Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.

On Mar 21, 11:36*am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Mar 21, 6:33*am, NoEinstein wrote:

On Mar 20, 1:05*am, Eric Gisse wrote:

Dear Eric: *You—from a long line of Jewish MORONS, like Einstein—
aren't willing to admit that you don't know what-the-hell kinetic
energy is, and that such certainly isn't defined by: KE = 1/2mv^2.
The big shame for the world is that those like you, Sam and PD are
deliberately working to deny me respect in the science community for
having figured out how the Universe ACTUALLY works.

Bozo the clown is upset that people are laughing at him and not giving
him respect.

[...]

Eric: You a little guy like you, stuck in Alaska or someplace, I find
it amazing that you can read the minds of the tens of thousands who
read my posts per year. Apparently, there weren't a great number of
interested readers to appease your wounded ego on those light science
blogs that you have deserted in favor of sci.physics. Remember, Eric,
you have yet to present your air-hockey, KE experiment that upholds KE
= 1/2 mv^2. Of course, you can't do that. Shame, such a laughing
shame! — NoEinstein —

On Mar 21, 1:10*pm, rasterspace wrote:
so, why do you think that I should believe you,
when yo haven't proven that Liebniz was wrong
about KE=mvv?

(or, that Galileo was correct, and KE=mv?)

when I say proof, it's got to be "necessity and
sufficiency" for such a result to *be able* to hold
to the real world, not necessarily just,
your [dimensional analysis of a God-am formula --
that would be just plain silly, as
in "syllogistical."

otherwise, your just wasting your time on sci.math,
because that is a standard that goes back,
way before Euclid and Aristotle.

rasterspace: You haven't proved anything, except that you are a likely
drunk. — NE —

On Mar 21, 11:11*pm, rasterspace wrote:
yeah, bluer light has more energy per unit time,
than redder light; there's a formula, out there, but
I only give change for pi-dollar bills ...
I collect'em.

Thanks for agreeing. Do more of that, and stop wasting my time! —
NE —

On Mar 21, 11:13*pm, rasterspace wrote:
you're only half-assed literate,
to be able to only partially assess any questions
that are asked of you, in English.

check-out Korbyzinski's old joke-language,
E-prime.

rasterspace: I SCAN, not read, your usual nonsense. Getting you, a
drunk, to agree with my New Science isn't very high on my agenda! —
NE —

On Mar 22, 5:26*pm, neinstein scribbled with his second best, yellow
crayon:
Every time you defend Einstein's errant status quo, you are hurting my
chances of getting funded in time to make the contributions that the
world so needs.

You couldn't get funding as a part time clown in a kindergarten.

If you have some other talent than self praise I'd start busking now.

On Mar 22, 9:35*am, NoEinstein wrote:
On Mar 21, 11:36*am, Eric Gisse wrote:

On Mar 21, 6:33*am, NoEinstein wrote:

On Mar 20, 1:05*am, Eric Gisse wrote:

Dear Eric: *You—from a long line of Jewish MORONS, like Einstein—
aren't willing to admit that you don't know what-the-hell kinetic
energy is, and that such certainly isn't defined by: KE = 1/2mv^2.
The big shame for the world is that those like you, Sam and PD are
deliberately working to deny me respect in the science community for
having figured out how the Universe ACTUALLY works.

Bozo the clown is upset that people are laughing at him and not giving
him respect.

[...]

Eric: *You a little guy like you, stuck in Alaska or someplace, I find
it amazing that you can read the minds of the tens of thousands who
read my posts per year.

Bozo the clown had a big audience too.

*Apparently, there weren't a great number of
interested readers to appease your wounded ego on those light science
blogs that you have deserted in favor of sci.physics.

You mean the blogs of actual working physicists as opposed to, say,
you?

*Remember, Eric,
you have yet to present your air-hockey, KE experiment that upholds KE
= 1/2 mv^2. *Of course, you can't do that. *Shame, such a laughing
shame! *— *NoEinstein —

YAAWWWWWWWN

http://physics.princeton.edu/~mcdona...anual_2009.pdf
http://mail.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/~physd...ull_manual.pdf

This is, of course, in addition to the two OTHER lab manuals I have
given you previously.

On Mar 22, 11:26*am, NoEinstein wrote:
On Mar 21, 10:35*am, PD wrote:

Eric:

Lose track of who you were talking to? No wonder your ideas never get
off the ground.

*Your level of science experimentation involves putting glass
objects into a microwave and (somehow) shattering those all over your
bedroom. *Product development can cost millions of dollars. *I have
the concepts for new technology, but NOT the time nor the money!
Every time you defend Einstein's errant status quo, you are hurting my
chances of getting funded in time to make the contributions that the
world so needs. *You are a FAILURE at science, Eric. *Don't use your
hurt ego and your Jewish racism to hurt the rest of the world. *—
NoEinstein —



On Mar 19, 10:21*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Mar 18, 5:08*pm, Eric Gisse wrote:

Eric: *Every time you, Dunce 3, keep me replying to your sidesteps of
science reason, I have less time to devote to improving the world.
When Einstein gets kicked from his fraudulent genius status, it's
likely I'll start getting the financial backing to do productive
product development.

Explain why the status of Einstein has *anything* to do with your
product development timeline.

*My fusion reactor will fit on two or three
railway cars, and can be safely parked in every community. *By doing
that, 75% of the expense of the power grid can be eliminated. *And a
"down" reactor can be replaced with a new one over night. *What have
YOU done for science, Eric? *Ha, ha, HA! *— NoEinstein —

On Mar 18, 1:57*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

On Mar 17, 11:13*pm, palsing wrote:

On Mar 17, 6:23*pm, NoEinstein wrote:

Fission uses gamma rays to cut the bonds holding dense
nuclei together. *That yields particles of less total mass with the
difference being made up of energy. *

This is not universally true. Fission only releases energy for
elements heavier than about iron. For elements lighter than about iron
you need to add energy to split them apart.

Fusion combines nuclei in a more
efficient (to contain) way, so that the now unneeded containment
energy is release for destructive or constructive purposes...

Conversely, this also is not universally true. Fusion only releases
energy for elements lighter than about iron. For elements heavier than
about iron you need to add energy in order to fuse them.

\Paul A

Dear Paul A: *Thanks for the expertise! *I have a "concept" for a
workable fusion reactor that shouldn't have residual radiation
problems, because the entire containment vessel is made of Pyrex
glass, not metal. *I'm a generalist who has avoided becoming too
focused on one area of science. *If my single-laser-initiated fusion
works, it will solve the world's energy problems, improve prosperity,
and keep things peaceful. *Stay positive, people! *— NoEinstein —

Neat. The guy who can't figure out a high school physics experiment
thinks he's figured out fusion.

On Mar 22, 9:26*am, NoEinstein wrote:
On Mar 21, 10:35*am, PD wrote:

Eric: *

I see reading isn't one of your strong suites.

Your level of science experimentation involves putting glass
objects into a microwave and (somehow) shattering those all over your
bedroom.

That was for giggles.

The microwave died an honorable death, and I honor its' memory by
keeping the focusing magnets from its' magnetron.

*Product development can cost millions of dollars. *I have
the concepts for new technology, but NOT the time nor the money!

You have plenty of time.

Exhibit A: USENET
Exhibit B: Retirement

Every time you defend Einstein's errant status quo, you are hurting my
chances of getting funded in time to make the contributions that the
world so needs.

What does Einstein have to do with anything here?

*You are a FAILURE at science, Eric. Don't use your
hurt ego and your Jewish racism to hurt the rest of the world. *—
NoEinstein —

What do Jews have to do with anything here?

[...]

yeah, I'm sure that you think that you've snowed
all of your friends, at least when they're drinking,
with your hyperlight sitcomedy.

I didn't agree with you on this!