Richard Cook on the American Meltdown

"American" wrote Much emotion but no content.


"American" wrote
no reaction

I have no reaction to nothingness.

"American" wrote Still nothing.

On May 4, 6:58*pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"American" wrote Still nothing.

________________ _______________
/ \ / / \ \
/ / \ \ \ | - - \
| | | / - \ |
/ / \ \
| ___\ \| | / / \____________ \
\
| / | | \
|
| | __ | | \
\
/ | \ | | \
|
| | \ | | ==== |
|
| | __ | | (o-) _ |
|
| __\ (_o) | / \ |
|
| | | Heh Heh Heh / ) ) |
|
\ || \ / Huh Huh Huh / ) / |
|
| |__ \ / \ |___ - |
|
| | (*___\ / \ *' |
|
| | _ | / \ |____ |
|
| | //_______| ####\ |
|
| / |_|_|_|___/\ ------ |
_/
\| \ - | | |
| _----_______/ \_____ |
| / \ |
|_____/

Two of Contemporary AmeriKKKa's intellectual hero's.

On May 4, 8:23*pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
Two of Contemporary AmeriKKKa's intellectual hero's.

...There's your huckleberry

-

"American" wrote
There's your huckleberry

Content free. As always.

On May 4, 11:57*pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote:
"American" wrote

There's your huckleberry

* Content free. *As always.

Are you a parrot?

Or do you scud memos like vomit?

-

On May 5, 10:25*am, American wrote:
On May 4, 11:57*pm, "V-for-Vendicar"

wrote:
"American" wrote

There's your huckleberry

* Content free. *As always.

Are you a parrot?

Or do you scud memos like vomit?

-

Creative science cannot do without obsessive "gadgeteering". I'm
looking at the tendency of administrations to "shut out" certain
creative engineering with procedural practices. The "tools" for
implementation that a government needs must at first be forseeable in
the short term, as it has been mostly the "short term" that aid to
civilians in the private sector will be made in the form of tax
rebates, incentives, personal loans, and grants. These are the
extensions of "seed markets" that should best help to improve the
welfare of most or all mankind in terms of the development of
benefiting off-planet resource development.

A correct placing of civil servants into a highly organized structure
would bring in a good many questions of academic status. There would
have to be the power of inspection of mining facilities and follow-up
in licensing those facilities for production. If a government does not
have these powers of action, and only gets "advice" from private
enterprise, and never makes routine "checks" at the point of action,
then government(s) of this type will be useless "pork", and will
inevitably fade away into "happenstance" activities.

Military objectives in these areas have been quite successful, since
they tend to be a lot more precise in their outcomes, as opposed to
"benevolent" objectives. It is a fable that today, science can
flourish in the "free air". The evidence today is that only medical
and military science are able to accelerate technology into action at
a much quicker pace than non-military science.

Medical research in the United States seems to operate at a higher
level than military research, if efficiency is a virtue. Medical
research, as a government organ, acts not as a controlling force, but
as an impresario to the needs of more aging Americans than this
country has ever before witnessed. For certain people who can afford
the price, a serum can be developed that can enhance their overall
longevity into the hundreds of years! But an awful lot of life doesn't
consist either of trying to accelerate people's deaths or alternately
to delay them - unless a benevolent research of some sort can get
started that could act as a "springboard" for further investigation by
private enterprise.

The status of a "gadgeteer" scientist today has been eclipsed by
statesmen. Certain of these people wish no benevolence on "gadgeteers"
other than keeping them in their "place" as invalidated and over-
monitored pawns of high-powered lawyers and politicians. The danger in
all this is that there is a particular group of these people that have
been the LARGER WITNESS TO A COMPLETELY SHRUGGED OFF SENSE OF FUTURE
FOR THE MAJORITY OF HUMANITY. THEY ALONE HAVE FOSTERED THE EXISTENTIAL
SOCIETY, IN THE SAME WORLD AS THE GADGETEERED, FUTURE-DIRECTED
SOCIETY! This is the nature of the double-speak that politics has
found itself RIFE with. The problem here is that scientists should be
active in ALL LEVELS of government, not just in just within the
incidental offices of legalistic paper-shufflers or media spin-
machines.

I has definitely become the prevailing attitude that scientists (i.e.,
gadgeteers) have something to give an existential society suffering
from "hope starvation", and that is foresight. It is the property of
this foresight that the subject is moving in time - the same way that
our institutions of higher learning should be geared - and not with
the art of some youthful and care-free administration prone to
innuendo and media rhetoric.

American

On Apr 30, 7:53 pm, kT wrote:
Richard Cook on the American Meltdown

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=8854

This certainly puts VSE, ESAS, Constellation, Ares and Orion into a
much better perspective. Nothing else makes any sense, nobody in their
right mind would propose this crap as a viable space program.

Ever take notice as to how the topic creator "kT" has never once
returned to his/her own topic.

Isn't this a wee bit spook/mole worthy?
.. - Brad Guth

On May 5, 6:02*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 30, 7:53 pm, kT wrote:

Richard Cook on the American Meltdown

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...xt=va&aid=8854

This certainly puts VSE, ESAS, Constellation, Ares and Orion into a
much better perspective. Nothing else makes any sense, nobody in their
right mind would propose this crap as a viable space program.

Ever take notice as to how the topic creator "kT" has never once
returned to his/her own topic.

Isn't this a wee bit spook/mole worthy?
. - Brad Guth

That is a trick question. I can't really say that there would
necessarily "be" a spook/mole worthiness on his part, since he (KT)
was the one who pointed the topic of "Richard Cook on the American
Meltdown" out in the first place. IMO it's rare these days that
someone in the very center or "eye of the storm" gets to examine the
thoughts and intentions of people (esp. Wall Street) who have become
immersed in their own system of usury, at the expense of those who
would believe the lies being perpetrated by those interested in
controlling the markets, i.e. Warren Buffet in the silvers market
scandal, or the Fed continuing to encourage credit growth at the
expense of mortgage industry takeovers by insolvent lending
institutions (Bear Stearns).

What we've been witnesing is the decline of American capitalism, at
the behest of the rise of global markets, all being accomplished for
the NWO's purpose of world market control, instead of free market
prosperity. IMO, it could be a giant sucker punch to those that get
too close to those that have the power to print money in ever-more-
crucial times of actually controlling who the victims to this giant
ruse/sting might be - perhaps the devil in disguise?

Thus there are methodologies being employed here that most don't
always seem to understand but will always attempt to put the blame, as
long as they get to "feel" like they were actively involved.

American