|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What If (Stars,and Galaxies)
Stars have all the elements inside them.,and that means the nebula has
these 92 elements incorporated in them. I'm posting my thoughts that "clumping" of stars,and galaxies are a big mystery. Has anyone studied how galaxies formed? Is the big clue in galaxy clumping stars the fact that they have a BH in their center? Does it take a black hole to clump a nebula,so that it does not dilute into cold empty space? When we find all that missing dark matter will it help answer this question? I came up with vortexes in the nebula to create areas in the cloud where stars would form. Reality is I'm using a swirling motion to help gravity to compress. It fits well with my "Spin is in theory" Bert PS All galaxies have to be created flat.when young. Round galaxies got their shape by merging with flat galaxies. That makes good sense. Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What If (Stars,and Galaxies)
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Stars have all the elements inside them.,and that means the nebula has these 92 elements incorporated in them. I'm posting my thoughts that "clumping" of stars,and galaxies are a big mystery. Has anyone studied how galaxies formed? Is the big clue in galaxy clumping stars the fact that they have a BH in their center? Does it take a black hole to clump a nebula,so that it does not dilute into cold empty space? When we find all that missing dark matter will it help answer this question? I came up with vortexes in the nebula to create areas in the cloud where stars would form. Reality is I'm using a swirling motion to help gravity to compress. It fits well with my "Spin is in theory" Bert PS All galaxies have to be created flat.when young. Round galaxies got their shape by merging with flat galaxies. That makes good sense. Bert Images from HST seem to support the idea that galaxies formed from the merger of clouds of gas and stars. Unfortunately, the observations I have seen were at the edge of resolution of HST. The Webb telescope may show the way. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What If (Stars,and Galaxies)
Scott I read the universe at this spacetime was at least 150 billion
trillion miles across. That is a lot of room to house all those galaxies in it. The Hubble in 2003 has picked up faint images that are new forming galaxies(less than a billion years old) In 2005 when the Hubble using infarred and optical cameras it found very old galaxies seeing them as they were about 12.7 billion years ago. These old galaxies must be gone by now,but its nice to know they are being replaced. The new replacing the old is another balancing act by mother nature. bert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What If (Stars,and Galaxies)
Scott We will know when we find the oldest galaxy. Its stars will not
contain heavy elements bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Relative sizes / distances between stars and galaxies | Boo | UK Astronomy | 5 | January 4th 07 06:51 AM |
Universe: Galaxies, Stars, Planets.. or Just Earth? | Jeet | Space Station | 4 | February 4th 06 09:33 PM |
Universe: Galaxies, Stars, Planets.. or Just Earth? | Jeet | Policy | 4 | February 4th 06 09:33 PM |
Universe: Galaxies, Stars, Planets.. or Just Earth? | Jeet | History | 4 | February 4th 06 09:33 PM |
since we're looking at the past when looking at the stars and galaxies..... | Matt Dillon | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | April 3rd 05 02:41 PM |