|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Have you seen this new 4" telescope prototype?
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:43:19 AM UTC-4, Borkum Riff wrote:
Apologies if you already have seen this. http://unistellaroptics.com/en/product Has anyone taken part in the demos they've done? Price ? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Have you seen this new 4" telescope prototype?
On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 8:40:17 PM UTC-5, Andre wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:43:19 AM UTC-4, Borkum Riff wrote: Apologies if you already have seen this. http://unistellaroptics.com/en/product Has anyone taken part in the demos they've done? Price ? Who cares. I was once at a public star party and had a 10" scope pointed at the Andromeda Galaxy with a wide field eyepiece. A lot of people were in line looking at our neighbor galaxy which did show up nicely. One person pulled out his Android (or maybe it was another brand) cell phone, held the lens up to the eyepiece and took a snapshot. Incredibly it recorded the darned galaxy, and you could see structure in it. I would imagine that a bright youngster could hack into one of these phones, change the exposure to something like 60 seconds or more and go galaxy hunting with nothing more than a $300 Dob. Razzy. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Have you seen this new 4" telescope prototype?
On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 10:12:22 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:43:17 -0700 (PDT), Borkum Riff wrote: Apologies if you already have seen this. http://unistellaroptics.com/en/product Has anyone taken part in the demos they've done? Well, it's interesting, but I don't know that this is the best approach. They don't say anything about the technology, but my initial assumption would be that they use a low noise sensor (zero readout noise, as we see increasingly used in night vision technology) and a display of some sort in the eyepiece. If you're going to do that, why have an eyepiece at all. It's an imaging device, and an external viewer and storage system makes much more sense. EVFs (electronic viewfinders) are currently superior to LCD and OLED displays of moderate size for resolution, illumination, etc. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Have you seen this new 4" telescope prototype?
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote: On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 10:12:22 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:43:17 -0700 (PDT), Borkum Riff wrote: Apologies if you already have seen this. http://unistellaroptics.com/en/product Has anyone taken part in the demos they've done? Well, it's interesting, but I don't know that this is the best approach. They don't say anything about the technology, but my initial assumption would be that they use a low noise sensor (zero readout noise, as we see increasingly used in night vision technology) and a display of some sort in the eyepiece. If you're going to do that, why have an eyepiece at all. It's an imaging device, and an external viewer and storage system makes much more sense. EVFs (electronic viewfinders) are currently superior to LCD and OLED displays of moderate size for resolution, illumination, etc. I haven't seen any electronic viewfinders that have the resolution of a good LCD or OLED display. All the ones I've seen (mostly Sony) you can see the pixels, which you can't on good phone screens and high resolution monitors. In any case, there is resolution and there is pixel count. What would matter on a self contained system is that the sensor be matched to the display. No reason to have more resolution than the sensor. If they're using some sort of EMCCD technology as I speculate (which would be an original addition to commercial amateur imaging), the pixel count will likely be low- a few hundred by a few hundred. Quite suitable for typical small displays. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Have you seen this new 4" telescope prototype?
Razzmatazz wrote:
On Thursday, September 21, 2017 at 8:40:17 PM UTC-5, Andre wrote: On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 8:43:19 AM UTC-4, Borkum Riff wrote: Apologies if you already have seen this. http://unistellaroptics.com/en/product Has anyone taken part in the demos they've done? Price ? Who cares. I was once at a public star party and had a 10" scope pointed at the Andromeda Galaxy with a wide field eyepiece. A lot of people were in line looking at our neighbor galaxy which did show up nicely. One person pulled out his Android (or maybe it was another brand) cell phone, held the lens up to the eyepiece and took a snapshot. Incredibly it recorded the darned galaxy, and you could see structure in it. I would imagine that a bright youngster could hack into one of these phones, change the exposure to something like 60 seconds or more and go galaxy hunting with nothing more than a $300 Dob. Razzy. You don't need to hack There are plenty of apps for that. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Have you seen this new 4" telescope prototype?
On Friday, 22 September 2017 23:29:45 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote: On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 10:12:22 UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:43:17 -0700 (PDT), Borkum Riff wrote: Apologies if you already have seen this. http://unistellaroptics.com/en/product Has anyone taken part in the demos they've done? Well, it's interesting, but I don't know that this is the best approach. They don't say anything about the technology, but my initial assumption would be that they use a low noise sensor (zero readout noise, as we see increasingly used in night vision technology) and a display of some sort in the eyepiece. If you're going to do that, why have an eyepiece at all. It's an imaging device, and an external viewer and storage system makes much more sense. EVFs (electronic viewfinders) are currently superior to LCD and OLED displays of moderate size for resolution, illumination, etc. I haven't seen any electronic viewfinders that have the resolution of a good LCD or OLED display. All the ones I've seen (mostly Sony) you can see the pixels, which you can't on good phone screens and high resolution monitors. EVFs are meant to show a "virtual" image much larger than a phone screen or tablet. So it's possible pixels would be visible, though perhaps not in the highest resolution units (Leica). I figured they'd be using an EMCCD or something as well, but that telescope looks a bit plasticky and cheap to have one of those in it. We'll see. Maybe. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Advice sought for setting up a Mead model 300 "equatorialrefractor" telescope | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | June 14th 13 01:06 PM |
Advice sought for setting up a Mead model 300 "equatorial refractor" telescope | Odysseus[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | June 13th 13 11:39 AM |
ISRO to launch Astrosat (India's "Hubble" telescope) in 2009 | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | September 1st 08 10:28 AM |
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope Gets "Spacewired" (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 12th 07 06:54 PM |
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope Gets "Spacewired" (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | November 12th 07 05:52 PM |