A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA Awards Launch Services Contract For OCO-2 Mission



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 23rd 10, 12:34 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default NASA Awards Launch Services Contract For OCO-2 Mission

wrote:
CONTRACT RELEASE: C10-036


NASA AWARDS LAUNCH SERVICES CONTRACT FOR OCO-2 MISSION


CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -- NASA has selected Orbital Sciences Corp. of
Dulles, Va., to launch the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2)
mission. The spacecraft will fly in February 2013 aboard a Taurus XL
3110 rocket launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
The total cost of the OCO-2 launch services is approximately $70
million.


The estimated cost includes the task ordered launch service for a
Taurus XL 3110 rocket, plus additional services under other
contracts for payload processing, OCO-2 mission unique support,
launch vehicle integration, and tracking, data and telemetry
support.


Any bets as to whether this one will go any better than the last? I
suppose that as the "incumbent" Orbital had the inside track on OCO-2,
even though they botched the launch of OCO-1 but still, $70 million?
Particularly if this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurus_XL

and the assertion that the failed launch for OCO-1 was $54 million is
accurate.

rick jones
--
oxymoron n, commuter in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV with an American flag
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #2  
Old June 23rd 10, 02:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Brian Thorn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,266
Default NASA Awards Launch Services Contract For OCO-2 Mission

On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:34:42 +0000 (UTC), Rick Jones
wrote:

Any bets as to whether this one will go any better than the last? I
suppose that as the "incumbent" Orbital had the inside track on OCO-2,
even though they botched the launch of OCO-1 but still, $70 million?
Particularly if this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurus_XL

and the assertion that the failed launch for OCO-1 was $54 million is
accurate.


$54 million is probably just the rocket. The launch services contract
is more than just the rocket (payload preparation too, among other
things.)

Brian
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA Awards Wackenhut Agency-Wide Protective Services Contract ron News 0 June 24th 09 11:36 PM
NASA Awards Hydrospheric and Biospheric Science Services Contract ron News 0 June 16th 09 12:20 AM
NASA Awards Contract for Microgravity Aircraft Services Jeff Findley Policy 0 January 3rd 08 02:24 PM
NASA Awards Alabama Environmental Engineering Services Contract Jacques van Oene News 0 December 3rd 05 10:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.