Anti-gravity experiment

You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote:
You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote:





You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

On Oct 2, 12:40 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote:





On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote:

You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating,
defining speed.

Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to
be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and
exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A
heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself
far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right
synchrony and balance.

On Oct 2, 12:52 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:40 pm, gb6726 wrote:





On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote:

You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating,
defining speed.

Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to
be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and
exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A
heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself
far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right
synchrony and balance.

Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with
speeds
at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G
and
slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean
reaching
over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central
weight to
de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation
only
with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme
rotating
velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to
higher rpm-s,
probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's
gravity.

On Oct 2, 12:58 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 12:52 pm, gb6726 wrote:





On Oct 2, 12:40 pm, gb6726 wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:36 pm, gb6726 wrote:

On Oct 2, 12:30 pm, gb6726 wrote:

You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating,
defining speed.

Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to
be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and
exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A
heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself
far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right
synchrony and balance.

Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with
speeds
at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G
and
slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean
reaching
over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central
weight to
de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation
only
with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme
rotating
velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to
higher rpm-s,
probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's
gravity.

What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but
do back and forth 180.

You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating,
defining speed.

Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to
be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and
exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A
heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself
far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right
synchrony and balance.

Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with
speeds
at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G
and
slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean
reaching
over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central
weight to
de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation
only
with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme
rotating
velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to
higher rpm-s,
probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's
gravity.

What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but
do back and forth 180.

These are the things Hollywood does so well in slow motion.

On Oct 2, 1:37 pm, gb6726 wrote:
You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating,
defining speed.

Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to
be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and
exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A
heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself
far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right
synchrony and balance.

Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with
speeds
at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G
and
slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean
reaching
over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central
weight to
de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation
only
with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme
rotating
velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to
higher rpm-s,
probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's
gravity.

What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but
do back and forth 180.

These are the things Hollywood does so well in slow motion.

Seek timing Luke Skywalker.

On Oct 2, 2:11 pm, gb6726 wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:37 pm, gb6726 wrote:





You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and when they do, the
spaceship moves. A weight is lifted and
thrown to the side.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously. Perpetual motion rules
say this is not possible.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and reappear somewhere else?
Teletransportation of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The idea is the energize and
reenergize mass elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship accelerating.

To spin an object in place is not impossible. Weight spin around, the
spaceship has no attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway, forward and back
motion of a weight would create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not produce motion from
the original spot, but! One motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Aheim.

Now let's make this experiment. The spaceship is shaped like a rocket,
a long tunnel inside. A heavy object moves from the top of the rocket
to
the bottom. The spaceship also rotates slowly, and when it rotates 180
degrees to exchange places in position with the top and bottom of the
rocket, the weight once again travels across between the top and the
bottom. What happens dear astronomer?

Also note: If the ball game slows the rotation, rotation can be easily
induced internally, but what is produced is motion without rocket
fuel.
Well, theoretically.

Basically you need a central rotating weight that keeps accelerating,
defining speed.

Can we send an object to the Moon? This central rotation needs to
be able to reach 10 thousand+ kilometers an hour of acceleration and
exchange of weight with such pulsating speed. It would be a disk. A
heavy object swinging 180 degrees with large power can throw itself
far, it needs to keep throwing itself further and further at the right
synchrony and balance.

Oh, and as far as the object is moving, it wouldn't be moving with
speeds
at over 10 thousand kilometers an hour, it would step by step beat 1G
and
slowly move out to space, but in space this acceleration would mean
reaching
over 10 thousand kilometers an hour. The spinning of the central
weight to
de-rotate the spinning and work with maintaining a 180 degree rotation
only
with each swing say at one second intervals, would mean an extreme
rotating
velocity at the center that would have to keep on accelerating to
higher rpm-s,
probably reaching speed of light in rotation before exiting Earth's
gravity.

What if: You don't need to keep accelerating a rotation internally but
do back and forth 180.

These are the things Hollywood does so well in slow motion.

Seek timing Luke Skywalker.

"You need a rotor"

Yoda balances back into position through rotation after each swing
with the
heavy weight thrown by Luke Skywalker. Luke yells up: Are we moving?
Yoda:
Not if you are throwing the swings at the wrong timong. Trust me.
Close your
eyes and feel the... circumstance. You will know what you will have to
do.
Luke: If I could have my powers we wouldn't be in this mess.)

Dear gb6726:

On Oct 2, 11:30 am, gb6726 wrote:
You have a spacestation in space.

The idea is to set this weight into motion.

Imagine you have weights that can move, and
when they do, the spaceship moves. A weight
is lifted and thrown to the side.

Like an ice skater swinging his / her arms.

The idea is to transfer weight autonomously.
Perpetual motion rules say this is not possible.

No, conservation of momentum says it must be true. This is how rocket
motors work too.

Can a weight disappear autonomously and
reappear somewhere else? Teletransportation
of mass was seen in the film Fly and in Star Trek
series.

Cannot be reproduced in the lab.

Now focus on teletransportation of mass. The
idea is the energize and reenergize mass
elsewhere and keep motion of a spaceship
accelerating.

What happened to the "dissolved matter's" momentum? You teleport it
to some other place, but what did you do with its momentum?

To spin an object in place is not impossible.
Weight spin around, the spaceship has no
attachment and will as well begin rotating. Energy
making is the best with rotating weights anyway,
forward and back motion of a weight would
create what's called a wobble. Even mixing
effects of rotation and wobbling, one would not
produce motion from the original spot, but! One
motion can change everything. Don't get
fooled.

Telelporation of massive objects does not yet exist. Conservation of
momentum seems to still hold. You have nothing new.

David A. Smith