#41
|
|||
|
|||
A "collapser" or "focal reducer"?
On Jul 11, 10:22*am, (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
In article , wrote: Depending on your finances and other factors you might be better off using different scopes and prime lenses to obtain a range of focal lengths, and use a Barlow to obtain a specific FL. My original desire was for a telephoto lens with a focal length of at least 400mm. *As camera lenses, these are hideously expensive. Then I discovered "mirror lenses", but it sounds like the ones being made today stink. *Someone here pointed me to the Orion Maksutov- Cassegrain scopes which are nicely priced and will go on a camera tripod, but their focal lengths start at twice what I had in mind. My worry with refractor telescopes is that any affordable ones are going to have chromatic aberration. Consider a 1.25-inch Prime Focus Kits, # KM43: http://www.telescopeadapters.com/ind...ll_olympus.htm and an astro-photo-modded Orion Starblast: http://www.telescope.com/Astrophotog.../57/p/9974.uts Orion should be able to tell you if the scope will reach focus with your camera and adapter. For terrestrial photography you might need an extension tube to reach focus. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
T-mount questions
On Jul 11, 9:33*am, (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
In article , wrote: On Jul 10, 11:58 pm, (Paul Ciszek) wrote: In article , What kind of camera do you have? Specific model please. There are short t-rings for DSLR and long t-rings for MIL cameras. My Olympus OM-D E-M5 is a micro-four-thirds system camera. Based on that info, I would conclude that you need the second of the three links that you included in your original post since your camera appears to be a DSLR and not an MIL. No, the micro-four-thirds standard is mirrorless. *Lenses made specifically for the micro-four-thirds system can take advantage of this and get the lens closer to the sensor. And all of the links I included were T-mount adapters claiming to be specifically for the micro-four-thirds standard. Then, you would likely use the products shown in your first and third links to connect an older or third-party lens to your camera, or perhaps use the product in the second link along with an additional adapter to connect your camera to a telescope's focuser. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
A "collapser" or "focal reducer"?
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:49:07 -0500, William Hamblen
wrote: Mirror lenses, even the ones from the big camera companies, are notorious for being soft. Plus they are slow - typically f/8. If you said what camera this is for, and what you are going to shoot, I've forgotten. You can still get a second hand Nikkor mirror lens for a reasonable price. It won't autofocus. I don't think Canon ever put out an EF mount mirror lens. There are adapters. And the Canon EOS has a mount larger than most so you can, with an appropriate adapter, mont almost any lens on a Canon EOS. You can for instance, with an adapter, mount a Nikon lens on Canon EOS, but you cannot mount a Canon lens on a Nikon camera because there isn't space enough on the Nikon camera. I have gathered a collection of mirror lenses, with focal lengths of 300, 500, 600 and 1100 mm. They all require adapters to fit on the EOS. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what is the best mount? | MikeToms | Amateur Astronomy | 50 | September 30th 09 10:02 AM |
CG-5A Go-to mount? | Jim[_13_] | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | May 30th 07 03:36 PM |
2 newbie mount questions | Mark Watson | UK Astronomy | 6 | June 15th 05 02:15 PM |
Atlas mount vs. Vixen mount | Mike Jones | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | December 31st 04 11:25 PM |
which alt-az mount? | Jacob | UK Astronomy | 0 | November 28th 04 11:06 AM |