms aligned directly in their path, whereas it seems amazing that we
get to see hardly anything of whatever's actually out there.

There should easily be 1e184 photons existing by now, plus at least
another 3.154e94 more created per year. Meanwhile, we have to make do
with fewer and fewer atoms. Interesting how many quantum 2D string
like photons there are, and I do believe I'm being conservative.

~ BG