Newfound asteroid will pass by Earth at lunar distance Thursday

OBSERVATIONS: Newfound asteroid will pass by Earth at lunar distance
Thursday
The newfound visitor is the brightest asteroid, and consequently among
the largest, to draw so near in the past year
http://cl.exct.net/?qs=cdda37bcd59b2...69f64f35106117

On Apr 9, 1:48*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
OBSERVATIONS: Newfound asteroid will pass by Earth at lunar distance
Thursday
The newfound visitor is the brightest asteroid, and consequently among
the largest, to draw so near in the past yearhttp://cl.exct.net/?qs=cdda37bcd59b2c5379370a67be4e7ebdcf944eada2e532 ...

How bright will it be at maximum?

Sam Wormley:
....
http://cl.exct.net/?qs=cdda37bcd59b2...69f64f35106117

That link didn't work for me. Why such a convoluted URL when you could
just post http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/ or
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/neo20100406.html or
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/?

Davoud

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

On 4/9/2010 5:37 PM, Davoud wrote:
Sam Wormley:
....
http://cl.exct.net/?qs=cdda37bcd59b2...69f64f35106117

That link didn't work for me. Why such a convoluted URL when you could
just post http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/ or
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/neo20100406.html or
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/?

Senile Sam makes money everytime someone links through exct.net.

What would you expect from someone who adores Oriel?

On 4/9/10 12:48 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
Newfound asteroid will pass by Earth at lunar distance Thursday

Better Link
http://www.scientificamerican.com/bl...art-2010-04-08

On Apr 10, 5:41*am, Thad Floryan wrote:
On 4/9/2010 5:37 PM, Davoud wrote:

Sam Wormley:
....
http://cl.exct.net/?qs=cdda37bcd59b2...cf944eada2e532....

That link didn't work for me. Why such a convoluted URL when you could
just post http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/observations/ or
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/neo20100406.html or
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch/?

Senile Sam makes money everytime someone links through exct.net.

What would you expect from someone who adores Oriel?

I don't see any difference between your tactics and that of the guy
who has latched on to Martin Howell and Starlord and it preys on non-
conformity,the sly remarks in Sam's direction is just simply childish
bullying tactics and it looks like it has been effective in Sam's
case,it means that if you pop your head up in an astronomical matter,I
will chop it off but that means nothing to me,setting an astronomical
standard that does not exist is my business and part of that means
that fools have no longer the ground to operate on leaving them
nothing but boasting about 'killfiles' and what have you.

All the talk of extraterrestrials,no center/no circumference
ideologies and dark this and dark cannot conceal the mass denial of
basic planetary facts and characteristics in order to adore a late
17th century tyrant who had a particular modelling/predictions agenda
to promote,something that recently almost destroyed Western
civilization whether it was financial modelling,climate
modelling ,astronomical modelling or anything based on highly
speculative assumptions.I mean to stop it,not by showing you how dumb
you actually are but taking the much harder but satisfying course of
using the very images derived from magnification to put the methods
and insights of the great astronomers back in focus.

Sam has got the message but because of his attempt to stand apart
from unresponsive people,he will always have the choice of looking at
the proof for rotation once in 24 hours by using cause and effect of
twilight variations and the latitudinal speeds attached.

On Apr 10, 12:46*am, oriel36 wrote:
recently almost destroyed Western
civilization

I must have missed that.

John Savard

On 4/10/10 1:46 AM, oriel36 wrote:
Sam has got the message but because of his attempt to stand apart
from unresponsive people,he will always have the choice of looking at
the proof for rotation once in 24 hours by using cause and effect of
twilight variations and the latitudinal speeds attached.


A gyro will show a rotation of about 361° in 24 hours. Gerald, you
may have to conclude that gyros have been corrupted by Newtonian
ideals and Flamsteed's pioneering entries in the Historia Coelestis
Britannica of 1712 and 1725.