|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Constant Speed of Light: the Falsehood That Killed Physics
"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html
"But the researchers said they spent a lot of time working on a theory that wouldn't destabilise our understanding of physics. "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light [...] So we had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/a...t-speed-slowed Einstein desperately wrestled with the nonsense but introduced it in the end: John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm The speed of light is OBVIOUSLY variable: Stationary light source; moving receiver: http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif Frequency measured by the source: f; by the moving receiver: f' f. Speed of pulses relative to the source: c = df (d is distance between pulses). Speed of pulses relative to the moving receiver: c' = df' c in violation of Einstein's relativity. Any relevant experiment, if correctly interpreted, shows that the speed of light is VARIABLE: John Norton: "The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92: "Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether. If it was so obvious, though, why did he need to state it as a principle? Because, having taken from the idea of light waves in the ether the one aspect that he needed, he declared early in his paper, to quote his own words, that "the introduction of a 'luminiferous ether' will prove to be superfluous." https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-It.../dp/0486406768 Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense That Killed Physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | February 25th 18 07:47 AM |
How Einstein Unhinged the Speed of Light (Killed Physics) | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 21st 17 07:06 PM |
The constant-speed-of-light falsehood that killed physics | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 7th 17 02:56 PM |
WHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT CANNOT BE CONSTANT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 15th 15 02:42 PM |
NO PHYSICS IS POSSIBLE WITHOUT CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | June 20th 13 01:37 PM |