A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

An opinion piece on a need for focus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 16, 07:47 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default An opinion piece on a need for focus

In the wake of SpaceX's most recent anomaly:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...acex-to-focus/

rick jones
--
Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that. - Anonymous
these opinions are mine, all mine; HPE might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hpe.com but NOT BOTH...
  #2  
Old September 2nd 16, 08:27 PM posted to sci.space.policy
jacob navia
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 341
Default An opinion piece on a need for focus

Le 02/09/2016 à 20:47, Rick Jones a écrit :
In the wake of SpaceX's most recent anomaly:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...acex-to-focus/

rick jones

“Sending thousands to colonize Mars may just have to be put on the
back burner until he can send three people to ISS.”

Interesting article.
  #3  
Old September 12th 16, 04:07 PM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default An opinion piece on a need for focus

On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 6:51:47 AM UTC+12, Rick Jones wrote:
In the wake of SpaceX's most recent anomaly:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...acex-to-focus/

rick jones
--
Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that. - Anonymous
these opinions are mine, all mine; HPE might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hpe.com but NOT BOTH...


The thing that sets SpaceX leagues ahead of all other aerospace companies is its long-term vision. Making humanity a space-faring species. Colonising Mars. He's a strong executive.

In contrast, Eisenhower set up NASA without a strong executive within the agency so NASA could not chart its own course beyond the President's direction. That way a future administration could curtail and eventually end civilian space programme which Eisenhower opposed. He thought civilian space wasteful of resources and a national security threat that could be easily penetrated by US enemies and was forced to approve what Congress wanted after Sputnik. The only real executive vision was vonBraun - and he was sidelined after Apollo and largely silenced during Apollo.

Musk is stirring up the visionary elements around the world and I find it interesting that when a set back occurs, 'expert' opinion urges him to set aside visionary long-term goals and focus on the task at hand - as if that alone will spell long-term success.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DLR in C5 prime focus: cannot get fully in-focus images RePete Amateur Astronomy 5 October 30th 06 11:01 AM
The Totalitarian Temptation in Space -Another Jeff Bell Editioral/Opinion Piece Earl Colby Pottinger Policy 114 June 10th 06 02:11 PM
The Totalitarian Temptation in Space -Another Jeff Bell Editioral/Opinion Piece Space Cadet Policy 114 June 5th 06 10:45 PM
2" eye piece Steve - www.ukspeedtraps.co.uk UK Astronomy 5 December 20th 04 01:51 PM
tired ot carrying your Losmandy GM-8 out, piece by piece? [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 9 December 16th 04 05:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.