|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"thanatos" wrote in message ... thanks for the replies! geo suveys are done by big vibrators, and phased arrays of geophones perhaps could use "flags" on poles tuned to vibrate in martian winds As far as proposals go; to whom do I propose? No one yet has commented on the idea of nuking Mars for siesmic responses. Face it, the whole planet has been nuked by space rocks over eternity...whats one more?? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
No one yet has commented on the idea of nuking Mars for siesmic responses. Face it, the whole planet has been nuked by space rocks over eternity...whats one more?? With little atmosphere the surface of Mars gets hit plenty for seismic work. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Mike wrote:
"thanatos" wrote in message ... thanks for the replies! geo suveys are done by big vibrators, and phased arrays of geophones perhaps could use "flags" on poles tuned to vibrate in martian winds As far as proposals go; to whom do I propose? No one yet has commented on the idea of nuking Mars for siesmic responses. Face it, the whole planet has been nuked by space rocks over eternity...whats one more?? To get decent coupling you would need to make it a ground burst and that entails a lot of radioactive fallout. To say nothing of how the tree huggers and neighbours of the launch site would object to frivolous use of nukes. The US hawks once wanted to nuke the moon at the height of the cold war to scare the godless commies. Fortunately wiser heads prevailed. In practice landing something on Mars at orbital speed with the deceleration computed in foot/pounds but delivered in Newtons should be more than good enough to set it ringing. NASA subcontractors have an unfortunate track record in that regard. Current guestimates seem to reckon it is a couple of orders of magnitude more geologically active than the moon so there should be plenty for a decent sensitive siesmograph to see without using to artificial excitation. ISTR Apollo on leaving the moon at least one of the LEMs was droppped on a collision course to provide an impulse for the seismic sensors. Regards, Martin Brown |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My bad, it WAS Viking Lander 1's seismometer that failed to work (because it failed to deploy). -Tim. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Martian Meteorite Found in Algeria: NWA 3171 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 20th 04 10:07 PM |
New Martian Meteorite Found In Antarctica (MIL 03346) | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 20th 04 05:13 PM |
A Martian Calendar? | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 2nd 04 11:04 PM |
ESA's Martian weather report (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 15th 04 05:10 PM |
Cornell Scientists Develop Method for Using Rover Wheels to Study Martian Soil by Digging Holes | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 19th 03 09:38 PM |