A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principle bystandard electrodynamics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 15th 17, 07:15 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Non Newtonian Propulsion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principle bystandard electrodynamics





http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=42239.0

  #2  
Old February 17th 17, 02:42 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,039
Default Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principleby standard electrodynamics

On 16/02/2017 5:15 AM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:




http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=42239.0


Just a poor photon drive.

Sylvia.
  #3  
Old February 17th 17, 11:20 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Non Newtonian Propulsion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principleby standard electrodynamics

Il giorno venerdì 17 febbraio 2017 02:42:20 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 16/02/2017 5:15 AM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:




http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=42239.0


Just a poor photon drive.


you have no experiment that excludes Lorentz forces betweeen dipoles :-)



Sylvia.


  #4  
Old February 17th 17, 11:25 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Sylvia Else
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,039
Default Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principleby standard electrodynamics

On 17/02/2017 9:20 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
Il giorno venerdì 17 febbraio 2017 02:42:20 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 16/02/2017 5:15 AM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:




http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=42239.0


Just a poor photon drive.


you have no experiment that excludes Lorentz forces betweeen dipoles :-)


The net Lorentz force on the dipoles imparts an increase in momentum of
the dipoles that balances the momentum carried away in the other
direction by electromagnetic radiation. Total momentum is conserved. It
is, as I said, a photon drive.

Sylvia.

  #5  
Old February 17th 17, 12:43 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Non Newtonian Propulsion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18
Default Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principleby standard electrodynamics

Il giorno venerdì 17 febbraio 2017 11:25:14 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 17/02/2017 9:20 PM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
Il giorno venerdì 17 febbraio 2017 02:42:20 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 16/02/2017 5:15 AM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:




http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=42239.0


Just a poor photon drive.


you have no experiment that excludes Lorentz forces betweeen dipoles :-)


The net Lorentz force on the dipoles imparts an increase in momentum of
the dipoles that balances the momentum carried away in the other
direction by electromagnetic radiation.


is not true ...the net Lorentz forces can offer a momentum pE/c ( E= energy, c= velocity of light)

Total momentum is conserved.


if action reaction is violated , you need to write again the inertia law a the momentum law


It
is, as I said, a photon drive.


The thrust of lorentz forces are much more than the push of a photon drives.
And i repeat that (except Asps www.asps.it )since the Maxwell times
nobody go to investigate what Maxwell says in his Treatise (pag.163 Vol.2)

…..NO EXPERIMENTS ON THE MUTUAL ACTION OF UNCLOSED CIRCUITS HAVE BEEN MADE...

Sylvia.


E.Laureti

  #6  
Old Today, 06:18 AM posted to sci.space.policy
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,399
Default Standard procedure to violate Newtonian action reaction principleby standard electrodynamics

On 2/16/2017 8:42 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 16/02/2017 5:15 AM, Non Newtonian Propulsion wrote:
http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...?topic=42239.0


Just a poor photon drive.

Sylvia.


I would say "follow that link". In particular pay close attention to
Paul March's response in that thread. Pretty much says it all.

Dave

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Curves in spacetime violate Heisenberg's uncertainty principle Sam Wormley[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 2 February 19th 13 08:59 PM
Violation of action reaction principle No Name Policy 3 February 6th 13 03:54 AM
Breaking Action-Reaction. jdawe Astronomy Misc 0 February 14th 11 04:29 AM
Action and Reaction =0 or -0 or+0 G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 0 January 7th 07 11:27 PM
Examine hull before re-entry, a new standard procedure? Ross C. Bubba Nicholson Space Shuttle 28 July 29th 03 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.