|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"First Man" Any Thoughts?
Henry Spencer wrote:
Slayton's book actually makes this quite clear: even had there been no technical reason for Armstrong going out first, he was the senior astronaut and therefore had priority. Seniority counted for a lot in Slayton's astronaut corps. Was he senior because he'd been in the corps longer, or because he was the commander? Could you have a crew with the commander an astronaut that had served in the corps for a lesser time? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"First Man" Any Thoughts?
In article ,
Mary Pegg wrote: Slayton's book actually makes this quite clear: even had there been no technical reason for Armstrong going out first, he was the senior astronaut and therefore had priority. Seniority counted for a lot... Was he senior because he'd been in the corps longer, or because he was the commander? He'd been in the corps longer -- he was part of the second group, while Aldrin was from the third (as was Collins). Aldrin probably also rated as extra-junior because he wasn't a test pilot. The third group could substitute extra engineering qualifications for test-pilot background, and Aldrin did. But that made him a second-class citizen in Slayton's corps; Slayton admits that he thought of the third group as really being two groups, the test pilots and the rest, with the test pilots aimed at immediate flight assignments and the others in support jobs for the moment. Aldrin made it to a Gemini flight assignment (and thus to enough experience to land an early Apollo assignment) only because the original Gemini 9 crew was killed in a plane crash, and that moved later backup crews up. Could you have a crew with the commander an astronaut that had served in the corps for a lesser time? I don't think that ever happened under Slayton. There were ties, but no actual reversals that I can remember. By rights, Al Shepard probably *should* have been LMP rather than Commander on his Apollo flight, but that just wasn't going to happen to Slayton's buddy. However, when Slayton *himself* moved into the flight rotation, he didn't have *his* buddy setting the crew assignments for him. He'd made a draft crew selection -- with himself as commander -- but gave the final decision to Chris Kraft. Kraft put Stafford (second group) in as commander, with Brand (fifth group, fourth if you don't count the scientist-astronauts) and Slayton (first group and the most senior active astronaut) as crew. (He was the first chief astronaut to try to give himself a plum assignment, but he wasn't the last. For example, Hubble's first firm launch date was mid-1986, and the crew assigned to that mission by chief astronaut John Young was commanded by none other than John Young. The Challenger disaster put that crew assignment back up in the air, and then Young got himself unofficially grounded and lost that slot.) -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"First Man" Any Thoughts?
Mary Pegg wrote:
Slayton's book actually makes this quite clear: even had there been no technical reason for Armstrong going out first, he was the senior astronaut and therefore had priority. Seniority counted for a lot in Slayton's astronaut corps. Was he senior because he'd been in the corps longer, or because he was the commander? Both. Could you have a crew with the commander an astronaut that had served in the corps for a lesser time? Apollo-Soyuz comes to mind. -- Dave Michelson |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"First Man" Any Thoughts?
Dave Michelson wrote:
Mary Pegg wrote: Slayton's book actually makes this quite clear: even had there been no technical reason for Armstrong going out first, he was the senior astronaut and therefore had priority. Seniority counted for a lot in Slayton's astronaut corps. Was he senior because he'd been in the corps longer, or because he was the commander? Both. Could you have a crew with the commander an astronaut that had served in the corps for a lesser time? Apollo-Soyuz comes to mind. In which case, is the commander the senior astronaut, or is it the longest-serving? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"First Man" Any Thoughts?
"Dave Michelson" wrote in message news:ybtof.120343$Gd6.104275@pd7tw3no... Mary Pegg wrote: Could you have a crew with the commander an astronaut that had served in the corps for a lesser time? Apollo-Soyuz comes to mind. Most of Story Musgrave's flights would qualify too. Although, he wasn't qualified to be a commander. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thoughts please | Roger Hembury | UK Astronomy | 2 | January 10th 05 04:02 PM |
Thoughts on alternative launch methods | [email protected] | Technology | 14 | December 20th 04 05:53 AM |
Some thoughts on extra solar planets (replies welcome) | K.M.N. | Misc | 4 | June 5th 04 02:56 PM |
Thoughts on binoviewers (New Denk II's arrived) | Tom Hole | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 8th 04 02:37 AM |
How 'bout the 8" newt then? was: Thoughts on Hardin 80mm refractor? | Brian | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | August 27th 03 08:52 PM |