A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A real What If? Gemini/LK to the Moon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 17th 04, 04:34 PM
Explorer8939
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default A real What If? Gemini/LK to the Moon

It would seem that a Gemini lunar mission that used an LK lander would
have been a great, cheap combination. I don't know if EOR or LOR would
have been the best architecture, but I don't think this would have
needed any more than Saturn IBs and Protons to accomplish.

The question is whether this creates an existence proof for an easy
return to the Moon soon. Of course, this assumes that a Gemini class
spacecraft could be recreated today.
  #3  
Old February 20th 04, 06:58 AM
OM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:35:34 -0500, Michael Gallagher
wrote:

Sure, you CAN do it. Whether you would WANT to is another matter.
Gemini was created as an engineering stopgap between Mercury and
Apollo to test out some things needed for Apollo.


....Yes and no. It was also built with MOL in mind as a replacement for
the canned Dyna-Soar to placate the Air Farce when McNamara ignorantly
canned the project to free up funding for Vietnam that never went
there to begin with. Sort of flying two birds with one stone, so to
speak.

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr
  #4  
Old February 23rd 04, 06:36 PM
Michael Gallagher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:58:11 -0600, OM
om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org
wrote:

[Gemini] was also built with MOL in mind as a replacement for
the canned Dyna-Soar to placate the Air Farce when McNamara ignorantly
canned the project to free up funding for Vietnam that never went
there to begin with. Sort of flying two birds with one stone, so to
speak.

OM



I didn't know MOL went that far back. Thanks.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #5  
Old February 23rd 04, 09:08 PM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Michael Gallagher wrote:


I didn't know MOL went that far back. Thanks.

MOL was going to use a Air Force derivative of Gemini called "Blue
Gemini" which allowed the crew to enter the MOL via a hatch in the heat
shield. MOL was basically a manned reconnaissance satellite with the
crew able to search out and photograph targets of interest on the ground
(MOL's other name was KH-10 Dorian) it became apparent during the
program that the weight being dedicated to the crew accommodations and
life support would be better used in building a larger unmanned
reconnaissance satellite, so MOL got canned.
The Soviets however built something very much like MOL with their Almaz
series of military space stations- they found that we had been right to
cancel MOL; not that much of interest was spotted on the ground by the
cosmonauts, and the big camera and decreased internal volume compared to
a Salyut station made the Almaz very cramped inside; the original plan
was for Almaz, like MOL, to carry its crew into space with it in a VA
return capsule attached to the nose like the Blue Gemini. Once in orbit
another spacecraft, the TKS that became the basis for the Mir add-on
modules, would dock to the Almaz and provide living quarters for the
crew as well as a second VA return capsule (film return?) to complement
the one or two smaller reentry ones already on Almaz. But this required
two proton launches to accomplish, so the Soyuz was used to ferry the
crew up to the Almaz; which now had no VA module on it. The result was a
station with pretty miserable crew accommodations, and Almaz got
canceled after three flights (Salyuts 2,3,5) a leftover one was later
launched unmanned.
The crew found that most of their time was spent on station upkeep,
leaving them little time for reconnaissance operations.

Pat

  #6  
Old February 23rd 04, 11:57 PM
Hallerb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The crew found that most of their time was spent on station upkeep,
leaving them little time for reconnaissance operations.

Pat


Sounds like ISS.................
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo Buzz alDredge Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge UK Astronomy 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla UK Astronomy 11 July 25th 04 02:57 PM
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) Nathan Jones UK Astronomy 8 February 4th 04 06:48 PM
The Apollo Moon Hoax FAQ v4.1 November 2003 Nathan Jones Misc 20 November 11th 03 07:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.