A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Station
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ed Lu Letter from Space #6



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 4th 03, 11:10 AM
Jacques van Oene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ed Lu Letter from Space #6

Orbits

Lately, it seems like every time I look out the window I see Canada. A few
weeks ago it seemed that it was always the southern Andes Mountains and
Tierra Del Fuego. While I have nothing against Canada or the Andes
Mountains, I got to wondering why that is. It turns out there is a fairly
simple explanation for the "Oh Canada!" effect and the "The Andes Again!"
effect, but you have to understand a little bit about orbits first. Plus,
many of the really neat things I've been describing about living on the ISS
are a result of being in orbit - so it's worth a mention.

You may have noticed that I keep mentioning the speed we are traveling at up
here - about 18000 MPH. That is the key to what keeps us from falling back
down to the ground. In fact, we are always falling towards the Earth, it's
just that we manage to keep missing it. I'll explain. Think of standing on
the ground and throwing a baseball. The harder you throw it, the further it
goes before gravity pulls it to the ground. Obvious. Now imagine you are
incredibly strong and can throw the baseball all the way across the country,
or even half way around the Earth before it lands. Now reach back and throw
it even harder - perhaps it goes three fourths of the way around the Earth.
What if you throw it even faster? Then maybe it will fly almost completely
around the Earth and land right at your feet. Now throw it just a bit
harder. What will happen? If there was no atmosphere and therefore no air
resistance to slow the ball down, the ball would fly all the way around the
world, right past your feet, and keep going. Since it doesn't slow down, it
keeps right on going and continues around the Earth again and again. The
ball would be in orbit.

For the physicists and engineers out there, you know the story isn't quite
that simple, but the basic idea is correct. The trick to being in orbit is
to get going fast enough that you go all the way around the Earth in the
time it takes gravity to turn your direction around. While gravity is
pulling you downwards all the time and making you curve around the Earth,
the curvature of your trajectory isn't enough to actually run into the
ground. If you think about a bit you'll see that there are some
complications, namely you have to throw the ball at the proper angle so it
doesn't run straight into the ground, and also you have to show that the
trajectory doesn't diverge after repeated laps. Of course you also have to
make sure you don't go too fast, or you will just fly away since the Earth's
gravity won't be strong enough to pull you back again.

So that's all it takes, a lot of speed and initially a little bit of aiming
to make sure you don't hit the ground, and as long as you are high enough so
you are out of the atmosphere you will just keep going round and round the
planet. For orbiting the Earth at our altitude, that required speed is about
18000 MPH. That is the purpose of the big rocket that our Soyuz spacecraft
sat on top of on the launch pad, and is also the purpose of the Space
Shuttles main engines and solid rocket boosters - they both serve to lift
their respective spacecraft high enough to get out of the atmosphere, and
then to reach orbital speed. Once that is complete, they are no longer
needed - the force of gravity will keep the spacecraft in orbit around the
Earth. The Space Station and everything in it (including Yuri and myself)
are just coasting along in orbit, much like the moon also orbits the Earth.

The interesting thing about orbits is that the closer you are to the planet,
the faster you need to go. This makes sense since the force of gravity
decreases as you move away from the planet. That's how Newton first figured
out his law of gravitation, by reasoning that the moon was in orbit and
figuring out that the force of Earth's gravity pulling on the moon had to be
much less than it was on the surface of the Earth. The effect of this is
that if you momentarily speed up in orbit, you will climb to a higher orbit
where in fact your speed will decrease. We make use of this fact during the
rendezvous of the Space Shuttle and Soyuz with the ISS.

Even though we are above almost all the atmosphere, there are still traces
left at this altitude which do cause some drag on the space station. This
has the effect of slowing us down slightly over time. This then has the
effect of lowering our orbit where in fact our speed will then increase
again, but at a lower altitude. In order to stay out of the atmosphere, we
have to periodically boost our orbit back up again. A few weeks ago we fired
the engines for a few minutes on the Progress which was already docked to
the Station in order to compensate for this small drag. The engines of the
Progress are small compared to the huge station, so our acceleration was
very little, and in fact we only used it to increase our speed by 1
meter/sec, about walking speed. We tried to watch out the window to see the
engine firing, but we don't have a window which can see straight backwards,
so we couldn't actually see much. We were able to show that the station was
very slowly accelerating by letting a pen float in the air. It slowly
started to move towards the rear of the station. Actually, it was the
station wall which was slowly accelerating towards the pen.

A common misconception is that the reason we are weightless because we are
beyond the Earth's gravity. In fact, the reason we are in orbit is exactly
because we are being pulled downwards by gravity - as I said earlier it is
only because we are going fast that we manage to keep from hitting the
Earth. The reason we are weightless here is that the entire ship around is
also being pulled by gravity in exactly the same way, so we are both falling
around the Earth together. It is the same feeling that you get when in a
roller coaster going over the top, you feel light in your seat for a moment
because the seat is falling out from under you.
In a sense the entire Space Station has been pulled out from under us. In
fact, when flying around and doing flips inside the Space Station, I am just
doing exactly what divers do when they do flips as they dive off a diving
board. They are "weightless" also while they are in the air, it is just that
they only get a second or so until they hit the water. We get 6 months.

As I described in my last letter, our orbit path is like a big hoop around
the Earth that we circle round and round. Meanwhile, the Earth is rotating
on its axis once a day inside the hoop. Since the Earth is pretty close to a
perfect sphere (but not quite), its rotation doesn't affect our orbit very
much (think about how you would notice if a perfect sphere was rotated
around - answer - you wouldn't). As I mentioned before, the hoop of our
orbit doesn't go around the equator, but rather is tilted by 51.6 degrees.
You can figure out why that is pretty easily; our launch site Baikonur is
not on the equator. Since our orbit has to start from Baikonur, it has to be
tilted relative to the equator in order to pass over that point.

I've included a picture here of a computer program we use to give us our
current position and show the track of our orbit across the ground. In the
middle of the screen, the two small red rectangles with the little white
circle between them is supposed to represent the Space Station. The white
circle around it is roughly the patch of ground you can see if you look
down. Right now the Space Station is over Western Sahara (you can see the
zoomed insert in the lower left) and moving southeast towards the bottom
right hand corner. The white dotted lines show the path that the Space
Station will follow in this orbit, as well as the next two orbits. The
reason the 2nd and 3rd orbits are displaced to the left is that during the
90 minutes it takes us to complete a lap around the hoop, the Earth has
rotated by one 16th of a revolution to the right, so our orbit track is
displaced to the left by that much each time. You can see that we never
cross over any point with latitude greater than 51.6 degrees, so we never
get to see the North or South poles from here. You can also see that if we
do go over a point, we go over it twice a day: once going northeast, and
once going southeast.

The shaded areas of the map are the areas in darkness, and the rest of the
map is in daylight. If you are wondering why the day-night line curves up
and down, it is for the same reason that our orbit curves up and down -
namely the sun isn't over the equator so that while half the Earth is lit up
that half doesn't line up with the equator or one of the lines of longitude.
You can see that now in the summertime, very far northern points will always
be in daylight.

From the map, you can also see that part of the solution to our puzzle is
that our orbit tracks at the far northernmost and southernmost parts run due
East. That means that on repeated orbits we'll get to see the same point
again. That doesn't happen for points near the equator since as you can see
our orbit path is southeast or northeast so if you see a point once, you
won't see it again on the next orbit, at least not very well. So you are
likely to see points near the southernmost and northernmost parts of our
orbit more frequently. But then why Canada and not the Andes now, and why
the opposite a few weeks ago?

The answer has to do with timing. The shaded portion of the map and our
orbit track both move left together over the course of the day as the Earth
rotates underneath us, so picture the map as sliding to the right while the
dotted lines and shaded area of the screen stay in position. From the map
you can see that when Canada crosses under our orbit, it will be roughly in
the middle of the bright region, meaning in the middle of the day in Canada.
When we are crossing the southernmost part of our orbit (i.e. the Andes) it
is nighttime. At the time this picture was taken the "Oh Canada" effect was
in full force. During our workday (we live on a timezone roughly halfway
between Houston and Moscow - Greenwich Mean Time), we tend to look out and
see Canada, especially since we have free time in the evening, which is the
middle of the day in Canada.

It turns out though that our orbit hoop slowly rotates due to the fact that
the Earth isn't quite a perfect sphere. This turns out to apply a torque to
our orbit which makes it slowly shift westward with respect to the sun, and
therefore the lighted part of the screen. It is the same effect that makes a
spinning top wobble. In effect our orbit is like a large top, and the fact
that the Earth has a bit of a bulge around the equator causes our orbit hoop
to wobble slowly. In a few weeks, the southernmost part of the orbit will be
in the fully lit section of the orbit, and we will be back to seeing lots of
the Andes again. Actually I'm looking forward to our orbit track shifting a
bit since I am trying to take a photograph of the Great Wall of China. Right
now, of the two times a day we cross over it, once is during our sleeptime
when we are heading southeast. The northeastbound crossing is during our
awake hours, but it is very close to sunrise in Beijing, so the lighting is
bad and it is difficult to take a photo.

This is a screen shot of the computer program we use to tell where we are.
The places labeled EOS are locations that scientists have requested photos
of. Godzilla is shown for scale.

-Ed Lu-


--
----

Jacques :-)

Editor: www.spacepatches.info

------------------------------------------------------



Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Space Shuttle 150 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) Rand Simberg Space Science Misc 18 February 14th 04 03:28 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 03:33 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.