SMITHSONIAN MAY HAVE TO RETURN ALL OF ITS FEDERAL FUNDING

Smithsonian may have to give back all of its federal funding
1 post by 1 author
me (Congress ****ed change)
10:49 AM (less than a minute ago)
GUILTY OF A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/in.../quotesnew.gif

HUMAN CRANIUM EMBEDDED IN A BOULDER

(DISCOVERED BETWEEN ANTHRACITE COAL VEINS)

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/skulla.jpg

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/skullb.jpg

http://www.edconrad.com/pics/SkullBoulderSide.jpg

=======================

HOW INNOCENTLY IT HAD ALL BEGUN

In June of 1981, Ed Conrad discovered what appeared to
be the petrified skull of a large land animal between
coal veins.

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/in...data/first.jpg

He sent a photo to the Smithsonian and was extended an
invitation to bring it in to be examined.

This was done but three of the Smithsonian's so-called
experts -- after only a few minutes -- unanimously declared
it to be a concretion, a strangely-shaped rock -- WITHOUT
DOING ANY TESTING WHATSOEVER.

Ed accepted their "expert" opinion.

However, a few months later, he discovered another skull-like
object embedded in a boulder at the same location which
bore a dramatic resemblance to the side view of a human
cranium (based on comparative anatomy).

He sent color photos to the Smithsonian, with this response.

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr072782.gif

http://www.edconrad.com/canals/index_files/hooton.gif

ED CONRAD SENDS SMITHSONIAN GRANULES
REMOVED FROM BOULDER (AS INSTRUCTED)

Ed favorably followed up on Rye's request and removed
granules from the rind of the object resembling a human
cranium protruding from the boulder. However, before
mailing, Ed had the granules tested microscopically.

This is because, at this point in time, he had learned
quite a bit about the identification of bone that he didn't
know during his visit to the Smithsonian previously.

Ed was now aware that bone contains minuscule Haversian
canals and their presence is the conclusive evidence
of bone, even if the bone had petrified.

This scientific fact appears in the book, "Science in
Archaeology," which states that neither age nor the
petrification process can remove what are known as
Haversian canals, an integral part of the cell structure
of bone.

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...hefactthat.gif

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/textbook.gif

Ed had learned that, since the Haversian canals are actually
passageways for oxygen and nutrients to living bone, even
the process of petrification cannot displace them because,
as tiny tunnels, there was nothing there to begin with (and,
therefore, nothing that could be replaced.)

Prior to sending the granules to the Smithsonian, the microscopic
examination had revealed the presence of "pinholes" in the thinnest
pieces, virtually identical to cadaver bone at the same low
magnification.

MICROSCOPIC VIEW AT APPROXIMATELY 400X

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/proof2.jpg

MICROSCOPIC VIEW AT APPROXIMATELY 800X

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/proof1.jpg

Yet when Ed sent the granules to the Smithsonian, this was its
response:

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr090982.gif

EXAMINATION OF CELL STRUCTURE TOTALLY IGNORED

On Oct. 11, 1982, Ed wrote to Rye, wondering why the Smithsonian
tested for "mineral composition" when he originally mentioned it
needed to examine the "cell structure" of the granules that had
been removed from the rind of what appeared to be the contour
of a human skull embedded in the boulder.

After all, Ed maintained, Rye had stated in his letter: "We must
do a microscopic study of the outer rind to determine if it has
the structure of bone." But, according to Rye, this was not done.
Or, if it was, the Smithsonian wanted to hide that fact.

Ed insists the Smithsonian had supplied an answer to a question
-- about mineral composition -- that did not even apply in this
particular case. In any event, in his response to Ed's follow-up
letter, Rye rather surprisingly agreed about the necessity of
having the cell structure examined.

However, Rye offered an extremely weak and pathetic explanation
why the Smithsonian had not done so (although only a imbecile
would even think its experts had not viewed the cell structure
of the granules and HAD SEEN the Haversian canals, thus confirming
the material IS bone and that the object embedded in the boulder
IS INDEED a human cranium).

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...a/rr102282.gif

ED CONRAD: GROUND SECTION WASN'T NEEDED

First of all, Ed notes that the Smithsonian certainly didn't have
to prepare a ground section to examine the cell structure since
it easily could've used the granules (as he had done).

The plain and simple fact is that Rye HAD REQUESTED the granules
for the specific purpose of examining the cell structure, yet
did not have this done (or lied after it was done).

Meanwhile, if the preparation -- and examination -- of a ground
section was so important, Ed wondered why Rye had not even mentioned
it in his letter.

But even worse was Rye's explanation that, because of budget
restraints, the Smithsonian could not prepare a ground section
at taxpayers' expense.

Then -- same as now -- the Smithsonian's laboratories are fully
equipped to prepare ground sections at minimal expense and they're
made almost every blessed day. The expense involved would've been
peanuts.

It was then that Ed had very serious questions about the
Smithsonian's integrity. He knew for sure that, coupled with
earlier events, it wanted nothing to do with the honest
investigation of any of his specimens and was playing him
for a fool.

Ed had a good idea back then -- and later would become 100
percent certain (as you'll soon see) -- that the human-like
skull embedded in the boulder is indeed a human skull but
the Smithsonian obviously didn't want it known because
of the repercussions it would cause to the long-held
-- but bull**** -- theory of man's origin and ancestry.

Most importantly, the Smithsonian's pseudo-scientists knew
that a human skull discovered in Carboniferous strata
-- which indeed it was -- means that man had inhabited
the earth eons before Darwin's evolutionists has put
us here.

The Smithsonian also knew -- in one felt swoop -- that
the discovery of human remains between coal veins would
decimate the evolutionary theory of man's origin from some
lowly animals of 60-65 million years ago, since It means
man had to inhabit the earth long, long before.

And now Ed offers proof of the Smithsonian's lack of integrity by
presenting microscopic photos of granules removed from the boulder,
proving that it is indeed a petrified human skull that's as old
as coal (and probably older).

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/proof1.jpg

Granules that were removed from the specimen resembling a human skull
embedded in the boulder reveal Haversian canals, the telltale
indicator of bone. This photo was taken at 400X, using top lighting
and a dark field. It is important to note that, because of height
differential, portions of the photo are blurry.

http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/pa...ata/proof1.jpg

Photograph of cross section of bone, showing Haversian systems. Each
Haversian system is seen as a nearly round area. The light circular
core of each system is the Haversian canal, through which oxygen and
nutrients pass.

=================

LARGEST NAIL IN SMITHSONIAN'S COFFIN

TEST RESULTS OF GRANULES REMOVED FROM
SKULL-LIKE OBJECT EMBEDDED IN BOULDER

Submitted by Physicians CLinical Laboratory
Hazleton National Bank Building
101 W. Broad St.
Hazleton, Pa. 18201

OFFICIAL REPORT
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES
Chantilly, Va.

51945059/0 Received: 04/08/2000

75843/Chantilly For Null

CALCULUS ANALYSIS BY CRYSTALOGRAPHY

The specimen consists of a few small pieces of dried
blood. None of the constituents normally found in
urinary calculi are present.

*** FINAL REPORT ***

CP 978171-CS 84751

Nathan Sherman, M.D.
Director of Laboratories

Submitted by Physicians Clinical Laboratory
Hazleton National Bank Building
101 W. Broad St.
Hazleton, Pa. 18201

==============

A FEW OF ED CONRAD'S OTHER ROCKS, CONCRETIONS

http://www.edconrad.com/pics/FINGERSx.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/OldestHumanSkull.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/z8femur.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/newtibia.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/HumanJaw3.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/GallBladder1.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/pics/HumanBrain.jpg

=============

BIRDS OF A FEATHER WHO BLOW HOT AIR TOGETHER

http://www.edconrad.com/pics/SaveTheWhale.jpg

THE SMITHSONIAN
American Anthropological Association
American Association of Physical Anthropologists
American Board of Forensic Anthropology
American Society of Primatologists
American Academy of Forensic Sciences
The British Academy
Institute of Human Origins
The Leakey Foundation
Palaeoanthropology Society
University Departments (Brainwashing101)
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona
School of Human Evolution & Social Change (formerly Department of
Anthropology) Arizona State University
Anthropology at Berkeley, University of California, Berkeley
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles
Anthropology at UCSD, University of California, San Diego
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara)
Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago
Department of Anthropology, Columbia University
Department of Anthropology, Cornell University
Ph.D. Program in Anthropology, CUNY
Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University
Department of Anthropology, University of Florida
Department of Anthropology, Harvard University
Anthropology @ UIUC, University of Illinois
Anthropology Department, Indiana University
Department of Anthropology, Johns Hopkins University
Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan
Department of Anthropology, New York University
Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Anthropology: at the University of Pennsylvania
Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh
Department of Anthropology, Princeton University
Center for Human Evolutionary Studies (Rutgers University)
Department of Anthropological Sciences, Stanford Unversity
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas
Department of Anthropology, University of Virginia
Department of Anthropology, University of Washington
Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Archaeological Institute of America
Association for Feminist Anthropology
Association of Black Anthropologists
Association of Latina and Latino Anthropologists
Human Biology Association
Paleoanthropology Society
Society for American Archaeology
Society for Historical Archaeology
Society for Archaeological Sciences
Society for Applied Anthropology
Society for Economic Anthropology
Society for Ethnomusicology

UNITED STATES (REGIONAL)
Northeastern Anthropological Association
Eastern States Archaeological Federation
Council for Northeast Historical Archaeology
Archaeological Society of Connecticut
Maine Archaeological Society
Massachusetts Archaeological Society
New Hampshire Archeological Society
New York State Archaeological Association
Vermont Archaeological Society

INTERNATIONAL ANTHROPOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS
International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences
Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association
Societe canadienne de sociologie et d'anthropologie
Canadian Archaeological Association
Canadian Anthropology Society
Royal Anthropological Institute (UK)
Association of Social Anthropologists of U.K. and the Commonwealth
European Association of Social Anthropologists
Association of Social Anthropologists of Aoteaora / NewZealand
Council for British Archaeology
Society for Industrial Archaeology
Society of Africanist Archaeologists